pricing-audit
Audit Your B2B Pricing Program
Pricing reviews often produce opinions without a consistent score or action order. This skill evaluates 30 checks and turns gaps into three prioritized levers and a 90-day remediation plan.
使用我的智慧代理安裝
將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。
Review the Skillstore skill "pricing-audit" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-audit.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-audit/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。
Agent 可讀資源
當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。
測試它
正在使用「pricing-audit」。 A B2B company has recent willingness-to-pay research, unclear tier outcomes, and no documented discount approvals.
預期結果:
Overall score: 64/100. Top levers: define tier outcomes, document discount thresholds, and connect renewal increases to a standard cadence.
正在使用「pricing-audit」。 A pricing page shows four tiers, mixed per-seat and usage metrics, and no visible prices below the enterprise level.
預期結果:
Tier architecture: fail. The review flags inconsistent value measurement, excessive tier count, and missing price transparency as the first remediation priorities.
正在使用「pricing-audit」。 A team provides a full audit with failed checks and asks what to do first.
預期結果:
90-day order: validate willingness to pay, simplify the tier structure, then test outcome-focused copy. Each lever includes an owner and measurable success criterion.
安全審計
安全All 16 static findings are false positives. The cited lines contain prose, Markdown formatting, tool names, and relative documentation references; no executable shell command or filesystem traversal operation is shown. No semantic security finding was identified.
風險因素
分享與引用此報告
分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。
複製報告連結
https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-audit/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-audit?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-audit?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-audit/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-audit.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
cmj-hub. (2026). pricing-audit security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-audit/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-pricing-audit-2026,
author = {cmj-hub},
title = {pricing-audit security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-audit/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "pricing-audit security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "cmj-hub"
date-released: "2026-10-03"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-audit/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-pricing-audit:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore 評分
評分依據 證據置信度: 中你可以打造什麼
Prepare a pricing review
Give a pricing leader a consistent baseline before a product, sales, and finance review.
Prioritize commercial work
Help a revenue operations team rank pricing gaps by impact, reversibility, and available evidence.
Challenge a pricing proposal
Give a founder or product executive a structured way to test tiers, anchors, value metrics, and discount practices.
試試這些提示
Audit this B2B pricing program across all 30 checks. Use only the information provided, mark unknowns clearly, and give the overall score.
Evaluate the diagnostic data dimension using the supplied pricing evidence. List each check as pass, partial, fail, or not applicable, with a short reason.
Assess these pricing tiers against the tier architecture checks. Identify issues with the value metric, decoy, anchor, feature differences, and customer distribution.
Use the completed audit to select the three strongest pricing levers. Sequence the work over 90 days and define an owner, action, timeline, and success metric for each.
最佳實務
- Provide current pricing data, customer segments, and test results before requesting a score.
- Separate confirmed evidence from assumptions and mark unknown checks as not applicable only with a reason.
- Sequence recommendations so foundational research precedes tier or copy changes.
避免
- Do not treat the score as a forecast of revenue or margin.
- Do not change tiers before checking the underlying value metric and customer evidence.
- Do not present unsupported assumptions as completed pricing research.