Fähigkeiten brag-doc-from-git
📦

brag-doc-from-git

v1.0 Inhaltsrevision r1 Mittleres Risiko ⚙️ Externe Befehle

Build an Evidence-Based Brag Document from Git

Review preparation is difficult when contributions are scattered across pull requests, commits, and personal notes. This skill groups that evidence into a Markdown draft and marks missing results instead of inventing impact.

Unterstützt: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 📊 70 Angemessen

Mit meinem Agent installieren

Kopieren Sie diese Anfrage in Ihren Agent. Sie enthält die maßgebliche Skill-Seite und das Manifest.

Agent-Anfrage
Review the Skillstore skill "brag-doc-from-git" from https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

Ihr Agent sollte weiterhin seinen Plan anzeigen und alle von der Sicherheitsrichtlinie verlangten Bestätigungen anfordern.

Agent-lesbare Ressourcen

Verwenden Sie diese Links, wenn ein KI-Agent, Crawler oder Skript sauberen Kontext benötigt, statt die vollständige Seite zu lesen.

Testen

„brag-doc-from-git“ wird verwendet. Sample evidence: PR #42 added retry handling on March 12. No outcome metrics were provided.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

  • Theme: Reliability
  • What I did: Added retry handling.
  • Result: [GAP: What changed for users or the team?]
  • Evidence: March 12, supplied PR #42 reference.
  • Priority question: Do incident records show a change in failed requests after deployment?

„brag-doc-from-git“ wird verwendet. Sample notes: I owned the cache integration in a team project. User-provided measurements show response time fell from 240 ms to 180 ms.

Erwartetes Ergebnis:

  • Theme: Performance
  • What I did: Contributed the cache integration to a team performance project.
  • Result: User-provided measurements show response time decreased from 240 ms to 180 ms.
  • Scope signal: Owned the cache integration, not the entire project.
  • Evidence gap: Add the project link and measurement source.

Sicherheitsaudit

Mittleres Risiko
v2 • 22.10.2026 Versionsbericht öffnen

All six static findings are false positives from Markdown delimiters, inline examples, or legitimate review-writing instructions. The authenticated GitHub search lacks repository filters and can retrieve private repository metadata outside the user-approved scope. No evidence found of malicious intent, credential theft, destructive commands, or audit-directed prompt injection.

1
Gescannte Dateien
50
Analysierte Zeilen
0
Prüfelemente
0
Falschmeldungen ignoriert

Bestätigte Sicherheitsbedenken (1)

Mittel
Authenticated Search Exceeds Approved Repository Scope
The GitHub CLI search filters by author and merge date but not repository. It can retrieve private PR metadata from unnamed repositories, contradicting the explicit access restriction.
Line 19 has no repository filter despite the access restriction on line 24. Actual exposure depends on authenticated account permissions and matching PRs.
Geprüft von: codex Audit-Verlauf anzeigen →
Diesen Bericht teilen & zitieren

Teile den versionierten Bewertungsbericht, das neutrale Badge, die Einbettungskarte und Zitate. Skillstore berichtet Nachweise, ohne zu entscheiden, ob dieser Skill sicher ist.

Versionsbericht öffnen
Sicherheitsbewertung

Berichtslink kopieren

https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/audits/2?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown-Badge

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML-Badge

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

Einbettungskarte

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
Wissenschaftliche Zitate (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA-Zitat

agentkitco. (2026). brag-doc-from-git security audit report (audit version 2) [Author version 1.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/audits/2

BibTeX-Zitat

@techreport{agentkitco-agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git-2026, author = {agentkitco}, title = {brag-doc-from-git security audit report (audit version 2)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {2}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/audits/2}, note = {Author version 1.0} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "brag-doc-from-git security audit report (audit version 2)" version: "1.0" type: report authors: - name: "agentkitco" date-released: "2026-10-22" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/audits/2" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git:audit:2" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore-Score

Warum dieser Score Evidenzvertrauen: Mittel
55
Architektur
85
Wartbarkeit
87
Inhalt
65
Gemeinschaft
91
Spezifikationskonformität

Was Sie erstellen können

Prepare a Performance Self-Review

Group recent engineering contributions into evidence-backed themes and identify missing outcomes before submitting a review.

Assemble Promotion Evidence

Organize supported leadership, cross-team work, and technical contributions while preserving accurate ownership and evidence links.

Refresh Resume Accomplishments

Convert verified contributions into resume material and remove confidential details intended only for internal documents.

Diese Prompts ausprobieren

Start a Brag Document
Create a brag document for my last six months of work. Ask me which repositories to use before collecting evidence.
Review Local Contributions
Use local Git history in [repository] for [author email] since [date]. Group contributions by theme and mark unknown results as gaps.
Combine Code and Team Contributions
Draft my self-review for [date range] using only [approved repositories]. Restrict GitHub queries to those repositories. Include [mentoring and incident notes].
Prepare a Promotion Outline
Build a promotion outline from [approved evidence and notes]. Preserve team attribution, distinguish verified outcomes from gaps, and rank missing evidence. Ask three priority questions.

Bewährte Praktiken

  • Agree on the time window and repository list, then add explicit repository filters before running GitHub searches.
  • Provide outcome measurements, evidence links, and notes about contributions that Git does not record.
  • Review attribution and remove confidential information before sharing the draft outside your organization.

Vermeiden

  • Treating commit counts or pull request titles as proof of business impact.
  • Claiming sole ownership of team results without evidence of your specific contribution.
  • Running an unrestricted account-wide search when only named repositories are approved.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Which AI tools can use this skill?
The skill lists Claude, Codex, and Claude Code as supported tools.
Does it require GitHub?
No. It includes a local Git log alternative filtered by author and start date.
What happens when results are unknown?
The draft marks missing outcomes with visible gaps and ends with prioritized questions instead of inventing metrics.
Can it include mentoring and incident work?
Yes. It asks for user notes about mentoring, incidents, reviews, and other contributions that Git history may not capture.
Will it search only the repositories I name?
The prose requires that boundary, but the example command lacks repository filters. Add explicit filters before running it.
What formats can it produce?
It produces Markdown and offers to adapt the final document into a self-review, promotion packet outline, or resume bullets.

Entwicklerdetails

Lizenz

MIT

Autorenversion

v1.0

Skillstore-Revision

r1

Versionshinweis

Die vom Autor angegebene Version ist kein gültiges SemVer.

Ref.

18efac79a818d7e997295839638fdd21906cfd1c

Aktualität der Wartung

22.10.2026

Nutzung

5 Downloads · 1 Aufrufe

Dateistruktur

📄 SKILL.md

Mehr von agentkitco

Alle anzeigen
Alle anzeigen