技能 competitors
📦

competitors

v2.0.1 內容修訂 r1 安全 ⚙️ 外部命令

Create Credible Competitor Comparison Pages

Competitor pages often lack useful detail, balanced claims, and consistent structure. This skill turns verified product data into persuasive comparison content for buyers and search engines.

支援: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 銅級

使用我的智慧代理安裝

將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。

智能體請求
Review the Skillstore skill "competitors" from https://skillstore.io/skills/coreyhaines31-competitors.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/coreyhaines31-competitors/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。

Agent 可讀資源

當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。

Markdown 詳情 GET /skills/coreyhaines31-competitors.md 已簽名 manifest GET /api/skills/coreyhaines31-competitors/manifest 已簽名 lockfile GET /api/skills/coreyhaines31-competitors/lockfile

測試它

正在使用「competitors」。 Create an outline for Acme versus BetaDesk for small support teams.

預期結果:

A page outline with a brief verdict, feature and pricing comparisons, team-fit guidance, migration details, evidence notes, and a focused call to action.

正在使用「competitors」。 Plan a roundup targeting BetaDesk alternatives.

預期結果:

  • Search intent and evaluation criteria for buyers leaving BetaDesk.
  • A balanced shortlist with Acme presented first and every option matched to a use case.
  • Recommended URL, title, comparison table, internal links, and research gaps.

正在使用「competitors」。 Design a comparison hub for five project management competitors.

預期結果:

A prioritized page map, shared competitor profile fields, index structure, cross-linking plan, and quarterly fact-check schedule.

安全審計

安全
v1 • 2026/9/18 開啟版本化報告

All five static findings are false positives caused by Markdown inline code around file paths and URL examples. The skill contains no shell execution in those locations and no semantic security issue was found.

4
已掃描檔案
849
分析行數
0
複核項目
0
已忽略的誤報

風險因素

⚙️ 外部命令 (5)
SKILL.md:15 SKILL.md:73 SKILL.md:92 SKILL.md:115 SKILL.md:135
最近一次完成的靜態與語意稽核未偵測到已確認的安全發現。這並不能證明該 Skill 沒有副作用。
審計單位: codex
分享與引用此報告

分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。

開啟版本化報告
安全評估

複製報告連結

https://skillstore.io/skills/coreyhaines31-competitors/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 徽章

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/coreyhaines31-competitors/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/coreyhaines31-competitors?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 徽章

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/coreyhaines31-competitors?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/coreyhaines31-competitors/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

嵌入卡片

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/coreyhaines31-competitors.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 引用

coreyhaines31. (2026). competitors security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 2.0.1]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/coreyhaines31-competitors/audits/1

BibTeX 引用

@techreport{coreyhaines31-coreyhaines31-competitors-2026, author = {coreyhaines31}, title = {competitors security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/coreyhaines31-competitors/audits/1}, note = {Author version 2.0.1} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "competitors security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "2.0.1" type: report authors: - name: "coreyhaines31" date-released: "2026-09-18" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/coreyhaines31-competitors/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:coreyhaines31-competitors:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 評分

評分依據 證據置信度: 中
41
架構
100
可維護性
87
內容
65
社群
91
規範符合度

你可以打造什麼

Launch an Alternative Page

Create a focused page for buyers considering a switch from one named competitor.

Build a Comparison Content Hub

Plan reusable competitor data, page formats, URLs, priorities, and internal links across a comparison library.

Publish an Independent Comparison

Compare two products objectively with clear criteria, audience recommendations, pricing context, and balanced conclusions.

試試這些提示

Outline a Direct Comparison 
Outline a comparison page for [Our Product] versus [Competitor]. Our audience is [Audience], and our verified differentiators are [Differentiators].
Draft an Alternative Page 
Draft a [Competitor] alternative page for [Our Product]. Use only these verified facts: [Facts]. Include pricing, audience fit, migration, and balanced tradeoffs.
Plan an Alternatives Roundup 
Plan a roundup for the keyword [Competitor] alternatives. Compare [Products] using [Criteria], recommend options by use case, and propose internal links.
Design a Comparison Hub 
Design a comparison hub for [Our Product] and [Competitors]. Define centralized research fields, page priorities, URL patterns, cross-links, update owners, and review cadence.

最佳實務

  • Verify every pricing, feature, and customer claim before publication.
  • Explain which product fits each audience instead of declaring one universal winner.
  • Store competitor facts centrally and assign a regular update schedule.

避免

  • Do not invent competitor weaknesses, reviews, prices, or customer quotes.
  • Do not publish comparison tables without explaining why each difference matters.
  • Do not present your product as the best option for every buyer.

常見問題

Which comparison formats does this skill support?
It supports singular alternatives, alternatives roundups, your product versus a competitor, and competitor versus competitor pages.
Does the skill research current competitor information?
It provides a research process, but current prices, features, reviews, and search data must be supplied or independently verified.
Can it create a complete page draft?
Yes. It can produce metadata, section copy, tables, audience guidance, migration content, and calls to action from verified inputs.
How does it keep comparisons credible?
It requires balanced strengths, limitations, use cases, and evidence instead of unsupported claims or feature checklists.
Can it plan many comparison pages?
Yes. It can define reusable competitor profiles, page priorities, URL structures, index pages, internal links, and update schedules.
Is it suitable for internal sales battle cards?
No. The skill directs internal battle cards and objection handling materials to a dedicated sales enablement workflow.

開發者詳細資訊

授權

MIT

作者版本

v2.0.1

Skillstore 修訂

r1

儲存庫

https://github.com/coreyhaines31/marketingskills/tree/5b2c0007766c6a1cf1d53fd8fc73e979e0821022/skills/competitors

引用

be359e814a4cf1042d4962f60659736b4de98135

維護新鮮度

2026/9/18

使用量

0 次下載 · 0 次瀏覽

檔案結構

📁 evals/

📄 evals.json

📁 references/

📄 content-architecture.md

📄 templates.md

📄 SKILL.md

coreyhaines31 的更多技能

查看全部

相關技能

查看全部