監査履歴
peer-review - 5 監査
監査バージョン 5
最新 低リスクJan 21, 2026, 05:36 PM
All 106 static findings are false positives. The skill is a scientific peer review documentation tool. Detected 'C2 keywords' are false positives from legitimate terms like 'command-line'. 'Weak cryptographic algorithm' references are educational content in reference materials for evaluating manuscript methodology. Backtick patterns are markdown code formatting in documentation examples. No actual malicious code execution patterns exist.
リスク要因
🌐 ネットワークアクセス (14)
監査バージョン 4
中リスクJan 17, 2026, 07:16 AM
AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.
リスク要因
🌐 ネットワークアクセス (14)
検出されたパターン
監査バージョン 3
中リスクJan 17, 2026, 07:16 AM
AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.
リスク要因
🌐 ネットワークアクセス (14)
検出されたパターン
監査バージョン 2
安全Jan 12, 2026, 04:26 PM
All 94 static findings are FALSE POSITIVES. This is a documentation-only skill containing markdown reference materials for scientific peer review. The static analyzer misidentified documentation text (e.g., 'hardcoded URLs' that are reference links, 'shell backticks' that are markdown code examples) as security issues. There is no executable code, no network calls, no command execution - only documentation content.
リスク要因
🌐 ネットワークアクセス (13)
監査バージョン 1
安全Jan 4, 2026, 05:33 PM
No credential access, environment harvesting, or network exfiltration patterns detected. Content is instructional and aligned with peer review tasks.