スキル code-quality
📦

code-quality

コンテンツリビジョン r1 安全 ⚙️ 外部コマンド🌐 ネットワークアクセス

Review and Simplify Code Without Losing Correctness

Complex logic and unnecessary abstractions make code harder to maintain and can hide failures. This skill guides focused reviews and refactors that preserve behavior, public contracts, and security checks.

対応: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 78 ブロンズ

自分のエージェントでインストール

このリクエストをエージェントにコピーしてください。正規の Skill ページとマニフェストが含まれています。

エージェントリクエスト
Review the Skillstore skill "code-quality" from https://skillstore.io/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

エージェントは引き続き計画を提示し、セキュリティポリシーで必要な確認を求める必要があります。

エージェントが読めるリソース

AI エージェント、クローラー、スクリプトがページ全体ではなく整理されたコンテキストを必要とする場合は、これらのリンクを使ってください。

Markdown詳細 GET /skills/shreyam1008-code-quality.md 署名済み manifest GET /api/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/manifest 署名済み lockfile GET /api/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/lockfile

テストする

「code-quality」を使用しています。 Review a search workflow where an earlier request can complete after a later request.

期待される結果:

  • Finding: an older response can overwrite the current search results.
  • Consequence: users can see results that do not match their latest query.
  • Recommendation: accept results only when they belong to the current request.
  • Validation: test responses completing in reverse order and cancellation during an active request.

「code-quality」を使用しています。 Assess whether a wrapper around a standard parser can be removed.

期待される結果:

  • Check callers for custom defaults, error handling, and compatibility requirements before removing the wrapper.
  • Replace the wrapper only when the standard parser preserves the required behavior.
  • Validate empty inputs, malformed inputs, and failure contracts.
  • Keep the wrapper when it represents a real ownership or compatibility boundary.

セキュリティ監査

安全
v1 • 2026/10/2 バージョン別レポートを開く

All three static findings are false positives: Markdown inline formatting and reference links do not execute commands or initiate network requests. No evidence found of prompt injection, data exfiltration, or malicious instructions in the reviewed SKILL.md.

1
スキャンされたファイル
42
解析済み行数
0
レビュー項目
0
誤検知を無視

リスク要因

⚙️ 外部コマンド (1)
SKILL.md:41
🌐 ネットワークアクセス (2)
SKILL.md:40 SKILL.md:41
最新の完了済み静的・セマンティック監査では、確認済みのセキュリティ検出事項は見つかりませんでした。これは、スキルに副作用がないことを証明するものではありません。
監査者: codex
このレポートを共有・引用

バージョン付き評価レポート、中立的なバッジ、埋め込みカード、引用を共有できます。Skillstore は証拠を報告しますが、この Skill が安全かどうかは判断しません。

バージョン別レポートを開く
セキュリティ評価

レポートリンクをコピー

https://skillstore.io/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdownバッジ

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTMLバッジ

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

埋め込みカード

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
学術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA形式の引用

shreyam1008. (2026). code-quality security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/audits/1

BibTeX形式の引用

@techreport{shreyam1008-shreyam1008-code-quality-2026, author = {shreyam1008}, title = {code-quality security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "code-quality security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "shreyam1008" date-released: "2026-10-02" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:shreyam1008-code-quality:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

バリアントを比較

インストール可能なバリアント 2 件

各作者のスキルは個別のインストール項目として維持されます。推奨バリアントは Skillstore の証拠で順位付けされます。

このバリアントが首位の理由

証拠の信頼度が高い
CrazySwami 推奨

crazyswami-code-quality

Skillstore スコア 78
証拠の信頼度 高
Skillstore 利用状況 10
更新済み

2026-09-09

shreyam1008 現在

shreyam1008-code-quality

Skillstore スコア 78
証拠の信頼度 中
Skillstore 利用状況 7
更新済み

2026-10-04

Skillstore スコア

このスコアの理由 証拠の信頼度: 中
55
アーキテクチャ
85
保守性
87
コンテンツ
65
コミュニティ
91
仕様準拠

作成できるもの

Review a Feature Change

Check changed code for failure paths, boundary conditions, and broken public contracts before merging.

Simplify Legacy Logic

Trace tangled behavior and remove unnecessary branches or indirection only when callers and tests justify the change.

Investigate Asynchronous Failures

Review state ownership, retries, cancellation, and partial writes to identify inconsistent transitions and meaningful regression tests.

これらのプロンプトを試す

Review One Function 
Review [function or file] for correctness and readability. Trace one representative input and report actionable findings with consequences and locations.
Simplify a Module 
Simplify [module] while preserving its public contract and error behavior. Check callers, use existing repository conventions, and validate changed behavior with relevant tests.
Evaluate Dependency Removal 
Evaluate removing [dependency or abstraction]. Identify callers, compare replacement behavior and maintenance cost, and propose a focused patch only when evidence supports removal.
Review Concurrent State Changes 
Review [workflow] for retries, cancellation, stale results, and partial writes. Trace state transitions, preserve security checks, and reproduce failures before proposing tested fixes.

ベストプラクティス

  • Provide the requested change, relevant callers, public contracts, and existing tests before starting a review.
  • Reproduce reported failures when feasible and validate meaningful failure paths after making changes.
  • Keep changes focused and preserve security checks, accessibility, compatibility, and error recovery.

回避

  • Treating a smaller line count as proof of correctness or maintainability.
  • Removing abstractions or dependencies without checking callers and behavior contracts.
  • Combining unrelated cleanup with a focused fix or compressing readable logic into clever expressions.

よくある質問

When should I use this skill?
Use it for requested code reviews, refactors, dependency cleanup, or investigation of tangled logic. It is not a default checklist for every small edit.
Does this skill include an automated analyzer?
No. It contains review and simplification instructions, with no executable analyzer or bundled scripts.
Will it always remove abstractions?
No. It preserves abstractions that express real boundaries, ownership rules, testing needs, or variation.
How does it handle testing?
It guides appropriate checks, failure reproduction when feasible, and behavior-level tests covering meaningful failure paths.
Can it replace a dedicated security review?
No. It includes sensitive-path checks but directs security-focused work to a security-specific review.
Does it require a fixed report format?
No. Reviews prioritize actionable findings with consequences and locations. Edit reports summarize simplification, preserved behavior, validation, and remaining tradeoffs.

開発者情報

作成者

shreyam1008

ライセンス

MIT

Skillstore リビジョン

r1

バージョンに関する注意

作者はバージョンを宣言していません。

リポジトリ

https://github.com/shreyam1008/shre-skills/tree/ba9787f41c2fe1be1062eeb6322bc339a1026383/skills/code-quality

参照

bbec03cf10354f3aaccd6dd24eda4ac9ceeceac5

メンテナンスの新しさ

2026/10/2

利用状況

0 ダウンロード · 0 閲覧

ファイル構成

📄 SKILL.md