last30days
Research Recent Community Discussions
Recent discussions are scattered across social platforms and public websites. This skill gathers recent evidence, compares engagement, and produces cited research with source coverage.
No instales este Skill automáticamente.
La política canónica exige la revisión de un operador antes de cualquier acción de instalación.
Instalar con mi Agente
Copia esta solicitud en tu Agente. Incluye la página canónica del Skill y el manifiesto.
Review the Skillstore skill "last30days" from https://skillstore.io/skills/mvanhorn-last30days.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/mvanhorn-last30days/manifest. Verify the artifact. Do not auto-install. Inspect the skill and report your findings, then wait for an operator or manual installation decision.Tu Agente debe seguir mostrando su plan y solicitar cualquier confirmación exigida por la política de seguridad.
Recursos legibles por agentes
Usa estos enlaces cuando un agente de IA, crawler o script necesite contexto limpio en vez de leer la página completa.
Pruébalo
Usando "last30days". Research recent feedback about a developer tool.
Resultado esperado:
- Illustrative structure only, not live research results.
- Key themes: recurring praise, reported problems, and areas with insufficient evidence.
- Evidence: attributed comments, source links, dates, and engagement where available.
- Coverage: sources that completed, returned partial results, or could not be reached.
Usando "last30days". Compare two products and prepare a local brief.
Resultado esperado:
- Illustrative structure only, not a completed comparison.
- Quick verdict: evidence-backed tradeoffs for the requested use case.
- Per-product findings: strengths and complaints supported by separate citations.
- Deliverable: a local HTML brief, with a saved location only when creation succeeds.
Auditoría de seguridad
CríticoAll 400 presented findings were adjudicated; many are lexical false positives, but remote shell installers and browser credential access remain real risks. Semantic review identified consent bypass, cross-provider token disclosure, and deliberate scanner-visibility reductions; no audit-directed prompt injection evidence was found. The analyzer omitted 4,034 additional matches, which remain unconfirmed and require manual review before automatic publication. Static review was capped at 400/4434 representative findings; omitted static matches are unconfirmed, so automatic publishing stays disabled until manual review.
Preocupaciones de seguridad confirmadas (18)
Mostrar los 18 problemas confirmados
Elementos de revisión de capacidades (8)
Estas son capacidades locales reales que pueden esperarse para esta habilidad, por lo que requieren revisión, pero no se cuentan como comportamiento malicioso confirmado.
Factores de riesgo
📁 Acceso al sistema de archivos (50)
⚙️ Comandos externos (50)
🔑 Variables de entorno (50)
🌐 Acceso a red (50)
Patrones detectados
Compartir y citar este informe
Comparte el informe de evaluación versionado, la insignia neutral, la tarjeta insertable y las citas. Skillstore presenta evidencias sin decidir si este Skill es seguro.
Copiar enlace del informe
https://skillstore.io/skills/mvanhorn-last30days/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportInsignia Markdown
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/mvanhorn-last30days?utm_source=security_passport_badge)Insignia HTML
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/mvanhorn-last30days?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/mvanhorn-last30days/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Tarjeta para insertar
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/mvanhorn-last30days.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Citas académicas (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
Cita APA
mvanhorn. (2026). last30days security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 3.30.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/mvanhorn-last30days/audits/1Cita BibTeX
@techreport{mvanhorn-mvanhorn-last30days-2026,
author = {mvanhorn},
title = {last30days security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/mvanhorn-last30days/audits/1},
note = {Author version 3.30.0}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "last30days security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "3.30.0"
type: report
authors:
- name: "mvanhorn"
date-released: "2026-10-25"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/mvanhorn-last30days/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:mvanhorn-last30days:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Comparar variantes
2 variantes instalablesCada autor sigue siendo un skill instalable independiente. La variante recomendada se ordena según la evidencia de Skillstore.
Por qué esta variante es la primera
sickn33-last30days
2026-09-09
mvanhorn-last30days
2026-10-25
Puntuación de Skillstore
Por qué esta puntuación Confianza de la evidencia: BajoLo que puedes crear
Evaluate Developer Tool Feedback
Compare recent discussions about two frameworks and identify recurring strengths, complaints, and unresolved questions.
Track Product and Competitor Reactions
Collect recent community reactions to a product launch and compare them with named competitors.
Find Evidence for Editorial Topics
Discover current discussion topics and review attributed comments before selecting an article or podcast angle.
Prueba estos prompts
/last30days Research recent discussions about [topic] from the last 30 days. Cite the evidence and state coverage gaps.
/last30days Research [product] on Reddit and Hacker News. Group recurring complaints and praise, include attributed comments, and distinguish evidence from interpretation.
/last30days Compare [product A] versus [product B] over the last 30 days. Separate each product's evidence and explain tradeoffs with citations.
/last30days Research [topic] with my local notes at [directory]. Keep document contents local and produce a local HTML brief without publishing.
Mejores prácticas
- Name the topic, date window, and required sources. Inspect coverage before interpreting missing results.
- Use dedicated provider credentials and avoid browser-backed access until the reported consent issues are resolved.
- Verify important claims against cited sources and approve credit spending or public publishing separately.
Evitar
- Treating partial retrieval or authentication failure as proof that nobody discussed a topic.
- Pasting unrelated provider credentials or running unverified remote installation commands.
- Publishing private notes or saved research without explicit authorization and an access review.
Preguntas frecuentes
Does every source need an API key?
Does it guarantee complete 30-day coverage?
Can research incur charges?
Can it read browser sessions?
Can I include private local documents?
Are reports published automatically?
Detalles del desarrollador
Autor
mvanhornLicencia
MIT
Versión del autor
v3.30.0
Revisión de Skillstore
r1
Repositorio
https://github.com/mvanhorn/last30days-skill/tree/f3cd06a620e385ce15109ed6d3b70fc20c89eccc/skills/last30daysRef.
f235fd0d05aad155ada09449398e238597b5b345
Actualidad del mantenimiento
25/10/2026
Uso
0 descargas · 0 vistas