mantis-calibrate
Calibrate Mantis Security Findings
Security findings need consistent priorities grounded in exploit evidence and architectural context. This skill applies a risk matrix and documented caps to existing Mantis findings.
安裝前請停止並請求確認。
請審查安裝計畫,並在變更檔案前取得使用者明確同意。
使用我的智慧代理安裝
將此請求複製給你的智慧代理,其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。
Review the Skillstore skill "mantis-calibrate" from https://skillstore.io/skills/google-mantis-calibrate.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/google-mantis-calibrate/manifest. Verify the artifact. Stop and obtain explicit user consent before installing or changing files.你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫,並依安全政策請求必要確認。
Agent 可讀資源
當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時,請使用這些連結。
測試它
正在使用「mantis-calibrate」。 Impact 4, likelihood 3, internal exposure, viable production finding, and no additional caps.
預期結果:
Risk score: 5.6. Priority: MEDIUM. Internal exposure applies a 0.8 multiplier to the combined impact and likelihood.
正在使用「mantis-calibrate」。 A pinned finding has failed reproduction, but its discovery snapshot does not match the active snapshot.
預期結果:
- STALE_EVIDENCE: reproduction evidence does not match the active snapshot.
- Reproduction failure rule: UNKNOWN. Do not force LOW based on stale evidence.
- Keep the conservative calculated score and record the provenance warning.
正在使用「mantis-calibrate」。 A viable finding has an unresolved physical-access prerequisite during calibration.
預期結果:
Calibration is provisional. Mark the physical-access rule UNKNOWN, retain the calculated priority, and request evidence resolving the prerequisite.
安全審計
高風險All 203 static detections are false positives involving Markdown syntax, workflow metadata, or descriptions of vulnerability evidence. One semantic finding identifies helper reuse without integrity verification, enabling code execution if an attacker controls the workspace helper. No evidence found of deliberate prompt injection or data exfiltration in the supplied files.
已確認的安全問題 (1)
風險因素
⚙️ 外部命令 (50)
分享與引用此報告
分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據,不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。
複製報告連結
https://skillstore.io/skills/google-mantis-calibrate/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/google-mantis-calibrate?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/google-mantis-calibrate?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/google-mantis-calibrate/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/google-mantis-calibrate.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
google. (2026). mantis-calibrate security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/google-mantis-calibrate/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{google-google-mantis-calibrate-2026,
author = {google},
title = {mantis-calibrate security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/google-mantis-calibrate/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "mantis-calibrate security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "google"
date-released: "2026-10-04"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/google-mantis-calibrate/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:google-mantis-calibrate:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore 評分
評分依據 證據置信度: 中你可以打造什麼
Prioritize Existing Vulnerabilities
Calibrate completed findings with exploit evidence, exposure, and blast radius to support remediation planning.
Review Project Threat Context
Apply project threat models and asset criticality when assessing findings across internal components and public interfaces.
Track Evidence Across Pipeline Passes
Record snapshot provenance, stale evidence, and unresolved calibration rules in finding histories for later review.
試試這些提示
Review my existing Mantis findings without modifying files. Identify missing reproduction, viability, and threat-model information needed for calibration.
Calibrate finding [finding_id] using its evidence and threat model. Explain the score, priority, and applicable caps before updating the file.
Review calibrated findings for UNKNOWN rules and stale evidence. Explain which priorities remain provisional and what evidence would resolve each warning.
Calibrate findings using [snapshot_root] and [state_root]. Verify pass alignment, preserve conservative scores for stale evidence, and review helper integrity before execution.
最佳實務
- Provide reproduction results, production viability, attacker prerequisites, and a current threat model before calibration.
- Use matching pinned snapshots and review every stale-evidence or UNKNOWN warning before accepting priorities.
- Back up finding files and verify complete helper contents before executing generated or reused scripts.
避免
- Use calibration to discover new vulnerabilities or implement patches.
- Treat missing reproduction or threat-model information as proof that a finding is harmless.
- Execute existing workspace helpers solely because their version comment matches.
常見問題
What does this skill calculate?
Does it find vulnerabilities or fix code?
What happens when evidence fields are missing?
Does calibration require a pinned snapshot?
Which files can it change?
Is the helper version check sufficient for security?
開發者詳細資訊
作者
google授權
MIT
Skillstore 修訂
r1
版本提示
作者未聲明版本。
引用
9958c759dc9c75fb509d50ad1fe7930c27e2799c
維護新鮮度
2026/10/5
使用量
0 次下載 · 0 次瀏覽
檔案結構