webask-quiz-logic
Configure WebAsk Survey Branching
Incorrect survey routing can trap respondents or show irrelevant questions. This skill guides an assistant through reading WebAsk survey structure, updating conditions, and reviewing each route.
使用我的智能体安装
将此请求复制给你的智能体，其中包含权威 Skill 页面和清单。
Review the Skillstore skill "webask-quiz-logic" from https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-quiz-logic.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/webaskio-webask-quiz-logic/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智能体仍应展示其计划，并按安全策略请求必要确认。
Agent 可读资源
当 AI Agent、爬虫或脚本需要干净上下文，而不是读取完整页面时，请使用这些链接。
测试它
正在使用“webask-quiz-logic”。 Show the existing explanation question only when the rating is below four.
预期结果:
- Example route: ratings below four lead to the explanation question, then continue to the next block.
- Ratings of four or higher skip the explanation question and continue to the same block.
- Both routes have an exit without returning to an earlier question.
正在使用“webask-quiz-logic”。 Why does typing a particular word under Other not trigger my branch?
预期结果:
The condition matches selection of the Other option, not the text entered beside it. Base the branch on that option selection.
正在使用“webask-quiz-logic”。 Screen out ineligible respondents and stop accepting a group after 200 responses.
预期结果:
- Example route: respondents failing the eligibility condition go to the screenout destination.
- Eligible respondents continue while their group remains below 200 responses.
- Once the quota is reached, additional respondents from that group do not proceed.
安全审计
安全All four static findings are false positives: README navigation links and Markdown code spans do not perform filesystem traversal or shell execution. The skill describes reading survey structure and updating routing through WebAsk MCP tools. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential theft, or unauthorized data transfer in the reviewed files; external tool implementations were not included.
风险因素
📁 文件系统访问 (1)
⚙️ 外部命令 (3)
分享与引用此报告
分享版本化评估报告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片和引用。Skillstore 只报告证据，不判断该 Skill 是否安全。
复制报告链接
https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-quiz-logic/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-quiz-logic?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-quiz-logic?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/webaskio-webask-quiz-logic/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/webaskio-webask-quiz-logic.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学术引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
webaskio. (2026). webask-quiz-logic security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-quiz-logic/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{webaskio-webaskio-webask-quiz-logic-2026,
author = {webaskio},
title = {webask-quiz-logic security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-quiz-logic/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "webask-quiz-logic security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "webaskio"
date-released: "2026-09-29"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/webaskio-webask-quiz-logic/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:webaskio-webask-quiz-logic:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore 评分
评分依据 证据置信度: 中你能构建什么
Route customer feedback
Ask dissatisfied customers for details while letting other respondents skip irrelevant follow-up questions.
Screen research participants
Send ineligible respondents to a dedicated screenout and limit participation when a target group reaches its quota.
Review existing survey routes
Inspect condition ordering, branch exits, and backward transitions before making targeted routing changes.
试试这些提示
In WebAsk survey [survey], ask the existing follow-up question when the rating is below four. Read the structure first and describe the route.
In WebAsk survey [survey], skip the service-quality block for respondents who did not use the service. Keep existing questions and check both routes.
Read WebAsk survey [survey]. Route respondents failing [eligibility criteria] to screenout and cap [group] at [count] responses. Review condition order and exits.
Inspect WebAsk survey [survey] for dead ends, backward loops, incompatible operators, and conflicting conditions. Explain proposed repairs, apply approved logic changes, and summarize every route.
最佳实践
- Read the current survey structure before every routing change and use the returned question identifiers.
- Match operators to question types and order conditions carefully because the first matching condition wins.
- Review every branch through completion and provide a written route map when branching becomes complex.
避免
- Guessing question identifiers or writing routing rules without first reading the survey structure.
- Changing survey questions and routing together, making failures harder to diagnose.
- Creating backward transitions or branches without an explicit exit.
常见问题
Which tools does this skill use?
Can it create new questions?
Can it configure screening and quotas?
Does Other match the text a respondent enters?
Does it automatically test every survey path?
What happens when a service limit blocks a change?
开发者详情
作者
webaskio许可证
MIT
Skillstore 修订
r1
版本提示
作者未声明版本。
引用
bad9dafc37d1638cd29cb9bab06d5f8dbcd0f6c2
维护新鲜度
2026/9/30
使用量
0 次下载 · 0 次浏览
文件结构