plan-reviewer
Review Execution Plans Before Coding Starts
Execution plans often pass review while still missing acceptance criteria, deltas, or verification steps, which causes rework during implementation. This skill routes each plan to the correct review lane and checklist, then returns graded blockers so a plan is only marked implementation-ready when it is truly executable.
使用我的智慧代理安裝
將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。
Review the Skillstore skill "plan-reviewer" from https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-plan-reviewer.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/zhaobolun-code-plan-reviewer/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。
Agent 可讀資源
當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。
測試它
正在使用「plan-reviewer」。 方案审核：review the checkout refactor plan.
預期結果:
- Lane: Full, because the change spans two modules.
- Blocker: step 3 has no acceptance A# mapping.
- Major: the API response has no frozen table.
- Gap: add a Delta spec for the retry behavior.
- Verdict: not implementation-ready.
正在使用「plan-reviewer」。 审方案：small single-file change.
預期結果:
Lane: Standard, L1. No blockers found. One major: the verification step is missing. Recommendation: send a confirmation package before coding starts.
正在使用「plan-reviewer」。 Can you review my plan?
預期結果:
Please tag the request with 方案审核 or 审方案 so the plan-reviewer lane activates. I will then return graded blockers and gaps for the execution document.
安全審計
安全Static analysis flagged 31 issues on a 79-line Chinese-language documentation skill: 7 backtick-execution hits, 23 path-traversal hits, and one high-entropy hit. Adjudication shows all 31 are false positives: the backticks are Markdown inline code spans, the '../' sequences are ordinary relative links to sibling documentation files, and the entropy comes from UTF-8 CJK text rather than a binary payload. No shell execution, filesystem traversal, credential access, or prompt injection is present; the skill is a read-only review router.
風險因素
分享與引用此報告
分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。
複製報告連結
https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-plan-reviewer/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-plan-reviewer?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-plan-reviewer?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/zhaobolun-code-plan-reviewer/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/zhaobolun-code-plan-reviewer.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
zhaobolun-code. (2026). plan-reviewer security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-plan-reviewer/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{zhaobolun-code-zhaobolun-code-plan-reviewer-2026,
author = {zhaobolun-code},
title = {plan-reviewer security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-plan-reviewer/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "plan-reviewer security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "zhaobolun-code"
date-released: "2026-09-17"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/zhaobolun-code-plan-reviewer/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:zhaobolun-code-plan-reviewer:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore 評分
評分依據 證據置信度: 中你可以打造什麼
Pre-implementation plan gate
Submit an execution document and receive graded blockers before any coding begins.
Acceptance and delta verification
Confirm that every step maps to acceptance criteria and a Delta spec before sign-off.
Cross-module change routing
Route multi-module plans to the correct review lane and isolation depth.
試試這些提示
方案审核：review this execution document and list every blocker and gap.
审方案：check whether every Step satisfies an acceptance A# and report missing Delta items.
方案审核：this change spans two business modules. Tell me which review lane it needs and whether isolated review is required.
方案审核：run the full checklist over the whole plan and return graded blockers, gaps, and suggestions, with a reason code for each item.
最佳實務
- Tag the request with 方案审核 or 审方案 so the correct review lane activates.
- Provide the execution document and the named dispatch file up front, because the reviewer reads only the whitelist it is given.
- Treat every blocker as a gate and resolve it before requesting implementation-ready status.
避免
- Asking for a review while expecting approval, then treating blockers as optional.
- Pasting the long rule text into findings instead of returning short graded results.
- Skipping the lane check and running a shallow review on a cross-module plan.
常見問題
What does this skill do?
Which phrases trigger it?
Does it edit my plan?
What are the review lanes?
What is a blocker?
Does it work on its own?
開發者詳細資訊
授權
MIT
Skillstore 修訂
r1
版本提示
作者未聲明版本。
引用
9be34bdd3e1cb2f1280ccd11fa00419204fc4d81
維護新鮮度
2026/9/18
使用量
0 次下載 · 0 次瀏覽
檔案結構