技能 pricing-contrast-set
📦
pricing-contrast-set
內容修訂 r1 中風險 ⚙️ 外部命令📁 檔案系統存取
Design Three-Tier Pricing Comparisons
Unclear pricing tiers make product comparisons difficult and obscure the preferred offer. This skill structures three tiers with comparable quantities, distinct features, and testable adoption estimates.
支援: Claude Codex Code(CC)
使用我的智慧代理安裝
將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。
智能體請求
Review the Skillstore skill "pricing-contrast-set" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-contrast-set.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-contrast-set/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。
Agent 可讀資源
當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。
測試它
正在使用「pricing-contrast-set」。 Propose seat-based plans for a collaboration tool with a $300 monthly target plan and a real larger-team buyer.
預期結果:
- Starter: $90 monthly for 5 seats, with core collaboration.
- Team: $300 monthly for 25 seats, with core collaboration and audit logs.
- Scale: $900 monthly for 100 seats, with all Team features, SSO, and priority support.
- Per-seat costs decrease from $18 to $12 to $9. Validate prices and adoption assumptions before launch.
正在使用「pricing-contrast-set」。 Our last 90 days show 30% Starter, 45% Team, and 25% Scale adoption. What should we review?
預期結果:
- Starter adoption exceeds the framework's 20% diagnostic threshold.
- Team adoption falls below its 50% target-tier diagnostic threshold.
- Review Team pricing, feature clarity, and whether Starter serves a legitimate customer segment.
- Treat these thresholds as hypotheses. Test changes before replacing the existing plans.
安全審計
中風險v1 • 2026/10/3 開啟版本化報告
All 21 static findings are false positives: Markdown formatting and fixed documentation references, not shell execution or exploitative path traversal. One semantic finding identifies unsupported popularity claims in generated pricing copy. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential access, data exfiltration, or destructive operations in the reviewed file.
1
已掃描檔案
219
分析行數
0
複核項目
0
已忽略的誤報
已確認的安全問題 (1)
中
Unsupported Popularity Claim in Pricing Copy
The skill requests ready-to-ship copy with the target tier labeled "Most Popular" and repeats that label in its output template. It uses predicted adoption without requiring observed sales, creating a risk of misleading buyers through unsupported social proof.
The workflow and output template explicitly prescribe a popularity label without a supporting-data condition. Some operators may have supporting data, but the instructions do not require it.
風險因素
⚙️ 外部命令 (17)
📁 檔案系統存取 (4)
審計單位: codex
分享與引用此報告
分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。
複製報告連結
https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-contrast-set/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-contrast-set?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-contrast-set?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-contrast-set/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-contrast-set.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
cmj-hub. (2026). pricing-contrast-set security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-contrast-set/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-pricing-contrast-set-2026,
author = {cmj-hub},
title = {pricing-contrast-set security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-contrast-set/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "pricing-contrast-set security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "cmj-hub"
date-released: "2026-10-03"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-contrast-set/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-pricing-contrast-set:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore 評分
評分依據 證據置信度: 中 55
架構
85
可維護性
87
內容
65
社群
91
規範符合度
你可以打造什麼
Create Initial SaaS Tiers
Define three plans with comparable seat quantities, feature differences, prices, and intended buyers before testing demand.
Diagnose an Existing Pricing Structure
Use recent tier adoption data to identify unclear differentiation and propose a revised comparison.
Draft Pricing-Page Cards
Turn approved tiers into concise comparison copy and prepare recommendations for a pricing experiment.
試試這些提示
Outline Three Tiers
Design three pricing tiers for [product] using [value metric]. Include quantities, prices, features, and intended buyers. State assumptions and missing inputs.
Review Current Tier Adoption
Review [current tiers] and [90-day adoption shares]. Diagnose tier differentiation using this framework. Separate observed data from assumptions and recommend changes.
Draft a Pricing Comparison
Draft pricing cards for [approved tiers]. Keep one shared value metric and concise feature lists. Use popularity claims only when [sales evidence] supports them.
Develop a Testable Redesign
Redesign [tier structure] using [buyer profiles], [target contract value], and [adoption history]. Explain tradeoffs, label forecasts, and prepare a companion-skill test-design handoff.
最佳實務
- Supply current tiers, a shared value metric, buyer profiles, and recent adoption data.
- Keep every tier credible and use verified evidence for popularity labels.
- Label adoption forecasts as hypotheses and validate the redesign through controlled testing.
避免
- Comparing tiers with incompatible value metrics or unclear feature differences.
- Creating a fictional premium tier only to make another plan appear inexpensive.
- Publishing predicted adoption as measured demand or guaranteeing the framework's performance claims.
常見問題
What does this skill produce?
It produces tier definitions, prices, quantities, feature differences, buyer profiles, adoption estimates, and pricing-card copy.
What inputs should I provide?
Provide current tiers, the shared value metric, buyer profiles, and recent adoption shares. The workflow expects these inputs from business configuration.
Does it guarantee that most buyers choose the target tier?
No. Its target adoption range is a framework assumption. Actual demand requires measurement and testing.
Are the companion skills included?
No. The reviewed package contains only SKILL.md. Anchor-copy references and experiment-design skills must be available separately.
Can it publish a page or run an A/B test?
No. It drafts pricing copy and recommends a handoff for test design. It does not provide deployment or experiment execution tools.
When can I label a tier Most Popular?
Use that label only when verified purchase data supports it. For untested tiers, use a recommendation label without claiming observed popularity.