Fähigkeiten research
📦

research

Inhaltsrevision r1 Sicher ⚙️ Externe Befehle

Delegate Broad Codebase Research

Large investigations can flood the primary agent context with irrelevant files and logs. This skill delegates read-only research and returns concise conclusions with cited evidence.

Unterstützt: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 Bronze

Mit meinem Agent installieren

Kopieren Sie diese Anfrage in Ihren Agent. Sie enthält die maßgebliche Skill-Seite und das Manifest.

Agent-Anfrage
Review the Skillstore skill "research" from https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/warpdotdev-research/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Ihr Agent sollte weiterhin seinen Plan anzeigen und alle von der Sicherheitsrichtlinie verlangten Bestätigungen anfordern.

Agent-lesbare Ressourcen

Verwenden Sie diese Links, wenn ein KI-Agent, Crawler oder Skript sauberen Kontext benötigt, statt die vollständige Seite zu lesen.

Markdown-Detailseite GET /skills/warpdotdev-research.md Signiertes manifest GET /api/skills/warpdotdev-research/manifest Signiertes lockfile GET /api/skills/warpdotdev-research/lockfile

Testen

„research“ wird verwendet. Find the root cause of this failing integration test and cite the relevant implementation and test locations.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

  • Root cause: The retry handler converts the timeout into a permanent failure.
  • Evidence: The report identifies the handler and failing test locations.
  • Caveat: External service behavior was not reproduced locally.

„research“ wird verwendet. Summarize this large pull request, including behavior changes, risks, and test coverage.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

  • Change: The request pipeline now validates credentials before loading account data.
  • Risk: Existing clients with incomplete credentials may fail earlier.
  • Coverage: Unit tests cover validation, but migration behavior remains untested.

„research“ wird verwendet. Explain how session recovery works across the repository and identify the main call sites.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

  • Flow: Recovery starts after connection loss, restores persisted state, and reconnects active sessions.
  • Evidence: The summary lists the coordinator, persistence layer, and reconnect entry points.
  • Unknown: Concurrent recovery behavior requires runtime verification.

Sicherheitsaudit

Sicher
v1 • 4.9.2026 Versionsbericht öffnen

All five static findings are false positives. Four are Markdown inline-code spans, while line 36 discusses subagent costs without performing reconnaissance. No prompt injection, command execution, or semantic security issue was found.

1
Gescannte Dateien
72
Analysierte Zeilen
0
Prüfelemente
0
Falschmeldungen ignoriert

Risikofaktoren

⚙️ Externe Befehle (4)
SKILL.md:27 SKILL.md:33 SKILL.md:44 SKILL.md:64
Das letzte abgeschlossene statische und semantische Audit erkannte keine bestätigten Sicherheitsbefunde. Dies beweist nicht, dass der Skill keine Nebenwirkungen hat.
Geprüft von: codex
Diesen Bericht teilen & zitieren

Teile den versionierten Bewertungsbericht, das neutrale Badge, die Einbettungskarte und Zitate. Skillstore berichtet Nachweise, ohne zu entscheiden, ob dieser Skill sicher ist.

Versionsbericht öffnen
Sicherheitsbewertung

Berichtslink kopieren

https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown-Badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/warpdotdev-research/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML-Badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/warpdotdev-research/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Einbettungskarte

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/warpdotdev-research.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Wissenschaftliche Zitate (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA-Zitat

warpdotdev. (2026). research security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research/audits/1

BibTeX-Zitat

@techreport{warpdotdev-warpdotdev-research-2026, author = {warpdotdev}, title = {research security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "research security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "warpdotdev" date-released: "2026-09-04" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/warpdotdev-research/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:warpdotdev-research:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Varianten vergleichen

2 installierbare Varianten

Jeder Autor bleibt ein eigener installierbarer Skill. Die empfohlene Variante wird nach Skillstore-Nachweisen bewertet.

Warum diese Variante zuerst steht

Höhere Skillstore-Nutzung
mattpocock Empfohlen

mattpocock-research

Skillstore-Score 77
Evidenzvertrauen Mittel
Skillstore-Nutzung 14
Aktualisiert

2026-09-09

warpdotdev Aktuell

warpdotdev-research

Skillstore-Score 77
Evidenzvertrauen Mittel
Skillstore-Nutzung 8
Aktualisiert

2026-09-09

Skillstore-Score

Warum dieser Score Evidenzvertrauen: Mittel
55
Architektur
85
Wartbarkeit
87
Inhalt
65
Gemeinschaft
83
Spezifikationskonformität

Was Sie erstellen können

Trace a complex test failure

Delegate inspection of long CI logs and related code, then receive the likely cause with supporting locations.

Summarize a large pull request

Review a substantial diff through a subagent and receive the main changes, rationale, risks, and evidence.

Survey an unfamiliar architecture

Map how a component or API is used across a repository without loading every inspected file into primary context.

Diese Prompts ausprobieren

Answer a repository question 
Investigate {question} in {repository_path}. Work read-only. Return a concise answer with exact file paths, symbols, and important caveats.
Diagnose a failure 
Analyze {log_or_test_failure} and trace the relevant code. Identify the root cause, cite supporting locations, and note anything not verified.
Review a large change 
Research {pull_request_or_diff}. Summarize behavioral changes, affected components, design rationale, risks, and tests. Support each major conclusion with file locations.
Coordinate independent investigations 
Investigate these independent areas in parallel: {area_one}, {area_two}, and {area_three}. Synthesize the results, preserve evidence, and identify cross-area uncertainties.

Bewährte Praktiken

  • Provide an exact question, repository path, and suspected files or symbols.
  • Keep investigations read-only unless the task explicitly requires changes.
  • Request concise conclusions, exact evidence locations, caveats, and unresolved questions.

Vermeiden

  • Do not delegate a single lookup or a few known file reads.
  • Do not delegate when the primary agent must edit the same files immediately.
  • Do not split one coherent investigation into artificial parallel tasks.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

When should I use this skill?
Use it when investigation requires many files, long logs, large diffs, or broad repository surveys.
When should I inspect files directly?
Inspect files directly for small lookups or when you need their contents for immediate edits.
Does the skill modify repository files?
The workflow is read-only by default. A task must explicitly request changes before a subagent should modify files.
Can it run several investigations at once?
Yes. Parallel subagents are appropriate only when the questions are independent and do not require shared intermediate findings.
What should a research report include?
It should include a direct answer, exact evidence locations, relevant symbols, caveats, and unresolved questions.
Which AI tools support this skill?
The report declares support for Claude, Codex, and Claude Code. Local subagent availability still depends on the host environment.

Entwicklerdetails

Lizenz

MIT

Skillstore-Revision

r1

Versionshinweis

Der Autor hat keine Version angegeben.

Repository

https://github.com/warpdotdev/common-skills/tree/b811c24365ae505bfc9646458957b886e29110b5/.agents/skills/research

Ref.

e5464e662405de6361fdde6b984f9ea865635f64

Aktualität der Wartung

8.9.2026

Nutzung

1 Downloads · 0 Aufrufe

Dateistruktur

📄 SKILL.md