review-my-diff
Review Your Diff Before Opening a Pull Request
Local changes can hide bugs, security gaps, and missing tests before human review. This skill guides an evidence-based review with prioritized findings and explicit verification results.
使用我的智慧代理安裝
將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。
Review the Skillstore skill "review-my-diff" from https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。
Agent 可讀資源
當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。
測試它
正在使用「review-my-diff」。 Illustrative scenario: review a change that removes required input validation and adds no regression test.
預期結果:
- Intent: simplify request processing.
- Checks run: none; this illustrative scenario provides no runnable repository.
- Blocker summary: required validation is missing, allowing invalid requests into processing.
- Suggested fix: restore validation and add a regression test.
- Recommendation: needs rework because invalid input is not rejected.
正在使用「review-my-diff」。 Illustrative scenario: review a small refactor where executed checks pass and inspection finds no actionable issue.
預期結果:
- Intent: reorganize existing logic without changing behavior.
- Checks run: the review lists the exact commands and passing results from the actual session.
- Blockers: nothing found.
- Should fix: nothing found.
- Looks good: existing behavior and regression coverage are preserved.
- Recommendation: ready for human review; this is not approval.
安全審計
安全All six static findings are false positives involving ordinary Git commands, Markdown formatting, or legitimate review instructions. No evidence found of credential theft, data exfiltration, malicious reconnaissance, or prompt injection. Running project checks executes repository code and requires a trusted environment.
風險因素
⚙️ 外部命令 (3)
分享與引用此報告
分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。
複製報告連結
https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/audits/2?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
agentkitco. (2026). review-my-diff security audit report (audit version 2) [Author version 1.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/audits/2BibTeX 引用
@techreport{agentkitco-agentkitco-review-my-diff-2026,
author = {agentkitco},
title = {review-my-diff security audit report (audit version 2)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {2},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/audits/2},
note = {Author version 1.0}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "review-my-diff security audit report (audit version 2)"
version: "1.0"
type: report
authors:
- name: "agentkitco"
date-released: "2026-10-22"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-review-my-diff/audits/2"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:agentkitco-review-my-diff:audit:2"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore 評分
評分依據 證據置信度: 中你可以打造什麼
Check Local Changes Before a Pull Request
Review staged and unstaged changes for bugs, unsafe behavior, and missing tests before requesting feedback.
Inspect a Contributor Branch
Compare a contributor branch against its base and examine compatibility risks, surrounding callers, and test coverage.
Prioritize Review Work on Large Changes
Review a large diff by directory and separate blockers from smaller fixes, documenting coverage and unresolved questions.
試試這些提示
Review my staged and unstaged changes before I open a pull request. Report prioritized findings with file and line evidence. Do not edit files.
Review this branch against the default branch using the merge base. State the intended change and check correctness, safety, and compatibility. Do not edit files.
Review my diff with attention to error handling, input validation, and missing regression tests. Run available quick checks and separate verified problems from suspicions.
Review this large branch by directory, tracing affected callers, public interfaces, configuration, and migrations. Document coverage, skipped checks, blockers, and questions. End with a readiness recommendation.
最佳實務
- State the intended behavior and confirm the comparison base before reviewing branch changes.
- Use a trusted environment for project checks, since tests and development tools execute repository code.
- Require file and line evidence, exact check results, and explicit disclosure of unreviewed areas.
避免
- Requesting automatic approval or treating the recommendation as a substitute for human review.
- Assuming a review edits files or fixes reported issues without an explicit request.
- Accepting unsupported findings or assuming that unreported tests passed.
常見問題
Which changes can this skill review?
Does it modify my files?
Does it run tests?
How are findings organized?
Can it handle a large diff?
Does a ready recommendation approve my pull request?
開發者詳細資訊
作者
agentkitco授權
MIT
作者版本
v1.0
Skillstore 修訂
r2
版本提示
作者聲明的版本不符合 SemVer 規範。
引用
18efac79a818d7e997295839638fdd21906cfd1c
維護新鮮度
2026/10/22
使用量
6 次下載 · 0 次瀏覽
檔案結構
📄 SKILL.md