Histórico de Auditoria

All 106 static findings are false positives. The skill is a scientific peer review documentation tool. Detected 'C2 keywords' are false positives from legitimate terms like 'command-line'. 'Weak cryptographic algorithm' references are educational content in reference materials for evaluating manuscript methodology. Backtick patterns are markdown code formatting in documentation examples. No actual malicious code execution patterns exist.

AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.

AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.

All 94 static findings are FALSE POSITIVES. This is a documentation-only skill containing markdown reference materials for scientific peer review. The static analyzer misidentified documentation text (e.g., 'hardcoded URLs' that are reference links, 'shell backticks' that are markdown code examples) as security issues. There is no executable code, no network calls, no command execution - only documentation content.

No credential access, environment harvesting, or network exfiltration patterns detected. Content is instructional and aligned with peer review tasks.