技能 cold-email-audit
📦
cold-email-audit
內容修訂 r1 安全 ⚙️ 外部命令🌐 網路存取📁 檔案系統存取
Audit Your B2B Cold Email Program
Weak outbound results can originate from infrastructure, targeting, messaging, or operations. This workflow organizes evidence and, with its referenced rubric, ranks improvements in a 90-day plan.
支援: Claude Codex Code(CC)
使用我的智慧代理安裝
將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。
智能體請求
Review the Skillstore skill "cold-email-audit" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。
Agent 可讀資源
當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。
測試它
正在使用「cold-email-audit」。 We have not documented our sending setup, and our reply process is unclear. Start an outbound audit.
預期結果:
- Infrastructure: share sending domains, provider, warm-up history, daily limits, and SPF, DKIM, and DMARC status.
- Targeting: share your ideal customer definition, pain signals, list source, list size, send volume, and baseline response rate.
- Messaging: share your opener, subject lines, sequence cadence, and personalization approach.
- Operations: identify reply ownership, response targets, booking process, sales handoff, and reporting cadence.
- Scoring remains pending until your answers and the required rubric are available.
正在使用「cold-email-audit」。 Our completed rubric gives infrastructure 4/8, targeting 6/8, messaging 5/8, and operations 3/6. Authentication, segmentation, and reply ownership need work.
預期結果:
- Overall score: 60/100, grade C, from 18 earned points out of 30.
- Top priorities: resolve authentication gaps, improve segmentation, and assign reply ownership.
- Days 1-14: infrastructure owner resolves authentication gaps; verify the configured records.
- Days 15-45: campaign owner improves segmentation; compare response rates against the baseline.
- Days 46-90: sales operations owner establishes reply ownership; track response time against the agreed target.
安全審計
安全v1 • 2026/10/3 開啟版本化報告
All 13 static findings are false positives involving Markdown formatting, reference navigation, a resource link, and ordinary audit prose. No evidence found of command execution, unauthorized data transfer, system reconnaissance, or prompt injection in the reviewed file. The required scoring rubric is not included in the reviewed package, limiting reproducible scoring.
1
已掃描檔案
152
分析行數
0
複核項目
0
已忽略的誤報
風險因素
⚙️ 外部命令 (9)
🌐 網路存取 (1)
📁 檔案系統存取 (1)
最近一次完成的靜態與語意稽核未偵測到已確認的安全發現。這並不能證明該 Skill 沒有副作用。
審計單位: codex
分享與引用此報告
分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。
複製報告連結
https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
cmj-hub. (2026). cold-email-audit security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-cold-email-audit-2026,
author = {cmj-hub},
title = {cold-email-audit security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "cold-email-audit security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "cmj-hub"
date-released: "2026-10-03"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-audit/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-cold-email-audit:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore 評分
評分依據 證據置信度: 中 55
架構
85
可維護性
87
內容
65
社群
83
規範符合度
你可以打造什麼
Prioritize outbound improvements
Review a startup outbound program and identify three practical priorities before increasing campaign spending.
Assess a client program
Gather client intake answers and prepare an evidence-based review with a phased improvement plan.
Review operational readiness
Assess reply handling, booking, sales handoffs, and reporting alongside targeting and messaging.
試試這些提示
Start an outbound audit
Audit our B2B cold email program. Ask for infrastructure, targeting, messaging, and operations context in one intake message before scoring.
Review supplied intake answers
Review these intake answers: [answers]. Identify missing evidence and unavailable references before assigning any scores.
Score and prioritize improvements
Use this audit rubric: [rubric] and these program details: [details]. Score each point and dimension, normalize the total, and rank three improvements.
Build an accountable improvement plan
Use this completed audit: [audit] and these constraints: [constraints]. Assign owners and verification metrics across days 1-14, 15-45, and 46-90.
最佳實務
- Supply complete intake answers and the actual scoring rubric before requesting a numeric grade.
- Share aggregate metrics and sanitized email samples instead of credentials or unnecessary personal data.
- Prioritize infrastructure fixes and give each improvement an owner and a measurable verification target.
避免
- Inventing missing rubric criteria or treating unanswered questions as verified evidence.
- Scaling send volume before resolving known infrastructure and deliverability problems.
- Treating an audit score as proof of legal compliance or guaranteed campaign performance.
常見問題
Which tools are supported?
The report lists Claude, Codex, and Claude Code. The skill source expects activation through the parent cold-email skill.
What does the audit cover?
It covers infrastructure, targeting, messaging, and operations, with 8, 8, 8, and 6 available points respectively.
How is the overall score calculated?
Divide earned points by 30 and multiply by 100. Individual rubric points receive 0, 0.5, or 1.
Is the complete scoring rubric included?
No. The reviewed package contains only SKILL.md and references a separate rubric and framework that must be supplied.
Does it test DNS settings or send emails?
No automated tests or sending actions are defined. The workflow evaluates supplied context and produces recommendations.
What does the final report contain?
It contains an overall score, dimension results, three ranked priorities, and a 90-day plan. Point-by-point detail is optional.