code-reviewer
Review Code Changes with Evidence
Code reviews can miss blockers, regressions, and unverified claims. This skill guides a focused, evidence-based review of the relevant change set.
내 에이전트로 설치
이 요청을 에이전트에 복사하세요. 공식 Skill 페이지와 매니페스트가 포함되어 있습니다.
Review the Skillstore skill "code-reviewer" from https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.에이전트는 계속해서 계획을 표시하고 보안 정책에서 요구하는 확인을 요청해야 합니다.
에이전트가 읽기 쉬운 리소스
AI 에이전트, 크롤러, 스크립트가 전체 페이지 대신 정리된 컨텍스트만 필요할 때 이 링크를 사용하세요.
테스트해 보기
"code-reviewer" 사용 중입니다. Review a change that modifies authentication validation.
예상 결과:
- Change summary: Validation now rejects expired sessions.
- Blocker: A refresh path still accepts an expired token.
- Verification gap: No test result was provided for the refresh path.
"code-reviewer" 사용 중입니다. Re-review a bug fix after developer feedback.
예상 결과:
- Change summary: The null check was added in the requested method.
- Major: A neighboring caller still passes an invalid value.
- Remaining risk: The integration scenario needs a focused test.
보안 감사
안전All 35 static findings are false positives. The backtick matches are Markdown inline-code spans in a Chinese-language review instruction file, and the `../` matches are static relative links to sibling documentation, so there is no command execution or path traversal. The entropy alert reflects UTF-8 Chinese prose. No prompt injection, network access, data exfiltration, or malicious intent was found.
위험 요인
⚙️ 외부 명령어 (14)
이 보고서 공유 및 인용
버전이 지정된 평가 보고서, 중립 배지, 임베드 카드 및 인용을 공유하세요. Skillstore는 근거를 보고하지만 이 Skill의 안전 여부를 판단하지 않습니다.
보고서 링크 복사
https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 배지
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 배지
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>임베드 카드
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>학술 인용 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 인용
zhaobolun-code. (2026). code-reviewer security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/audits/1BibTeX 인용
@techreport{zhaobolun-code-zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer-2026,
author = {zhaobolun-code},
title = {code-reviewer security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "code-reviewer security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "zhaobolun-code"
date-released: "2026-09-17"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
변형 비교
설치 가능한 변형 10개각 작성자의 스킬은 별도의 설치 항목으로 유지됩니다. 추천 변형은 Skillstore 근거로 순위가 정해집니다.
이 변형이 1위인 이유
alirezarezvani-code-reviewer
2026-10-22
autumnsgrove-code-reviewer
2026-09-09
curiouslearner-code-reviewer
2026-09-09
google-gemini-code-reviewer
2026-09-09
shubhamsaboo-code-reviewer
2026-09-09
zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer
2026-10-06
Skillstore 점수
이 점수의 이유 증거 신뢰도: 중간만들 수 있는 것
Review a pull request
Identify release-blocking defects and regression risks before merging a focused change.
Check a repair round
Review only the latest fixes and confirm whether earlier findings were addressed.
Assess delivery evidence
Check whether claimed validation has supporting commands, outputs, and scope.
이 프롬프트를 사용해 보세요
Review my current code changes. List blockers and regression risks with evidence.
Review this pull request against its stated requirements. Prioritize defects that could block merging.
Re-review only the changes made since the previous review. Confirm which earlier findings remain.
Perform a standards and specification review of this change. Group findings by axis and include integration risks.
모범 사례
- Provide the change scope, requirements, and relevant test results before requesting review.
- Address blocker and major findings before requesting a re-review.
- Use a focused re-review after fixes instead of repeating the entire review.
피하기
- Do not request a review without identifying the change set or expected behavior.
- Do not treat a review as proof that tests and runtime validation succeeded.
- Do not use minor style preferences as merge blockers.
자주 묻는 질문
Does this skill change my code?
What should I provide for a review?
Can it review a pull request?
Can it re-review a fix?
Does it run tests automatically?
Does it perform a security review?
개발자 세부 정보
작성자
zhaobolun-code라이선스
MIT
Skillstore 리비전
r1
버전 안내
작성자가 버전을 선언하지 않았습니다.
참조
9be34bdd3e1cb2f1280ccd11fa00419204fc4d81
유지보수 최신성
2026. 9. 18.
사용량
0 다운로드 · 0 조회
파일 구조