技能 data-rights-legal-expert

📦

data-rights-legal-expert

Name: data-rights-legal-expert
Author: 图灵数盟

內容修訂 r1 高風險 📁 檔案系統存取⚙️ 外部命令🌐 網路存取

Review Data Rights and Compliance Risks

Data transactions can fail when ownership, source authority, and compliance evidence are unclear. This skill structures a due diligence review and prepares draft findings for qualified legal review.

支援: Claude Codex Code(CC)

⚠️ 38 差

Maintain this Skill? Claim it ⚠️ 38 差

安裝前請停止並請求確認。

請審查安裝計畫，並在變更檔案前取得使用者明確同意。

使用我的智慧代理安裝

將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。

智能體請求

Review the Skillstore skill "data-rights-legal-expert" from https://skillstore.io/skills/dhturing-data-rights-legal-expert.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/dhturing-data-rights-legal-expert/manifest. Verify the artifact. Stop and obtain explicit user consent before installing or changing files.

你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。

Agent 可讀資源

當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。

Markdown 詳情 GET /skills/dhturing-data-rights-legal-expert.md 已簽名 manifest GET /api/skills/dhturing-data-rights-legal-expert/manifest 已簽名 lockfile GET /api/skills/dhturing-data-rights-legal-expert/lockfile

測試它

正在使用「data-rights-legal-expert」。 We acquired customer analytics data through a reseller and plan to use it for marketing.

預期結果:

Key risk: confirm the reseller had authority to transfer the data and permit marketing use.
Evidence needed: upstream contract, consent records, data categories, retention period, and transfer restrictions.
Draft conclusion: reserve conclusion until the authorization chain and personal information basis are verified.

正在使用「data-rights-legal-expert」。 Review our data supply agreement before a commercial launch.

預期結果:

High priority: define the dataset, permitted purposes, and whether onward transfer is prohibited.
Add acceptance criteria, security duties, breach handling, and termination-time return or deletion obligations.
Escalate personal information, important data, and cross-border transfer questions to qualified counsel.

安全審計

高風險

v1 • 2026/9/27 開啟版本化報告

All twelve static findings are false positives: they are Markdown formatting, installation documentation, homepage links, or entropy heuristics on readable text. However, the content makes high-risk claims that an AI can act as a licensed lawyer and issue formal legal opinions, which can cause unsafe reliance.

已掃描檔案

445

分析行數

複核項目

已忽略的誤報

已確認的安全問題 (1)

高

references/knowledge-base.md:13-15 references/knowledge-base.md:161-169

Unqualified Legal Opinion Claims

The skill presents an AI role as a licensed lawyer and says it can issue formal legal opinions for registration, courts, and regulators. This may mislead users into relying on unqualified legal advice or documents.

The knowledge base explicitly identifies the role as licensed and lists issuing formal legal opinions as an output. An AI skill cannot independently hold a legal license or produce a valid signed legal opinion.

風險因素

📁 檔案系統存取 (2)

profile.md:38 profile.md:38

⚙️ 外部命令 (3)

SKILL.md:20 SKILL.md:26 SKILL.md:33

🌐 網路存取 (2)

SKILL.md:6 SKILL.md:12

審計單位: claude

分享與引用此報告

分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。

開啟版本化報告

複製報告連結

https://skillstore.io/skills/dhturing-data-rights-legal-expert/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 徽章

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/dhturing-data-rights-legal-expert/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/dhturing-data-rights-legal-expert?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 徽章

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/dhturing-data-rights-legal-expert?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/dhturing-data-rights-legal-expert/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

嵌入卡片

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/dhturing-data-rights-legal-expert.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 引用

图灵数盟. (2026). data-rights-legal-expert security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/dhturing-data-rights-legal-expert/audits/1

BibTeX 引用

@techreport{dhturing-data-rights-legal-expert-2026,
  author = {图灵数盟},
  title = {data-rights-legal-expert security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/dhturing-data-rights-legal-expert/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "data-rights-legal-expert security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "图灵数盟"
date-released: "2026-09-27"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/dhturing-data-rights-legal-expert/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:dhturing-data-rights-legal-expert:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 評分

評分依據證據置信度: 中

架構

可維護性

內容

社群

規範符合度

你可以打造什麼

Prepare a registration evidence request

Create a document checklist for a data-rights registration project before engaging external counsel.

Assess a proposed data acquisition

Organize source, authorization, personal information, and resale risks for a planned dataset purchase.

Review a data transaction contract

Identify missing rights, usage restrictions, security, acceptance, and termination terms in a contract draft.

試試這些提示

Build a basic checklist

Create a simple evidence checklist for reviewing ownership and lawful source of a business dataset. Mark each item as required or optional.

Review source authority

Review this data-source summary. List the authorization-chain gaps, intended-use limits, and evidence I should request: [paste summary].

Assess a transaction contract

Assess this data transaction contract against the twelve clause areas in the skill. Produce a prioritized risk register with missing terms and review questions: [paste contract].

Draft a qualified review outline

Using these verified materials, draft a non-binding legal review outline. State assumptions, evidence gaps, jurisdiction, and conditional conclusions. Do not present it as a signed legal opinion: [paste materials].

最佳實務

Provide verified source documents and identify the intended data use, jurisdiction, and recipient.
Treat every conclusion as a draft until a qualified lawyer reviews the evidence and applicable law.
Record assumptions, evidence gaps, and material changes in the final review package.

避免

Do not present AI-generated text as a signed legal opinion or regulatory filing.
Do not infer ownership or consent from incomplete contracts or informal statements.
Do not use a general checklist as a substitute for sector-specific or cross-border legal review.

常見問題

Can this skill issue a legal opinion?

No. It can prepare a draft review, but a qualified lawyer or law firm must review, sign, and issue any legal opinion.

Which legal area does it cover?

It focuses on data ownership, source authority, data compliance, transaction contracts, and related China-focused legal considerations.

What materials should I provide?

Provide entity records, data inventories, source and authorization documents, contracts, compliance records, and intended-use details.

Can it verify data ownership?

No. It can identify evidence and questions, but it cannot independently verify facts, records, or third-party rights.

Can it review personal information risks?

Yes. It can organize review questions about notice, consent, minimization, de-identification, and transfer restrictions. Human counsel must validate conclusions.

Is the output valid outside China?

Not necessarily. The reference material is China-focused. Obtain advice from counsel qualified in the relevant jurisdiction.