Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-19D94045

6/28/2026, 4:09:30 AM

code-analysis security assessment v6

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
code-analysis
Version
v6
Maintainer
abereyes
Source
github.com/AbeJitsu/Learn-Claude-Code/tree/main/skills/code-analysis
Coverage
2 Files scanned · 736 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Highest confirmed finding severity

Low

1 confirmed security finding requires attention.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

The static weak cryptography findings are false positives caused by readability terms such as token, serialize, and hash-related wording, not cryptographic operations. The Markdown backtick findings are also false positives from fenced examples and documented CLI usage. The skill is safe to publish with a low warning because it runs a local script that reads user-selected files and may print code snippets.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

2 Files scanned · 736 Lines analyzed

1 item shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Observed in 2 evidence locations

Network access

May connect to external services.

Not recorded by this audit

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Observed in 1 evidence location

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Not recorded by this audit

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Observed in 1 evidence location

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

Confirmed security concerns (1)

RISK-001 Low
analyze.py:178-190analyze.py:211-218analyze.py:667-675
Local File Read Requires User Care
The analyzer accepts a user-provided --path value, checks that the path exists, and reads the file contents for analysis. This is expected for a readability tool, but users should avoid scanning files that contain secrets or sensitive source because snippets can be included in output.
The code clearly reads local files from a user-supplied path and can report snippets. No evidence found of network exfiltration, shell execution, or hidden persistence.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (3)
Low
SKILL.md:3analyze.py:29analyze.py:46analyze.py:69analyze.py:95analyze.py:100analyze.py:108-109analyze.py:128analyze.py:285-287analyze.py:304-306analyze.py:355analyze.py:370analyze.py:417analyze.py:473-481analyze.py:490-501analyze.py:509analyze.py:587analyze.py:667
Weak Cryptography Static Findings Are False Positives
The flagged locations use words such as token, serialize, JSON, and descriptions for readability issues. No evidence found of weak hashing, encryption, or cryptographic APIs in the scanned files.
The reviewed locations are static text, comments, labels, or readability suggestions. They do not call MD5, SHA-1, encryption routines, random generators, or password handling logic.
Low
SKILL.md:25-27SKILL.md:31-36SKILL.md:40-46
Markdown Backtick Static Findings Are False Positives
The SKILL.md findings are Markdown fenced examples and documented usage for running the local analyzer. They are not Ruby shell backticks and do not create hidden command execution.
The backticks delimit Markdown code blocks. The only command shown is an explicit user-facing python3 invocation for the local script.
Low
analyze.py:359
System Reconnaissance Static Finding Is False Positive
The line flagged for system reconnaissance resets an internal counter after reporting a readability issue. No evidence found of host enumeration, system probing, or environment collection.
The line is a local state reset inside comment-ratio analysis. It has no operating system calls, network calls, or data collection behavior.

Verify and export

JSON report CITATION.cff SARIF 2.1.0 Signed installation manifest

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable