Compétences code-quality
📩

code-quality

RĂ©vision du contenu r1 SĂ»r ⚙ Commandes externes🌐 AccĂšs rĂ©seau

Review and Simplify Code Without Losing Correctness

Complex logic and unnecessary abstractions make code harder to maintain and can hide failures. This skill guides focused reviews and refactors that preserve behavior, public contracts, and security checks.

Prend en charge: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it đŸ„‰ 78 Bronze

Installer avec mon Agent

Copiez cette demande dans votre Agent. Elle contient la page Skill de référence et le manifeste.

Demande d’agent
Review the Skillstore skill "code-quality" from https://skillstore.io/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Votre Agent doit toujours présenter son plan et demander toute confirmation exigée par la politique de sécurité.

Ressources lisibles par les agents

Utilisez ces liens lorsqu’un Agent IA, un crawler ou un script a besoin d’un contexte propre au lieu de lire toute la page.

Détail Markdown GET /skills/shreyam1008-code-quality.md manifest signé GET /api/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/manifest lockfile signé GET /api/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/lockfile

Tester

Utilisation de « code-quality ». Review a search workflow where an earlier request can complete after a later request.

RĂ©sultat attendu:

  • Finding: an older response can overwrite the current search results.
  • Consequence: users can see results that do not match their latest query.
  • Recommendation: accept results only when they belong to the current request.
  • Validation: test responses completing in reverse order and cancellation during an active request.

Utilisation de « code-quality ». Assess whether a wrapper around a standard parser can be removed.

RĂ©sultat attendu:

  • Check callers for custom defaults, error handling, and compatibility requirements before removing the wrapper.
  • Replace the wrapper only when the standard parser preserves the required behavior.
  • Validate empty inputs, malformed inputs, and failure contracts.
  • Keep the wrapper when it represents a real ownership or compatibility boundary.

Audit de sécurité

Sûr
v1 ‱ 02/10/2026 Ouvrir le rapport versionnĂ©

All three static findings are false positives: Markdown inline formatting and reference links do not execute commands or initiate network requests. No evidence found of prompt injection, data exfiltration, or malicious instructions in the reviewed SKILL.md.

1
Fichiers analysés
42
Lignes analysées
0
ÉlĂ©ments Ă  examiner
0
Faux positifs ignorés

Facteurs de risque

⚙ Commandes externes (1)
SKILL.md:41
🌐 AccĂšs rĂ©seau (2)
SKILL.md:40 SKILL.md:41
Le dernier audit statique et sĂ©mantique terminĂ© n’a dĂ©tectĂ© aucun constat de sĂ©curitĂ© confirmĂ©. Cela ne prouve pas que le skill est sans effets secondaires.
Audité par: codex
Partager et citer ce rapport

Partagez le rapport d’évaluation versionnĂ©, le badge neutre, la carte intĂ©grable et les citations. Skillstore prĂ©sente les preuves sans dĂ©cider si ce Skill est sĂ»r.

Ouvrir le rapport versionné
Évaluation de sĂ©curitĂ©

Copier le lien du rapport

https://skillstore.io/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Badge Markdown

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

Badge HTML

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Carte intégrable

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Citations académiques (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

Citation APA

shreyam1008. (2026). code-quality security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/audits/1

Citation BibTeX

@techreport{shreyam1008-shreyam1008-code-quality-2026, author = {shreyam1008}, title = {code-quality security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "code-quality security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "shreyam1008" date-released: "2026-10-02" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/shreyam1008-code-quality/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:shreyam1008-code-quality:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Comparer les variantes

2 variantes installables

Chaque auteur reste un skill installable distinct. La variante recommandée est classée selon les preuves Skillstore.

Pourquoi cette variante est premiĂšre

Confiance des preuves plus forte
CrazySwami Recommandé

crazyswami-code-quality

Score Skillstore 78
Niveau de confiance des preuves ÉlevĂ©
Utilisation Skillstore 10
Mis Ă  jour

2026-09-09

shreyam1008 Actuelle

shreyam1008-code-quality

Score Skillstore 78
Niveau de confiance des preuves Moyen
Utilisation Skillstore 7
Mis Ă  jour

2026-10-04

Score Skillstore

Pourquoi ce score Niveau de confiance des preuves: Moyen
55
Architecture
85
Maintenabilité
87
Contenu
65
Communauté
91
Conformité aux spécifications

Ce que vous pouvez créer

Review a Feature Change

Check changed code for failure paths, boundary conditions, and broken public contracts before merging.

Simplify Legacy Logic

Trace tangled behavior and remove unnecessary branches or indirection only when callers and tests justify the change.

Investigate Asynchronous Failures

Review state ownership, retries, cancellation, and partial writes to identify inconsistent transitions and meaningful regression tests.

Essayez ces prompts

Review One Function 
Review [function or file] for correctness and readability. Trace one representative input and report actionable findings with consequences and locations.
Simplify a Module 
Simplify [module] while preserving its public contract and error behavior. Check callers, use existing repository conventions, and validate changed behavior with relevant tests.
Evaluate Dependency Removal 
Evaluate removing [dependency or abstraction]. Identify callers, compare replacement behavior and maintenance cost, and propose a focused patch only when evidence supports removal.
Review Concurrent State Changes 
Review [workflow] for retries, cancellation, stale results, and partial writes. Trace state transitions, preserve security checks, and reproduce failures before proposing tested fixes.

Bonnes pratiques

  • Provide the requested change, relevant callers, public contracts, and existing tests before starting a review.
  • Reproduce reported failures when feasible and validate meaningful failure paths after making changes.
  • Keep changes focused and preserve security checks, accessibility, compatibility, and error recovery.

Éviter

  • Treating a smaller line count as proof of correctness or maintainability.
  • Removing abstractions or dependencies without checking callers and behavior contracts.
  • Combining unrelated cleanup with a focused fix or compressing readable logic into clever expressions.

Foire aux questions

When should I use this skill?
Use it for requested code reviews, refactors, dependency cleanup, or investigation of tangled logic. It is not a default checklist for every small edit.
Does this skill include an automated analyzer?
No. It contains review and simplification instructions, with no executable analyzer or bundled scripts.
Will it always remove abstractions?
No. It preserves abstractions that express real boundaries, ownership rules, testing needs, or variation.
How does it handle testing?
It guides appropriate checks, failure reproduction when feasible, and behavior-level tests covering meaningful failure paths.
Can it replace a dedicated security review?
No. It includes sensitive-path checks but directs security-focused work to a security-specific review.
Does it require a fixed report format?
No. Reviews prioritize actionable findings with consequences and locations. Edit reports summarize simplification, preserved behavior, validation, and remaining tradeoffs.

Détails du développeur

Licence

MIT

RĂ©vision Skillstore

r1

Avis de version

L’auteur n’a dĂ©clarĂ© aucune version.

DĂ©pĂŽt

https://github.com/shreyam1008/shre-skills/tree/ba9787f41c2fe1be1062eeb6322bc339a1026383/skills/code-quality

RĂ©f

bbec03cf10354f3aaccd6dd24eda4ac9ceeceac5

RĂ©cence de maintenance

02/10/2026

Utilisation

0 téléchargements · 0 vues

Structure de fichiers

📄 SKILL.md