wiki-researcher
用证据研究代码库
如果不追踪真实实现,深入的代码库问题很难回答。此技能会引导 Claude、Codex 和 Claude Code 进行结构化的、基于证据的研究。
使用我的智能体安装
将此请求复制给你的智能体,其中包含权威 Skill 页面和清单。
Review the Skillstore skill "wiki-researcher" from https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-wiki-researcher.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/sickn33-wiki-researcher/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智能体仍应展示其计划,并按安全策略请求必要确认。
Agent 可读资源
当 AI Agent、爬虫或脚本需要干净上下文,而不是读取完整页面时,请使用这些链接。
测试它
正在使用“wiki-researcher”。 说明此仓库中的用户身份验证如何工作。
预期结果:
识别路由注册、请求处理程序、令牌验证、会话存储以及带引用的置信度级别。
正在使用“wiki-researcher”。 追踪定价数据来自哪里以及在哪里显示。
预期结果:
展示入口点、服务调用、转换、UI 使用方,以及未追踪路径的开放问题。
正在使用“wiki-researcher”。 评审通知子系统的技术债。
预期结果:
列出耦合、重复模式、风险区域,以及带支持性文件引用的建议后续步骤。
安全审计
安全The two static findings are false positives in Markdown prose, not executable behavior. The first is inline-code formatting for citation syntax, and the second is guidance for diagrams in architecture explanations. No prompt injection or malicious intent was found in SKILL.md.
风险因素
⚙️ 外部命令 (1)
分享与引用此报告
分享版本化评估报告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片和引用。Skillstore 只报告证据,不判断该 Skill 是否安全。
复制报告链接
https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-wiki-researcher/audits/5?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-wiki-researcher?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-wiki-researcher?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/sickn33-wiki-researcher/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/sickn33-wiki-researcher.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学术引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
sickn33. (2026). wiki-researcher security audit report (audit version 5) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-wiki-researcher/audits/5BibTeX 引用
@techreport{sickn33-sickn33-wiki-researcher-2026,
author = {sickn33},
title = {wiki-researcher security audit report (audit version 5)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {5},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-wiki-researcher/audits/5},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "wiki-researcher security audit report (audit version 5)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "sickn33"
date-released: "2026-07-07"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/sickn33-wiki-researcher/audits/5"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:sickn33-wiki-researcher:audit:5"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore 评分
评分依据 证据置信度: 高你能构建什么
梳理功能
开发者追踪某个功能如何经过入口点、服务、数据存储和输出。
准备架构说明
技术写作者在记录子系统工作方式之前,收集有依据的证据。
评估技术债
工程负责人在规划重构工作之前,评审耦合、反模式和风险。
试试这些提示
Use wiki-researcher to explain how [component] works. Trace the real implementation and cite every significant claim.
Use wiki-researcher to trace how [data or request] moves from [entry point] to [destination]. Include transformations, dependencies, and open questions.
Use wiki-researcher to compare how [feature A] and [feature B] are implemented. Identify shared paths, differences, risks, and evidence.
Use wiki-researcher to produce a full five-pass analysis of [system]. Cover architecture, state, integrations, patterns, recommendations, confidence, and unanswered questions.
最佳实践
- 从狭窄主题开始,仅在追踪需要时再扩展范围。
- 要求为每个重要结论提供引用和置信度评级。
- 在每轮研究之后,使用后续提示来解决开放问题。
避免
- 不要在没有指定具体系统或功能的情况下要求总结整个仓库。
- 不要接受未关联到已验证实现路径的图表。
- 不要在没有引用证据的情况下将推断出的架构当作事实。