技能 same-idea-both-platforms

📦

same-idea-both-platforms

Name: same-idea-both-platforms
Author: prateeks367

内容修订 r1 安全 ⚙️ 外部命令

Turn One Idea into Twitter and LinkedIn Posts

Identical posts often lack the structure each platform expects. This skill writes separate Twitter and LinkedIn drafts from one idea and explains their differences.

支持: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 77 青铜

使用我的智能体安装

将此请求复制给你的智能体，其中包含权威 Skill 页面和清单。

智能体请求

Review the Skillstore skill "same-idea-both-platforms" from https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

你的智能体仍应展示其计划，并按安全策略请求必要确认。

Agent 可读资源

当 AI Agent、爬虫或脚本需要干净上下文，而不是读取完整页面时，请使用这些链接。

Markdown 详情 GET /skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms.md 已签名 manifest GET /api/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/manifest 已签名 lockfile GET /api/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/lockfile

测试它

正在使用“same-idea-both-platforms”。 Create Twitter and LinkedIn posts about testing a signup form before rebuilding the whole website.

预期结果:

Core idea: Test the signup form before committing to a full website rebuild.
Twitter: Before rebuilding your website, test the signup form. A smaller experiment can tell you where the real problem is.
LinkedIn: A website redesign is a large commitment. Testing the signup form first can reveal whether the problem needs a smaller change.
Difference: Twitter leads with the recommendation; LinkedIn introduces the decision and its context.

正在使用“same-idea-both-platforms”。 Write both posts about recording the reasons behind team decisions.

预期结果:

Core idea: Record why a team made a decision, not just what it decided.
Twitter: A decision log needs the reason, not just the result. Future teammates will need to understand what you were solving.
LinkedIn: When a team records a decision, the outcome is only part of the story. Include the constraints and alternatives behind it. That context helps future teammates understand the choice before revisiting it.
Difference: Twitter compresses the lesson; LinkedIn adds practical context and separates the supporting points.

安全审计

安全

v1 • 2026/10/2 打开版本化报告

All three static detections are false positives caused by Markdown backticks around tool names, not Ruby or shell execution. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential theft, or data exfiltration in SKILL.md. The optional VoiceMOAT workflow describes separate previews and explicit approvals for each post.

已扫描文件

分析行数

复核项

已忽略误报

风险因素

⚙️ 外部命令 (3)

SKILL.md:58 SKILL.md:61 SKILL.md:63

最新一次完成的静态与语义审计未检测到已确认的安全发现。这并不能证明该 Skill 没有副作用。

审计者: codex

分享与引用此报告

分享版本化评估报告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片和引用。Skillstore 只报告证据，不判断该 Skill 是否安全。

打开版本化报告

复制报告链接

https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 徽章

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 徽章

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

嵌入卡片

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

学术引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 引用

prateeks367. (2026). same-idea-both-platforms security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/audits/1

BibTeX 引用

@techreport{prateeks367-prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms-2026,
  author = {prateeks367},
  title = {same-idea-both-platforms security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "same-idea-both-platforms security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "prateeks367"
date-released: "2026-10-02"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:prateeks367-same-idea-both-platforms:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 评分

评分依据证据置信度: 中

架构

可维护性

内容

社区

规范符合性

你能构建什么

Share a product lesson

Turn one product lesson into a concise Twitter statement and a contextual LinkedIn post.

Explain a technical insight

Present a technical insight differently for Twitter readers and LinkedIn professionals without changing the central claim.

Prepare paired client drafts

Create distinct drafts for both platforms and explain the structural choices during client review.

试试这些提示

Draft a simple post pair

Write separate Twitter and LinkedIn posts about [idea]. State the core idea first, then give both drafts and one sentence explaining their differences.

Extract an idea from existing text

Use [source text] to identify one core idea. Ask for clarification if needed, then write independent Twitter and LinkedIn drafts and explain the differences.

Review and rewrite a post pair

Review [Twitter draft] and [LinkedIn draft] for misplaced platform phrasing and repeated sentences. Rewrite both from their shared idea and explain the structural changes.

Use connected platform profiles

With VoiceMOAT connected, draft both posts about [idea] using each platform profile and score each draft. Preview separately; request approval before scheduling each.

最佳实践

Confirm the central idea in plain language before writing either post.
Write each draft independently and check for phrasing that belongs to the other platform.
Review both drafts for accuracy and approve each post separately when using connected publishing tools.

避免

Copying identical wording to both platforms and changing only the length.
Drafting from an unclear paragraph without identifying its main point.
Treating approval for one platform as permission to publish on both.

常见问题

What does this skill produce?

It produces a core idea, separate Twitter and LinkedIn drafts, and a short explanation of the differences.

Can I provide an existing post?

Yes. The skill extracts the underlying idea and writes both versions independently instead of copying the original wording.

Can I use it for only one platform?

That is outside its intended scope. The workflow is designed to produce both Twitter and LinkedIn posts.

Do I need VoiceMOAT to draft posts?

No. The core drafting workflow works without VoiceMOAT; platform profiles, scoring, publishing, and scheduling depend on the connector.

What does the VoiceMOAT connector require?

The skill states that the connector requires a VoiceMOAT Pro or Enterprise plan.

Will both posts publish automatically?

No. The connected workflow specifies a separate preview and one-time confirmation for each post.

开发者详情

作者

prateeks367

许可证

MIT

Skillstore 修订

版本提示

作者未声明版本。

仓库

https://github.com/prateeks367/voicemoat-skills/tree/b1749d2bf583cf8c78baf246f6007522e8c052a2/skills/same-idea-both-platforms

引用

5726d703fd79596f46a4232d911221f962d9af1d

维护新鲜度

2026/10/2

使用量

0 次下载 · 0 次浏览

文件结构

📄 SKILL.md