review-my-diff
Review Your Diff Before Opening a Pull Request
Local changes can hide bugs, security gaps, and missing tests before human review. This skill guides an evidence-based review with prioritized findings and explicit verification results.
Mit meinem Agent installieren
Kopieren Sie diese Anfrage in Ihren Agent. Sie enthält die maßgebliche Skill-Seite und das Manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "review-my-diff" from https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Ihr Agent sollte weiterhin seinen Plan anzeigen und alle von der Sicherheitsrichtlinie verlangten Bestätigungen anfordern.
Agent-lesbare Ressourcen
Verwenden Sie diese Links, wenn ein KI-Agent, Crawler oder Skript sauberen Kontext benötigt, statt die vollständige Seite zu lesen.
Testen
„review-my-diff“ wird verwendet. Illustrative scenario: review a change that removes required input validation and adds no regression test.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
- Intent: simplify request processing.
- Checks run: none; this illustrative scenario provides no runnable repository.
- Blocker summary: required validation is missing, allowing invalid requests into processing.
- Suggested fix: restore validation and add a regression test.
- Recommendation: needs rework because invalid input is not rejected.
„review-my-diff“ wird verwendet. Illustrative scenario: review a small refactor where executed checks pass and inspection finds no actionable issue.
Erwartetes Ergebnis:
- Intent: reorganize existing logic without changing behavior.
- Checks run: the review lists the exact commands and passing results from the actual session.
- Blockers: nothing found.
- Should fix: nothing found.
- Looks good: existing behavior and regression coverage are preserved.
- Recommendation: ready for human review; this is not approval.
Sicherheitsaudit
SicherAll six static findings are false positives involving ordinary Git commands, Markdown formatting, or legitimate review instructions. No evidence found of credential theft, data exfiltration, malicious reconnaissance, or prompt injection. Running project checks executes repository code and requires a trusted environment.
Risikofaktoren
⚙️ Externe Befehle (3)
Diesen Bericht teilen & zitieren
Teile den versionierten Bewertungsbericht, das neutrale Badge, die Einbettungskarte und Zitate. Skillstore berichtet Nachweise, ohne zu entscheiden, ob dieser Skill sicher ist.
Berichtslink kopieren
https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/audits/2?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown-Badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML-Badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Einbettungskarte
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Wissenschaftliche Zitate (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA-Zitat
agentkitco. (2026). review-my-diff security audit report (audit version 2) [Author version 1.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/audits/2BibTeX-Zitat
@techreport{agentkitco-agentkitco-review-my-diff-2026,
author = {agentkitco},
title = {review-my-diff security audit report (audit version 2)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {2},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/audits/2},
note = {Author version 1.0}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "review-my-diff security audit report (audit version 2)"
version: "1.0"
type: report
authors:
- name: "agentkitco"
date-released: "2026-10-22"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/audits/2"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:agentkitco-review-my-diff:audit:2"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore-Score
Warum dieser Score Evidenzvertrauen: MittelWas Sie erstellen können
Check Local Changes Before a Pull Request
Review staged and unstaged changes for bugs, unsafe behavior, and missing tests before requesting feedback.
Inspect a Contributor Branch
Compare a contributor branch against its base and examine compatibility risks, surrounding callers, and test coverage.
Prioritize Review Work on Large Changes
Review a large diff by directory and separate blockers from smaller fixes, documenting coverage and unresolved questions.
Diese Prompts ausprobieren
Review my staged and unstaged changes before I open a pull request. Report prioritized findings with file and line evidence. Do not edit files.
Review this branch against the default branch using the merge base. State the intended change and check correctness, safety, and compatibility. Do not edit files.
Review my diff with attention to error handling, input validation, and missing regression tests. Run available quick checks and separate verified problems from suspicions.
Review this large branch by directory, tracing affected callers, public interfaces, configuration, and migrations. Document coverage, skipped checks, blockers, and questions. End with a readiness recommendation.
Bewährte Praktiken
- State the intended behavior and confirm the comparison base before reviewing branch changes.
- Use a trusted environment for project checks, since tests and development tools execute repository code.
- Require file and line evidence, exact check results, and explicit disclosure of unreviewed areas.
Vermeiden
- Requesting automatic approval or treating the recommendation as a substitute for human review.
- Assuming a review edits files or fixes reported issues without an explicit request.
- Accepting unsupported findings or assuming that unreported tests passed.
Häufig gestellte Fragen
Which changes can this skill review?
Does it modify my files?
Does it run tests?
How are findings organized?
Can it handle a large diff?
Does a ready recommendation approve my pull request?
Entwicklerdetails
Autor
agentkitcoLizenz
MIT
Autorenversion
v1.0
Skillstore-Revision
r2
Versionshinweis
Die vom Autor angegebene Version ist kein gültiges SemVer.
Ref.
18efac79a818d7e997295839638fdd21906cfd1c
Aktualität der Wartung
22.10.2026
Nutzung
6 Downloads · 0 Aufrufe
Dateistruktur
📄 SKILL.md