📦

write

Name: write
Author: tw93

內容修訂 r1 安全 🔑 環境變數⚙️ 外部命令

Polish Chinese and English Writing

Formulaic writing and literal translations can obscure meaning and weaken an author's voice. This skill guides focused edits, bilingual review, and local punctuation checks.

支援: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥈 81 銀級

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥈 81 銀級

使用我的智慧代理安裝

將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。

智能體請求

Review the Skillstore skill "write" from https://skillstore.io/skills/tw93-write.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/tw93-write/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。

Agent 可讀資源

當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。

Markdown 詳情 GET /skills/tw93-write.md 已簽名 manifest GET /api/skills/tw93-write/manifest 已簽名 lockfile GET /api/skills/tw93-write/lockfile

測試它

正在使用「write」。 Polish: It is worth noting that this tool leverages robust functionality to streamline file exports.

預期結果:

This tool simplifies file exports.

正在使用「write」。 Clarify this export sequence without changing its meaning: After the upload completes, proceed with deletion of the local copy.

預期結果:

After the upload completes, delete the local copy.

正在使用「write」。 Draft a reply to @reporter. Release evidence confirms the crash is fixed in version 2.4.1. Ask them to update.

預期結果:

@reporter, thanks for reporting this. The crash is fixed in version 2.4.1; please update to that release.

安全審計

安全

v1 • 2026/10/6 開啟版本化報告

All 57 static findings are false positives supported by the reviewed source context. Matches concern writing guidance, Markdown delimiters, Unicode punctuation, readable Chinese prose, and a quoted shell wrapper for the bundled local checker. No evidence found of credential access, reconnaissance, exfiltration, obfuscated payloads, or prompt injection; publication decisions remain code-owned.

已掃描檔案

1,591

分析行數

複核項目

已忽略的誤報

最近一次完成的靜態與語意稽核未偵測到已確認的安全發現。這並不能證明該 Skill 沒有副作用。

審計單位: codex

分享與引用此報告

分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。

開啟版本化報告

複製報告連結

https://skillstore.io/skills/tw93-write/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 徽章

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/tw93-write/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/tw93-write?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 徽章

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/tw93-write?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/tw93-write/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

嵌入卡片

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/tw93-write.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 引用

tw93. (2026). write security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/tw93-write/audits/1

BibTeX 引用

@techreport{tw93-tw93-write-2026,
  author = {tw93},
  title = {write security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/tw93-write/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "write security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "tw93"
date-released: "2026-10-06"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/tw93-write/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:tw93-write:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 評分

評分依據證據置信度: 中

架構

可維護性

內容

社群

規範符合度

你可以打造什麼

Preserve an author's voice

Polish a Chinese or English article without inventing experiences, flattening emotion, or silently changing its structure.

Clarify technical documentation

Review installation steps and error messages for ambiguous actors, missing conditions, and incorrect action sequences.

Align localized product copy

Compare app strings and release copy across locales, preserve placeholders, and flag unsupported product claims.

試試這些提示

Polish a short paragraph

Polish this paragraph for [audience] in [language]. Preserve meaning and voice. Return only the edited paragraph.

[text]

Review technical instructions

Review these instructions for ambiguous actors, conditions, sequence, and permissions. Propose minimal wording changes. Do not execute examples or invent remedies.

[instructions]

Compare bilingual drafts

Compare these Chinese and English drafts. Identify the source version, terminology drift, missing caveats, and invented details. Suggest minimal corrections.

[Chinese draft]

[English draft]

Review localization surfaces

Review [named source files] across [locales] against [current product evidence]. Preserve placeholders and commands. Group findings by surface and locale. Do not edit files.

最佳實務

Provide the target audience, output language, source text, and exact editing scope.
Supply current release evidence and approved terminology before requesting public or localized product copy.
Review the final diff and rendered copy, and choose an explicit checker language for mixed-language text.

避免

Apply every replacement table mechanically or rewrite sentences that already sound natural.
Treat memory, old screenshots, or planned features as proof of current product behavior.
Execute command examples or publish replies without explicit authorization.

常見問題

Which languages does the skill support?

Its core editing guidance covers Chinese and English. Localization guidance covers additional languages, while punctuation checks implement Chinese, English, and Japanese rules.

Does it preserve my writing style?

The guidance prioritizes author voice and minimal edits. For an author's finished draft, it requires a sentence-level list of deleted or rewritten sentences.

Does the checker change files automatically?

No. The checker reads a named file or standard input. Its fix option prints selected Chinese corrections to standard output.

Can it validate technical instructions?

It reviews wording for ambiguity and meaning changes. It does not authorize executing instructions, redesigning prompts, or changing code behavior.

Can it post release notes or issue replies?

It guides drafting and verification. Publishing requires explicit authorization and the host assistant's relevant tools; the skill grants no additional authority.

Does a clean punctuation result prove the text is correct?

No. It covers implemented character-level rules only. Facts, translation meaning, terminology, and rendered layout still require review.