技能 brag-doc-from-git
📦

brag-doc-from-git

v1.0 內容修訂 r1 中風險 ⚙️ 外部命令

Build an Evidence-Based Brag Document from Git

Review preparation is difficult when contributions are scattered across pull requests, commits, and personal notes. This skill groups that evidence into a Markdown draft and marks missing results instead of inventing impact.

支援: Claude Codex Code(CC)
Maintain this Skill? Claim it 📊 70 尚可

使用我的智慧代理安裝

將此請求複製給你的智慧代理，其中包含權威 Skill 頁面和清單。

智能體請求
Review the Skillstore skill "brag-doc-from-git" from https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

你的智慧代理仍應顯示其計畫，並依安全政策請求必要確認。

Agent 可讀資源

當 AI Agent、爬蟲或腳本需要乾淨脈絡、而不是讀取完整頁面時，請使用這些連結。

Markdown 詳情 GET /skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git.md 已簽名 manifest GET /api/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/manifest 已簽名 lockfile GET /api/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/lockfile

測試它

正在使用「brag-doc-from-git」。 Sample evidence: PR #42 added retry handling on March 12. No outcome metrics were provided.

預期結果:

  • Theme: Reliability
  • What I did: Added retry handling.
  • Result: [GAP: What changed for users or the team?]
  • Evidence: March 12, supplied PR #42 reference.
  • Priority question: Do incident records show a change in failed requests after deployment?

正在使用「brag-doc-from-git」。 Sample notes: I owned the cache integration in a team project. User-provided measurements show response time fell from 240 ms to 180 ms.

預期結果:

  • Theme: Performance
  • What I did: Contributed the cache integration to a team performance project.
  • Result: User-provided measurements show response time decreased from 240 ms to 180 ms.
  • Scope signal: Owned the cache integration, not the entire project.
  • Evidence gap: Add the project link and measurement source.

安全審計

中風險
v2 • 2026/10/22 開啟版本化報告

All six static findings are false positives from Markdown delimiters, inline examples, or legitimate review-writing instructions. The authenticated GitHub search lacks repository filters and can retrieve private repository metadata outside the user-approved scope. No evidence found of malicious intent, credential theft, destructive commands, or audit-directed prompt injection.

1
已掃描檔案
50
分析行數
0
複核項目
0
已忽略的誤報

已確認的安全問題 (1)

中
SKILL.md:16-24
Authenticated Search Exceeds Approved Repository Scope
The GitHub CLI search filters by author and merge date but not repository. It can retrieve private PR metadata from unnamed repositories, contradicting the explicit access restriction.
Line 19 has no repository filter despite the access restriction on line 24. Actual exposure depends on authenticated account permissions and matching PRs.

風險因素

⚙️ 外部命令 (4)
SKILL.md:18-20 SKILL.md:20-22 SKILL.md:22-35 SKILL.md:35-41
審計單位: codex 檢視審計紀錄 →
分享與引用此報告

分享版本化評估報告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片與引用。Skillstore 只報告證據，不判斷該 Skill 是否安全。

開啟版本化報告
安全評估

複製報告連結

https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/audits/2?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 徽章

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 徽章

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

嵌入卡片

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
學術引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 引用

agentkitco. (2026). brag-doc-from-git security audit report (audit version 2) [Author version 1.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/audits/2

BibTeX 引用

@techreport{agentkitco-agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git-2026, author = {agentkitco}, title = {brag-doc-from-git security audit report (audit version 2)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {2}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/audits/2}, note = {Author version 1.0} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "brag-doc-from-git security audit report (audit version 2)" version: "1.0" type: report authors: - name: "agentkitco" date-released: "2026-10-22" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git/audits/2" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:agentkitco-brag-doc-from-git:audit:2" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 評分

評分依據 證據置信度: 中
55
架構
85
可維護性
87
內容
65
社群
91
規範符合度

你可以打造什麼

Prepare a Performance Self-Review

Group recent engineering contributions into evidence-backed themes and identify missing outcomes before submitting a review.

Assemble Promotion Evidence

Organize supported leadership, cross-team work, and technical contributions while preserving accurate ownership and evidence links.

Refresh Resume Accomplishments

Convert verified contributions into resume material and remove confidential details intended only for internal documents.

試試這些提示

Start a Brag Document 
Create a brag document for my last six months of work. Ask me which repositories to use before collecting evidence.
Review Local Contributions 
Use local Git history in [repository] for [author email] since [date]. Group contributions by theme and mark unknown results as gaps.
Combine Code and Team Contributions 
Draft my self-review for [date range] using only [approved repositories]. Restrict GitHub queries to those repositories. Include [mentoring and incident notes].
Prepare a Promotion Outline 
Build a promotion outline from [approved evidence and notes]. Preserve team attribution, distinguish verified outcomes from gaps, and rank missing evidence. Ask three priority questions.

最佳實務

  • Agree on the time window and repository list, then add explicit repository filters before running GitHub searches.
  • Provide outcome measurements, evidence links, and notes about contributions that Git does not record.
  • Review attribution and remove confidential information before sharing the draft outside your organization.

避免

  • Treating commit counts or pull request titles as proof of business impact.
  • Claiming sole ownership of team results without evidence of your specific contribution.
  • Running an unrestricted account-wide search when only named repositories are approved.

常見問題

Which AI tools can use this skill?
The skill lists Claude, Codex, and Claude Code as supported tools.
Does it require GitHub?
No. It includes a local Git log alternative filtered by author and start date.
What happens when results are unknown?
The draft marks missing outcomes with visible gaps and ends with prioritized questions instead of inventing metrics.
Can it include mentoring and incident work?
Yes. It asks for user notes about mentoring, incidents, reviews, and other contributions that Git history may not capture.
Will it search only the repositories I name?
The prose requires that boundary, but the example command lacks repository filters. Add explicit filters before running it.
What formats can it produce?
It produces Markdown and offers to adapt the final document into a self-review, promotion packet outline, or resume bullets.

開發者詳細資訊

作者

agentkitco

授權

MIT

作者版本

v1.0

Skillstore 修訂

r1

版本提示

作者聲明的版本不符合 SemVer 規範。

儲存庫

https://github.com/agentkitco/agentkit-dev-skills/tree/a5058856442fcb89bd538b1c01f94558488bfac3/skills/brag-doc-from-git

引用

18efac79a818d7e997295839638fdd21906cfd1c

維護新鮮度

2026/10/22

使用量

5 次下載 · 1 次瀏覽

檔案結構

📄 SKILL.md