技能 same-idea-both-platforms

📦

same-idea-both-platforms

Name: same-idea-both-platforms
Author: prateeks367

內容修訂 r1 安全 ⚙️ 外部命令

Turn One Idea into Twitter and LinkedIn Posts

Identical posts often lack the structure each platform expects. This skill writes separate Twitter and LinkedIn drafts from one idea and explains their differences.

支援: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 77 銅級

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 銅級

使用我的智慧代理安裝

將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。

智能體請求

Review the Skillstore skill "same-idea-both-platforms" from https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。

Agent 可讀資源

當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。

Markdown 詳情 GET /skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms.md 已簽名 manifest GET /api/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/manifest 已簽名 lockfile GET /api/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/lockfile

測試它

正在使用「same-idea-both-platforms」。 Create Twitter and LinkedIn posts about testing a signup form before rebuilding the whole website.

預期結果:

Core idea: Test the signup form before committing to a full website rebuild.
Twitter: Before rebuilding your website, test the signup form. A smaller experiment can tell you where the real problem is.
LinkedIn: A website redesign is a large commitment. Testing the signup form first can reveal whether the problem needs a smaller change.
Difference: Twitter leads with the recommendation; LinkedIn introduces the decision and its context.

正在使用「same-idea-both-platforms」。 Write both posts about recording the reasons behind team decisions.

預期結果:

Core idea: Record why a team made a decision, not just what it decided.
Twitter: A decision log needs the reason, not just the result. Future teammates will need to understand what you were solving.
LinkedIn: When a team records a decision, the outcome is only part of the story. Include the constraints and alternatives behind it. That context helps future teammates understand the choice before revisiting it.
Difference: Twitter compresses the lesson; LinkedIn adds practical context and separates the supporting points.

安全審計

安全

v1 • 2026/10/2 開啟版本化報告

All three static detections are false positives caused by Markdown backticks around tool names, not Ruby or shell execution. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential theft, or data exfiltration in SKILL.md. The optional VoiceMOAT workflow describes separate previews and explicit approvals for each post.

已掃描檔案

分析行數

複核項目

已忽略的誤報

風險因素

⚙️ 外部命令 (3)

SKILL.md:58 SKILL.md:61 SKILL.md:63

最近一次完成的靜態與語意稽核未偵測到已確認的安全發現。這並不能證明該 Skill 沒有副作用。

審計單位: codex

分享與引用此報告

分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。

開啟版本化報告

複製報告連結

https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 徽章

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 徽章

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

嵌入卡片

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 引用

prateeks367. (2026). same-idea-both-platforms security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/audits/1

BibTeX 引用

@techreport{prateeks367-prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms-2026,
  author = {prateeks367},
  title = {same-idea-both-platforms security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "same-idea-both-platforms security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "prateeks367"
date-released: "2026-10-02"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 評分

評分依據證據置信度: 中

架構

可維護性

內容

社群

規範符合度

你可以打造什麼

Share a product lesson

Turn one product lesson into a concise Twitter statement and a contextual LinkedIn post.

Explain a technical insight

Present a technical insight differently for Twitter readers and LinkedIn professionals without changing the central claim.

Prepare paired client drafts

Create distinct drafts for both platforms and explain the structural choices during client review.

試試這些提示

Draft a simple post pair

Write separate Twitter and LinkedIn posts about [idea]. State the core idea first, then give both drafts and one sentence explaining their differences.

Extract an idea from existing text

Use [source text] to identify one core idea. Ask for clarification if needed, then write independent Twitter and LinkedIn drafts and explain the differences.

Review and rewrite a post pair

Review [Twitter draft] and [LinkedIn draft] for misplaced platform phrasing and repeated sentences. Rewrite both from their shared idea and explain the structural changes.

Use connected platform profiles

With VoiceMOAT connected, draft both posts about [idea] using each platform profile and score each draft. Preview separately; request approval before scheduling each.

最佳實務

Confirm the central idea in plain language before writing either post.
Write each draft independently and check for phrasing that belongs to the other platform.
Review both drafts for accuracy and approve each post separately when using connected publishing tools.

避免

Copying identical wording to both platforms and changing only the length.
Drafting from an unclear paragraph without identifying its main point.
Treating approval for one platform as permission to publish on both.

常見問題

What does this skill produce?

It produces a core idea, separate Twitter and LinkedIn drafts, and a short explanation of the differences.

Can I provide an existing post?

Yes. The skill extracts the underlying idea and writes both versions independently instead of copying the original wording.

Can I use it for only one platform?

That is outside its intended scope. The workflow is designed to produce both Twitter and LinkedIn posts.

Do I need VoiceMOAT to draft posts?

No. The core drafting workflow works without VoiceMOAT; platform profiles, scoring, publishing, and scheduling depend on the connector.

What does the VoiceMOAT connector require?

The skill states that the connector requires a VoiceMOAT Pro or Enterprise plan.

Will both posts publish automatically?

No. The connected workflow specifies a separate preview and one-time confirmation for each post.

開發者詳細資訊

作者

prateeks367

授權

MIT

Skillstore 修訂

版本提示

作者未聲明版本。

儲存庫

https://github.com/prateeks367/voicemoat-skills/tree/b1749d2bf583cf8c78baf246f6007522e8c052a2/skills/same-idea-both-platforms

引用

5726d703fd79596f46a4232d911221f962d9af1d

維護新鮮度

2026/10/2

使用量

0 次下載 · 0 次瀏覽

檔案結構

📄 SKILL.md