技能 interface-review
📦

interface-review

內容修訂 r1 安全 ⚙️ 外部命令📁 檔案系統存取

Review Interface Changes with Clear Evidence

Interface changes can introduce visual, accessibility, and content regressions across connected surfaces. This skill resolves the change scope and produces evidence-based findings with clear status labels.

支援: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 銅級

使用我的智慧代理安裝

將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。

智能體請求
Review the Skillstore skill "interface-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。

Agent 可讀資源

當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。

Markdown 詳情 GET /skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review.md 已簽名 manifest GET /api/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/manifest 已簽名 lockfile GET /api/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/lockfile

測試它

正在使用「interface-review」。 Review the current branch and include uncommitted interface changes.

預期結果:

  • Scope: seven commits and two uncommitted files against the default branch.
  • Coverage: twelve files after exclusions, with two affected surfaces reviewed.
  • Finding: a dialog lost its accessible name in this change. Status: Regression. Severity: High.
  • Verdict: Block until the accessible name is restored.

正在使用「interface-review」。 Review pull request 482 for interface issues.

預期結果:

  • Scope: the fetched pull request head compared with its merge base.
  • Coverage: no interface evidence was found in excluded generated files.
  • No actionable interface findings were introduced or regressed.
  • Verdict: Approve.

安全審計

安全
v1 • 2026/9/4 開啟版本化報告

All 44 static findings are false positives. The external-command alerts mistake Markdown formatting and examples for Ruby execution; the other alerts describe bounded review scope or isolated worktree use. No evidence of prompt injection, exfiltration intent, destructive behavior, or other semantic security issues was found.

4
已掃描檔案
289
分析行數
0
複核項目
0
已忽略的誤報

風險因素

⚙️ 外部命令 (40)
SKILL.md:11 SKILL.md:25 SKILL.md:29 SKILL.md:39 SKILL.md:43 SKILL.md:44 SKILL.md:45 SKILL.md:49 SKILL.md:61 SKILL.md:63 SKILL.md:69 SKILL.md:70 SKILL.md:71 SKILL.md:73 SKILL.md:75-77 SKILL.md:77-79 SKILL.md:79-94 SKILL.md:94-96 SKILL.md:96-98 SKILL.md:98-102 SKILL.md:102 SKILL.md:104-110 SKILL.md:110-113 SKILL.md:113 SKILL.md:115-116 SKILL.md:116 SKILL.md:119-128 SKILL.md:128 SKILL.md:129 SKILL.md:130 SKILL.md:133 SKILL.md:134 SKILL.md:136-138 SKILL.md:138-142 SKILL.md:142 SKILL.md:144 SKILL.md:146-150 SKILL.md:150-152 SKILL.md:152 SKILL.md:154
📁 檔案系統存取 (1)
SKILL.md:104
最近一次完成的靜態與語意稽核未偵測到已確認的安全發現。這並不能證明該 Skill 沒有副作用。
審計單位: codex
分享與引用此報告

分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。

開啟版本化報告
安全評估

複製報告連結

https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 徽章

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 徽章

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

嵌入卡片

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 引用

jakubkrehel. (2026). interface-review security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/audits/1

BibTeX 引用

@techreport{jakubkrehel-jakubkrehel-interface-review-2026, author = {jakubkrehel}, title = {interface-review security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "interface-review security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "jakubkrehel" date-released: "2026-09-04" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/jakubkrehel-interface-review/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:jakubkrehel-interface-review:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 評分

評分依據 證據置信度: 中
55
架構
85
可維護性
87
內容
65
社群
83
規範符合度

你可以打造什麼

Review a feature branch

Check interface changes across the branch and local edits before opening a pull request.

Assess a pull request

Resolve the pull request ref, inspect affected surfaces, and identify interface regressions.

Verify accessibility changes

Inspect removed semantics, focus behavior, labels, and motion preferences within the selected change.

試試這些提示

Review my current changes 
Review the current interface changes. Resolve the default scope and report only introduced or regressed interface issues.
Review a pull request 
Review pull request 482 for interface regressions. Include the resolved scope, affected surfaces, exclusions, coverage, and status for each finding.
Review an explicit range 
Review release..feature as written. Check removed lines, expand affected consumers, and separate introduced, regressed, and pre-existing findings.
Audit a shared design token change 
Review this design token change across two consumer hops. Prioritize rendered entry points, explain coverage limits, and verify each claimed regression against the base.

最佳實務

  • Name the target explicitly when you need a pull request, ref, branch, or range reviewed.
  • Provide the change intent so missing states and incomplete behavior can be evaluated.
  • Request rendered verification when findings depend on runtime behavior or visual output.

避免

  • Do not use this skill as a whole-repository audit without routing directly to better-interface.
  • Do not treat pre-existing issues as failures caused by the current change.
  • Do not assume runtime or visual behavior was verified when the report marks it unverified.

常見問題

What change targets are supported?
The skill supports working, staged, branch, pull request, bare ref, and explicit two-dot or three-dot ranges.
Does it modify my working tree?
No. Reviews are read-only, and pull request refs are fetched without checkout.
How are affected surfaces selected?
The skill expands direct consumers by default and may expand two hops for shared primitives, themes, and design tokens.
Does it review every consumer?
No. It reviews at most five consumers and reports how many were not expanded.
Can it perform visual verification?
Yes, when requested or when the project provides a cheap preview. Otherwise, visual and runtime claims remain unverified.
Does it review security and performance?
No. It names those concerns once and directs them to the project general code review.

開發者詳細資訊

授權

MIT

Skillstore 修訂

r1

版本提示

作者未聲明版本。

儲存庫

https://github.com/jakubkrehel/skills/tree/267330e1adfc66a718fb65fa6918c1f06d0a689e/skills/interface-review

引用

096c7daa4d0d974771dad12d81c3d0d4688617b9

維護新鮮度

2026/9/8

使用量

1 次下載 · 0 次瀏覽

檔案結構

📁 agents/

📄 openai.yaml

📄 removed-signals.md

📄 scope-resolution.md

📄 SKILL.md

jakubkrehel 的更多技能

查看全部

相關技能

查看全部