📦

code-reviewer

Name: code-reviewer
Author: zhaobolun-code

Inhaltsrevision r1 Sicher ⚙️ Externe Befehle📁 Dateisystemzugriff

Review Code Changes with Evidence

Code reviews can miss blockers, regressions, and unverified claims. This skill guides a focused, evidence-based review of the relevant change set.

Unterstützt: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 77 Bronze

Mit meinem Agent installieren

Kopieren Sie diese Anfrage in Ihren Agent. Sie enthält die maßgebliche Skill-Seite und das Manifest.

Agent-Anfrage

Review the Skillstore skill "code-reviewer" from https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Ihr Agent sollte weiterhin seinen Plan anzeigen und alle von der Sicherheitsrichtlinie verlangten Bestätigungen anfordern.

Agent-lesbare Ressourcen

Verwenden Sie diese Links, wenn ein KI-Agent, Crawler oder Skript sauberen Kontext benötigt, statt die vollständige Seite zu lesen.

Markdown-Detailseite GET /skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer.md Signiertes manifest GET /api/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/manifest Signiertes lockfile GET /api/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/lockfile

Testen

„code-reviewer“ wird verwendet. Review a change that modifies authentication validation.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

Change summary: Validation now rejects expired sessions.
Blocker: A refresh path still accepts an expired token.
Verification gap: No test result was provided for the refresh path.

„code-reviewer“ wird verwendet. Re-review a bug fix after developer feedback.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

Change summary: The null check was added in the requested method.
Major: A neighboring caller still passes an invalid value.
Remaining risk: The integration scenario needs a focused test.

Sicherheitsaudit

Sicher

v1 • 17.9.2026 Versionsbericht öffnen

All 35 static findings are false positives. The backtick matches are Markdown inline-code spans in a Chinese-language review instruction file, and the `../` matches are static relative links to sibling documentation, so there is no command execution or path traversal. The entropy alert reflects UTF-8 Chinese prose. No prompt injection, network access, data exfiltration, or malicious intent was found.

Gescannte Dateien

Analysierte Zeilen

Prüfelemente

Falschmeldungen ignoriert

Risikofaktoren

Das letzte abgeschlossene statische und semantische Audit erkannte keine bestätigten Sicherheitsbefunde. Dies beweist nicht, dass der Skill keine Nebenwirkungen hat.

Geprüft von: claude

Diesen Bericht teilen & zitieren

Teile den versionierten Bewertungsbericht, das neutrale Badge, die Einbettungskarte und Zitate. Skillstore berichtet Nachweise, ohne zu entscheiden, ob dieser Skill sicher ist.

Versionsbericht öffnen

Berichtslink kopieren

https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown-Badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML-Badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Einbettungskarte

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

Wissenschaftliche Zitate (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA-Zitat

zhaobolun-code. (2026). code-reviewer security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/audits/1

BibTeX-Zitat

@techreport{zhaobolun-code-zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer-2026,
  author = {zhaobolun-code},
  title = {code-reviewer security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "code-reviewer security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "zhaobolun-code"
date-released: "2026-09-17"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Varianten vergleichen

10 installierbare Varianten

Jeder Autor bleibt ein eigener installierbarer Skill. Die empfohlene Variante wird nach Skillstore-Nachweisen bewertet.

