am-i-drifting
Identify Changes in Your Writing Voice
Recent posts can lose familiar writing habits without making the changes obvious. This skill compares your past and present writing and recommends concrete habits to restore.
使用我的智能体安装
将此请求复制给你的智能体，其中包含权威 Skill 页面和清单。
Review the Skillstore skill "am-i-drifting" from https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-am-i-drifting.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/prateeks367-am-i-drifting/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智能体仍应展示其计划，并按安全策略请求必要确认。
Agent 可读资源
当 AI Agent、爬虫或脚本需要干净上下文，而不是读取完整页面时，请使用这些链接。
测试它
正在使用“am-i-drifting”。 Compare five older posts with personal stories and five recent posts using broad industry claims.
预期结果:
- Earlier voice: Four of five posts begin with a personal event, followed by a specific lesson.
- Recent voice: None begin with personal events; three start with broad industry claims.
- Change: Personal openings have been replaced by general statements.
- Before recommending changes: Was this shift intended for a different audience?
- Possible habit to restore: Begin selected posts with a concrete event you experienced.
正在使用“am-i-drifting”。 I only have my five latest posts. Can you tell whether my voice has changed?
预期结果:
I can describe your current writing, but I cannot establish a change without older samples. Please provide earlier posts from a distinct period.
正在使用“am-i-drifting”。 Can my connected LinkedIn account provide a scored Voice Guard comparison?
预期结果:
Voice Guard scored drift is Twitter only. LinkedIn can provide Voice Lab analysis and posts, provided Voice Lab has run on the account.
安全审计
安全Both static findings are false positives: backticks mark tool names in Markdown, not executable Ruby or shell commands. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential extraction, or unauthorized data transfer in the reviewed skill. VoiceMOAT integration is described as optional account analysis through named tools.
风险因素
⚙️ 外部命令 (2)
分享与引用此报告
分享版本化评估报告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片和引用。Skillstore 只报告证据，不判断该 Skill 是否安全。
复制报告链接
https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-am-i-drifting/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-am-i-drifting?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-am-i-drifting?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/prateeks367-am-i-drifting/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/prateeks367-am-i-drifting.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学术引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
prateeks367. (2026). am-i-drifting security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-am-i-drifting/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{prateeks367-prateeks367-am-i-drifting-2026,
author = {prateeks367},
title = {am-i-drifting security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-am-i-drifting/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "am-i-drifting security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "prateeks367"
date-released: "2026-10-02"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/prateeks367-am-i-drifting/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:prateeks367-am-i-drifting:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore 评分
评分依据 证据置信度: 中你能构建什么
Review Personal Posting Habits
Compare earlier and recent posts to identify lost personal details, changed openings, or increased hedging.
Assess a Deliberate Audience Change
Check whether a new professional audience explains a changed register before deciding which familiar habits to restore.
Support an Evidence-Based Editorial Review
Review one client against their own earlier writing and offer up to three concrete adjustments supported by sample differences.
试试这些提示
Compare these five older posts with these five recent posts from me. Describe each period, then name specific changes. Older: [posts]. Recent: [posts].
Review my older and recent posts for hedging, abstraction, length changes, and fewer personal details. Cite examples without a score. Older: [posts]. Recent: [posts].
My audience changed from [old audience] to [new audience]. Compare my older and recent posts, ask about intent, and recommend at most three habits. Older: [posts]. Recent: [posts].
With my connected VoiceMOAT account, review voice insights, posts, and analytics. Use Voice Guard drift if available on Twitter. Explain unavailable evidence and recommend up to three habits.
最佳实践
- Provide five older posts from a period you valued and five recent posts, with a meaningful time gap.
- State audience, role, or tone changes that may explain intentional differences.
- Request concrete sample evidence and prioritize no more than three habits to restore.
避免
- Comparing different writers instead of one writer against their own past.
- Requesting a precise voice score from ten pasted posts or inferring trends without older samples.
- Treating every style change as deterioration without checking the intended audience or register.
常见问题
What samples should I provide?
Can this work without older posts?
Will it give my writing a score?
Can it prove AI changed my voice?
Do I need VoiceMOAT?
Does LinkedIn support scored drift analysis?
开发者详情
作者
prateeks367许可证
MIT
Skillstore 修订
r1
版本提示
作者未声明版本。
引用
5726d703fd79596f46a4232d911221f962d9af1d
维护新鲜度
2026/10/2
使用量
0 次下载 · 0 次浏览
文件结构
📄 SKILL.md