Challenge Engineering Decisions Before They Stand
Long sessions can turn assumptions into accepted facts and hide costly failure modes. This skill applies bounded, fresh-context adversarial review before non-trivial decisions stand.
Detente y solicita confirmación antes de instalar.
Revisa el plan y obtén el consentimiento explícito del usuario antes de modificar archivos.
Copia esta solicitud en tu Agente. Incluye la página canónica del Skill y el manifiesto.
Review the Skillstore skill "doubt-driven-development" from https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-doubt-driven-development.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/addyosmani-doubt-driven-development/manifest. Verify the artifact. Stop and obtain explicit user consent before installing or changing files.Tu Agente debe seguir mostrando su plan y solicitar cualquier confirmación exigida por la política de seguridad.
Usa estos enlaces cuando un agente de IA, crawler o script necesite contexto limpio en vez de leer la página completa.
Usando "doubt-driven-development". Review a proposal to add shared in-memory caching to a concurrent service.
Resultado esperado:
Usando "doubt-driven-development". Challenge a database migration plan that removes a legacy column.
Resultado esperado:
Usando "doubt-driven-development". Reconcile feedback about a public API pagination change.
Resultado esperado:
Accepted trade-off: Existing clients keep the old default for one release. Document the compatibility period and add a removal checkpoint.
Most static alerts are false positives caused by Markdown backticks, code fences, ordinary prose, or documentation links. The fixed files in /tmp create local confidentiality and integrity risk, while cross-model review can expose sensitive artifacts or let untrusted artifact instructions influence a CLI reviewer.
Estas son capacidades locales reales que pueden esperarse para esta habilidad, por lo que requieren revisión, pero no se cuentan como comportamiento malicioso confirmado.
Comparte el informe de evaluación versionado, la insignia neutral, la tarjeta insertable y las citas. Skillstore presenta evidencias sin decidir si este Skill es seguro.
https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-doubt-driven-development/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report[](https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-doubt-driven-development?utm_source=security_passport_badge)<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-doubt-driven-development?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/addyosmani-doubt-driven-development/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a><iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/addyosmani-doubt-driven-development.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>addyosmani. (2026). doubt-driven-development security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-doubt-driven-development/audits/1@techreport{addyosmani-addyosmani-doubt-driven-development-2026,
author = {addyosmani},
title = {doubt-driven-development security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-doubt-driven-development/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "doubt-driven-development security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "addyosmani"
date-released: "2026-09-19"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/addyosmani-doubt-driven-development/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:addyosmani-doubt-driven-development:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Challenge service boundaries, shared state, failure modes, and unstated assumptions before implementation begins.
Test authentication, authorization, or data-handling changes against an explicit contract before committing.
Expose irreversible steps, rollback gaps, and hidden dependencies before approving a production migration.
Apply doubt-driven development to this decision. State the claim, extract the artifact and contract, then find assumptions and failure modes.
Review this change against its contract. Focus on edge cases, hidden state, broken conventions, and inputs that violate expected behavior.
Classify each finding as contract misread, actionable issue, accepted trade-off, or noise. Cite artifact evidence and recommend the next step.
Run up to three doubt cycles on this high-stakes artifact. Track changed assumptions, unresolved findings, accepted trade-offs, and the final stop condition.
Autor
addyosmaniLicencia
MIT
Revisión de Skillstore
r1
Aviso de versión
El autor no declaró una versión.
Ref.
5d5054f8a23586f9b500fece1cb613a9dffc787b
Actualidad del mantenimiento
19/9/2026
Uso
0 descargas · 0 vistas
Estructura de archivos
📄 SKILL.md
Clarify User Intent Before You Build
Underspecified requests cause teams to build the wrong outcome and discover misalignment late. This skill runs a focused, one-question interview that turns ambiguity into confirmed intent.
Revisar código según cinco ejes de calidad
Los cambios de código pueden ocultar problemas de corrección, seguridad, arquitectura, legibilidad y rendimiento. Esta habilidad aplica un proceso de revisión estructurado y genera comentarios priorizados y prácticos.
Plan Work Into Verifiable Tasks
Large or vague software work can hide dependencies, missing acceptance criteria, and verification gaps. This skill converts a specification into ordered task slices with checkpoints, scope guidance, and clear completion conditions.
Document Decisions and Architecture Clearly
Teams lose context when important technical decisions remain in chat, code comments, or individual memory. This skill turns architectural reasoning, API guidance, project instructions, and release changes into structured documentation.
Build Accessible, Production-Ready Frontends
Frontend work can become inconsistent, inaccessible, or difficult to maintain. This skill guides component architecture, responsive layouts, state handling, and polished user experiences.
Harden Applications Against Security Risks
Security reviews can miss trust boundaries and unsafe data flows. This skill supplies threat-modeling prompts, OWASP patterns, and practical review checklists.
Mejora las revisiones de código con una guía estructurada
por ArieGoldkin
Las revisiones inconsistentes pasan por alto defectos y generan comentarios poco claros para los autores. Esta skill proporciona listas de comprobación, formatos de comentarios y plantillas para revisiones fiables de pull requests.
Review Defects and Verify Root-Cause Repairs
por aakashh242
Reviews can miss failure conditions or accept fixes without reliable evidence. Gauntlet guides scoped adversarial reviews, authorized repairs, and revision-bound verification within a finite budget.
Audit NestJS Code with Evidence-Backed Findings
por amirtaherkhani
NestJS repositories can hide boundary flaws and runtime risks that lint results alone cannot reveal. This skill combines local evidence collection and semantic review into one prioritized report.
Revisar código con controles de calidad estructurados
por alirezarezvani
Las revisiones de código pueden pasar por alto problemas de calidad, seguridad y mantenibilidad. Esta skill guía revisiones estructuradas con scripts, listas de comprobación y generación de informes.
Gestionar flujos de trabajo de agentes de codificación
por kiwi-phantomworks
Los proyectos con agentes de codificación pueden desviarse cuando las tareas, el alcance y las comprobaciones son imprecisos. Esta skill proporciona plantillas de PM y reglas de revisión que mantienen el trabajo de Claude, Codex y Claude Code acotado y verificable.
Revisar Código para Detectar Errores y Problemas de Seguridad
por 21pounder
Las revisiones de código pueden pasar por alto errores, fallos de seguridad y problemas de mantenibilidad. Esta habilidad guía a Claude, Codex y Claude Code mediante pasos de revisión estructurados.