webask-source-dashboard
Compare WebAsk Survey Sources
Survey totals can hide differences between recruitment channels. This skill guides your assistant to compare tagged WebAsk responses by volume, completion rate, and your selected outcome.
使用我的智慧代理安裝
將此請求複製給你的智慧代理,其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。
Review the Skillstore skill "webask-source-dashboard" from https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-source-dashboard.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/webaskio-webask-source-dashboard/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫,並依安全政策請求必要確認。
Agent 可讀資源
當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時,請使用這些連結。
測試它
正在使用「webask-source-dashboard」。 Using the illustrative campaign data, compare sources by collected contacts.
預期結果:
- Illustrative results, sorted by collected contacts:
- Email: 168 responses, 119 completed, 71% completion, 62 contacts.
- Telegram: 94 responses, 60 completed, 64% completion, 38 contacts.
- Untagged: 82 responses, 48 completed, 59% completion, 27 contacts.
- Website banner: 68 responses, 15 completed, 22% completion, 9 contacts.
- Email leads in response volume, completion rate, and collected contacts.
- The banner has the lowest completion rate; investigate message alignment before drawing conclusions about the channel.
- One run does not justify stopping a channel.
正在使用「webask-source-dashboard」。 Compare channels for a survey with no source tags.
預期結果:
- No source tags were found, so a channel comparison is unavailable.
- Existing responses cannot be attributed retrospectively from arrival times.
- Add source tags to distribution links before the next survey run.
安全審計
安全All three static findings are false positives: relative documentation links and Markdown-formatted MCP tool names, not traversal operations or shell execution. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential theft, or unauthorized data transfer in the supplied files. The skill describes read-only survey reporting; external MCP implementation and authorization remain outside this review.
風險因素
📁 檔案系統存取 (1)
⚙️ 外部命令 (2)
分享與引用此報告
分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據,不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。
複製報告連結
https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-source-dashboard/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-source-dashboard?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-source-dashboard?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/webaskio-webask-source-dashboard/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/webaskio-webask-source-dashboard.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
webaskio. (2026). webask-source-dashboard security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-source-dashboard/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{webaskio-webaskio-webask-source-dashboard-2026,
author = {webaskio},
title = {webask-source-dashboard security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-source-dashboard/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "webask-source-dashboard security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "webaskio"
date-released: "2026-09-29"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-source-dashboard/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:webaskio-webask-source-dashboard:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore 評分
評分依據 證據置信度: 中你可以打造什麼
Compare campaign channels
Compare tagged email, messaging, and website responses by completion rate and collected contact count.
Assess survey recruitment
Review response volume and completion across recruitment sources while keeping small samples and untagged responses visible.
Review feedback by source
Compare average ratings across tagged invitation channels and identify differences that need further investigation.
試試這些提示
Check which source tags exist for WebAsk survey [survey]. Tell me whether a channel comparison is possible.
For WebAsk survey [survey], compare sources by response count and completion rate. Sort by completion rate and show untagged responses separately.
Compare sources for WebAsk survey [survey] using [outcome] as the primary metric. Include response counts, completion rates, and small-sample warnings.
Analyze WebAsk survey [survey] by source, prioritizing [outcome]. Contrast volume, completion, and outcome quality; separate untagged responses and explain uncertainty. Do not recommend stopping channels based on this run alone.
最佳實務
- Use consistent source tags on distribution links before collecting responses.
- Select the outcome metric before ranking channels, and review it alongside response counts and completion rates.
- Keep untagged responses visible and qualify comparisons involving small samples.
避免
- Guessing missing source attribution from response arrival times.
- Treating response volume alone as proof of channel quality.
- Stopping a channel based on one survey run or a small sample.
常見問題
Which assistants can use this skill?
What data does it need?
Can it identify sources when tags are missing?
Does it modify survey responses?
Does it create a dashboard application?
What happens when a WebAsk limit is reached?
開發者詳細資訊
作者
webaskio授權
MIT
Skillstore 修訂
r1
版本提示
作者未聲明版本。
引用
bad9dafc37d1638cd29cb9bab06d5f8dbcd0f6c2
維護新鮮度
2026/9/30
使用量
0 次下載 · 0 次瀏覽
檔案結構