webask-response-funnel
Analyze WebAsk Survey Drop-Off
Low survey completion can leave teams unsure which questions need attention. This skill uses WebAsk reports and questionnaire structure to identify potential drop-off points and recommend targeted changes.
使用我的智慧代理安裝
將此請求複製給你的智慧代理,其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。
Review the Skillstore skill "webask-response-funnel" from https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-response-funnel.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/webaskio-webask-response-funnel/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫,並依安全政策請求必要確認。
Agent 可讀資源
當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時,請使用這些連結。
測試它
正在使用「webask-response-funnel」。 Illustrative data: 200 attempts, 120 completions, 150 answers before a required phone question, and 125 answers at that question.
預期結果:
- Completion rate: 60%, based on 120 completed attempts out of 200.
- The phone question has 25 fewer answers than the preceding question, a decrease of approximately 16.7%.
- Required contact information is a possible source of friction, but these counts do not prove the cause.
- Consider making the phone question optional and explaining why the information is needed.
- No survey changes were made.
正在使用「webask-response-funnel」。 Illustrative data: 300 attempts and 180 completions; the workspace plan does not expose incomplete responses.
預期結果:
- Completion rate: 60%, based on 180 completed attempts out of 300.
- The current plan does not expose incomplete responses, so a question-level exit point cannot be measured.
- Questionnaire length, order, and required fields can still be reviewed.
- Any suggested causes from questionnaire structure remain hypotheses, not measured drop-off findings.
安全審計
安全All six static findings are false positives: one documentation breadcrumb and five Markdown-formatted MCP tool references. The workflow requests survey and plan information through read tools and explicitly prohibits autonomous survey edits. No evidence found of prompt injection, unauthorized data transfer, or shell execution in the reviewed files.
風險因素
📁 檔案系統存取 (1)
⚙️ 外部命令 (5)
分享與引用此報告
分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據,不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。
複製報告連結
https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-response-funnel/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-response-funnel?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-response-funnel?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/webaskio-webask-response-funnel/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/webaskio-webask-response-funnel.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
webaskio. (2026). webask-response-funnel security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-response-funnel/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{webaskio-webaskio-webask-response-funnel-2026,
author = {webaskio},
title = {webask-response-funnel security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-response-funnel/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "webask-response-funnel security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "webaskio"
date-released: "2026-09-29"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-response-funnel/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:webaskio-webask-response-funnel:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore 評分
評分依據 證據置信度: 中你可以打造什麼
Review customer feedback completion
Locate substantial response losses in a customer feedback survey and propose changes to demanding or sensitive questions.
Evaluate research questionnaire friction
Compare question-level response counts with questionnaire structure while separating measured results from possible explanations.
Assess contact collection timing
Review whether required contact questions coincide with response losses and suggest clearer explanations or later placement.
試試這些提示
Review WebAsk survey [survey identifier]. How many attempts were completed, and what is the completion rate?
Analyze WebAsk survey [survey identifier] for [date range]. Show response counts by question and identify substantial losses if incomplete responses are available.
Review the response funnel and question structure for [survey identifier]. Suggest specific changes to question order, required fields, or wording without editing the survey.
Analyze [survey identifier] for [production date range], excluding tests before [launch date]. Check plan access to incomplete responses and flag sample-size limits. Separate measured losses from hypotheses, note possible branching effects, and propose prioritized changes without editing anything.
最佳實務
- Provide the survey identifier and a production date range that excludes known test submissions.
- Check incomplete-response availability and sample size before interpreting question-level losses.
- Review proposed changes manually and distinguish observed response counts from explanations that require further evidence.
避免
- Treating question-type heuristics as proof of respondent motives.
- Combining test submissions with production responses or drawing firm conclusions from a very small sample.
- Using the skill to modify surveys automatically or initiate workspace plan upgrades.
常見問題
Which tools does this skill require?
Does the skill edit my survey?
What happens when incomplete responses are unavailable?
Can it prove why respondents leave?
How should I handle test submissions?
Which language does it use for findings?
開發者詳細資訊
作者
webaskio授權
MIT
Skillstore 修訂
r1
版本提示
作者未聲明版本。
引用
bad9dafc37d1638cd29cb9bab06d5f8dbcd0f6c2
維護新鮮度
2026/9/30
使用量
0 次下載 · 0 次瀏覽
檔案結構