Warum diese Variante zuerst steht

Höhere Skillstore-Nutzung

Autor / Quelle Skillstore-Score Evidenzvertrauen Skillstore-Nutzung Aktualisiert

alirezarezvani Empfohlen

alirezarezvani-code-reviewer

Skillstore-Score 83

Evidenzvertrauen Hoch

Skillstore-Nutzung 373

Aktualisiert

2026-09-09

AutumnsGrove

autumnsgrove-code-reviewer

Skillstore-Score 83

Evidenzvertrauen Hoch

Skillstore-Nutzung 79

Aktualisiert

2026-09-09

davila7

davila7-code-reviewer

Skillstore-Score 81

Evidenzvertrauen Hoch

Skillstore-Nutzung 13

Aktualisiert

2026-09-09

CuriousLearner

curiouslearner-code-reviewer

Skillstore-Score 78

Evidenzvertrauen Hoch

Skillstore-Nutzung 54

Aktualisiert

2026-09-09

sickn33

sickn33-code-reviewer

Skillstore-Score 78

Evidenzvertrauen Hoch

Skillstore-Nutzung 20

Aktualisiert

2026-09-09

9tykeshav

9tykeshav-code-reviewer

Skillstore-Score 78

Evidenzvertrauen Hoch

Skillstore-Nutzung 17

Aktualisiert

2026-09-09

DennisLiuCk

dennisliuck-code-reviewer

Skillstore-Score 78

Evidenzvertrauen Hoch

Skillstore-Nutzung 16

Aktualisiert

2026-09-09

google-gemini

google-gemini-code-reviewer

Skillstore-Score 78

Evidenzvertrauen Hoch

Skillstore-Nutzung 13

Aktualisiert

2026-09-09

shubhamsaboo

shubhamsaboo-code-reviewer

Skillstore-Score 77

Evidenzvertrauen Mittel

Skillstore-Nutzung 7

Aktualisiert

2026-09-09

zhaobolun-code Aktuell

zhaobolun-code-code-reviewer

Skillstore-Score 77

Evidenzvertrauen Mittel

Skillstore-Nutzung 1

Aktualisiert

2026-09-18

Skillstore-Score

Warum dieser Score Evidenzvertrauen: Mittel

Architektur

Wartbarkeit

Inhalt

Gemeinschaft

Spezifikationskonformität

Was Sie erstellen können

Review a pull request

Identify release-blocking defects and regression risks before merging a focused change.

Check a repair round

Review only the latest fixes and confirm whether earlier findings were addressed.

Assess delivery evidence

Check whether claimed validation has supporting commands, outputs, and scope.

Diese Prompts ausprobieren

Beginner: review my change

Review my current code changes. List blockers and regression risks with evidence.

Focused pull request review

Review this pull request against its stated requirements. Prioritize defects that could block merging.

Re-review a fix

Re-review only the changes made since the previous review. Confirm which earlier findings remain.

Advanced dual-axis review

Perform a standards and specification review of this change. Group findings by axis and include integration risks.

Bewährte Praktiken

Provide the change scope, requirements, and relevant test results before requesting review.
Address blocker and major findings before requesting a re-review.
Use a focused re-review after fixes instead of repeating the entire review.

Vermeiden

Do not request a review without identifying the change set or expected behavior.
Do not treat a review as proof that tests and runtime validation succeeded.
Do not use minor style preferences as merge blockers.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Does this skill change my code?

No. It reviews changes and reports findings by default.

What should I provide for a review?

Provide the change scope, requirements, and available validation evidence.

Can it review a pull request?

Yes. Ask it to review the pull request against its requirements and change set.

Can it re-review a fix?

Yes. It can focus on changes made since the earlier review.

Does it run tests automatically?

No. It evaluates reported evidence and identifies validation gaps.

Does it perform a security review?

Security checks are used for Full reviews or when you explicitly request security coverage.

Entwicklerdetails

Autor

zhaobolun-code

Lizenz

MIT

Skillstore-Revision

Versionshinweis

Der Autor hat keine Version angegeben.

Repository

https://github.com/zhaobolun-code/ai-gates/tree/4d3e84b41403bba7e03148927324e7213a699629/.ai-gates/skills/code-reviewer

Ref.

9be34bdd3e1cb2f1280ccd11fa00419204fc4d81

Aktualität der Wartung

18.9.2026

Nutzung

0 Downloads · 0 Aufrufe

Dateistruktur

📁 agents/

📄 openai.yaml

📄 SKILL.md