技能 w-council

📦

w-council

Name: w-council
Author: blockmatic

內容修訂 r1 安全 📁 檔案系統存取

Explore Codebases With Parallel Agents

Codebase investigations can miss important context when one review follows a single path. This skill coordinates focused explorers, reconciles their evidence, and produces a clear handoff.

支援: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 77 銅級

Maintain this Skill? Claim it 🥉 77 銅級

使用我的智慧代理安裝

將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。

智能體請求

Review the Skillstore skill "w-council" from https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-council.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/blockmatic-w-council/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。

Agent 可讀資源

當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。

Markdown 詳情 GET /skills/blockmatic-w-council.md 已簽名 manifest GET /api/skills/blockmatic-w-council/manifest 已簽名 lockfile GET /api/skills/blockmatic-w-council/lockfile

測試它

正在使用「w-council」。 Investigate how session expiration works in this repository.

預期結果:

The session flow is owned by the authentication package. Reports identify the token parser, refresh handler, and expiration tests as the key evidence.

正在使用「w-council」。 Explore the build pipeline before I ask for a change.

預期結果:

Architecture: the pipeline begins with repository configuration and delegates packaging to the release workflow.
Evidence: the current behavior is supported by the workflow definitions and their related tests.
Handoff: implementation should begin by confirming the release trigger and preserving existing artifact checks.

安全審計

安全

v1 • 2026/9/20 開啟版本化報告

The only static finding is a false positive. The flagged sequence is a relative Markdown link to adjacent skill guidance, not user-controlled filesystem traversal, and no additional semantic security findings were identified.

已掃描檔案

分析行數

複核項目

已忽略的誤報

風險因素

📁 檔案系統存取 (1)

SKILL.md:12

最近一次完成的靜態與語意稽核未偵測到已確認的安全發現。這並不能證明該 Skill 沒有副作用。

審計單位: codex

分享與引用此報告

分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。

開啟版本化報告

複製報告連結

https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-council/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 徽章

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/blockmatic-w-council/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-council?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 徽章

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-council?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/blockmatic-w-council/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

嵌入卡片

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/blockmatic-w-council.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 引用

blockmatic. (2026). w-council security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-council/audits/1

BibTeX 引用

@techreport{blockmatic-blockmatic-w-council-2026,
  author = {blockmatic},
  title = {w-council security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-council/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "w-council security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "blockmatic"
date-released: "2026-09-20"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-council/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:blockmatic-w-council:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 評分

評分依據證據置信度: 中

架構

可維護性

內容

社群

規範符合度

你可以打造什麼

Map an unfamiliar repository

Ask the skill to identify owning packages, current behavior, and relevant architecture before a larger engineering task.

Investigate a focused bug area

Use parallel explorers to examine a suspected subsystem from implementation, history, and edge-case perspectives.

Prepare an implementation handoff

Request an evidence-based plan with references, assumptions, and explicit deferrals for another agent or teammate.

試試這些提示

Start a repository investigation

Use w-council to inspect the authentication area. Summarize its owning packages, current behavior, and the files that matter most.

Compare investigation angles

Use w-council to investigate the cache invalidation issue with separate explorers for implementation flow, tests, and unusual edge cases.

Validate findings against the tree

Use w-council to investigate the deployment pipeline. Reconcile every report against the current tree and identify findings that lack file evidence.

Produce a constrained handoff

Use w-council to investigate the proposed API change, then provide references, three to five assumptions, deferred questions, and an implementation-ready handoff without editing files.

最佳實務

Give the investigation a specific area, behavior, or question.
Ask explorers to use distinct angles with bounded scopes.
Require every important conclusion to include file evidence.

避免

Do not request implementation when you only need an investigation.
Do not accept agent summaries without checking the current tree.
Do not split a small question into unnecessary parallel runs.

常見問題

What does w-council do?

It coordinates a small group of codebase explorers, then reconciles their reports into an evidence-based handoff.

Does it edit repository files?

No. It inspects and plans. Implementation requires a separate request and the appropriate build workflow.

How many explorers does it use?

It defaults to two or three explorers and adjusts the count to the investigation scope.

Can it investigate changing working trees?

Yes. It asks for re-verification when the working tree changes during the investigation.

What should a handoff include?

A useful handoff includes evidence, references, assumptions, unresolved questions, and deferred work.

Does it replace code review?

No. It improves discovery and planning, but tests, implementation review, and security validation remain necessary.

開發者詳細資訊

作者

blockmatic

授權

MIT

Skillstore 修訂

版本提示

作者未聲明版本。

儲存庫

https://github.com/blockmatic/basilic-skills/tree/5fa16493413923e31f1df31f7260224f0f291d9e/skills/w-council

引用

80d63d9c11ea03b64ed0d4e578bac3a9acbe4c91

維護新鮮度

2026/9/20

使用量

0 次下載 · 0 次瀏覽

檔案結構

📄 SKILL.md