技能 mantis-structural-index
📦
mantis-structural-index
内容修订 r1 高风险 ⚙️ 外部命令📁 文件系统访问
Build Snapshot-Aware Source Code Indexes
Large source trees make symbol navigation and caller discovery expensive. This skill guides structural indexing with reusable caches and coverage-aware queries while preserving lexical discovery.
支持: Claude Codex Code(CC)
安装前请停下并请求确认。
请审查安装计划，并在更改文件前获得用户明确同意。
使用我的智能体安装
将此请求复制给你的智能体，其中包含权威 Skill 页面和清单。
智能体请求
Review the Skillstore skill "mantis-structural-index" from https://skillstore.io/skills/google-mantis-structural-index.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/google-mantis-structural-index/manifest. Verify the artifact. Stop and obtain explicit user consent before installing or changing files.你的智能体仍应展示其计划，并按安全策略请求必要确认。
Agent 可读资源
当 AI Agent、爬虫或脚本需要干净上下文，而不是读取完整页面时，请使用这些链接。
测试它
正在使用“mantis-structural-index”。 Illustrative request: index a live repository using only a heuristic backend.
预期结果:
- Snapshot provenance: unknown; a fresh build is required.
- Backend precision: heuristic; structural matches remain advisory.
- Returned artifacts: manifest, SQLite catalog, and query helper.
- Coverage summary distinguishes indexed, deferred, and failed files.
正在使用“mantis-structural-index”。 Illustrative request: find callers when the relevant partition is only partially indexed.
预期结果:
- Result status: no indexed callers; coverage is partial.
- This does not establish that the function has no callers.
- Run lexical discovery and retain all candidates alongside structural hints.
安全审计
高风险v1 • 2026/10/4 打开版本化报告
All 225 static matches are documentation syntax or legitimate indexing operations, not the reported threats. Semantic review identifies forgeable helper-version checks and missing remote-query disclosure controls. No evidence found of malicious payloads, credential theft, or audit-directed prompt injection in the supplied skill.
1
已扫描文件
747
分析行数
0
复核项
0
已忽略误报
已确认安全问题 (2)
高
Helper Reuse Relies on a Forgeable Version Marker
Existing executable helpers are reused after checking only the marker '# MANTIS_HELPER_VERSION = 5'. An attacker who can modify workspace helpers can retain that marker and substitute code executed during indexing or queries.
The instructions explicitly permit helper reuse based on a public version comment without requiring content integrity or trusted ownership. Exploitation requires workspace write access; no actual substituted helper was supplied.
中
Remote Queries Lack an Explicit Data-Disclosure Boundary
Remote query providers can be selected through MANTIS_STRUCTURAL_INDEX_URL or manifest configuration. Symbol and file queries may disclose repository metadata without required endpoint approval, transport protection, or a data-sharing policy.
The specification offers remote access to operations accepting symbol names and file paths but states no explicit endpoint or disclosure restrictions. No evidence found of a malicious destination or implemented transfer; this is a conditional design risk.
风险因素
⚙️ 外部命令 (50)
SKILL.md:14 SKILL.md:15 SKILL.md:21 SKILL.md:22 SKILL.md:30 SKILL.md:32 SKILL.md:34 SKILL.md:36 SKILL.md:41 SKILL.md:43 SKILL.md:45 SKILL.md:47 SKILL.md:49 SKILL.md:52 SKILL.md:54 SKILL.md:56 SKILL.md:58 SKILL.md:60 SKILL.md:62 SKILL.md:64 SKILL.md:66 SKILL.md:68 SKILL.md:70 SKILL.md:73 SKILL.md:74 SKILL.md:75 SKILL.md:78 SKILL.md:82 SKILL.md:83 SKILL.md:84 SKILL.md:93-132 SKILL.md:132-142 SKILL.md:142 SKILL.md:143-144 SKILL.md:144-147 SKILL.md:147-148 SKILL.md:148-149 SKILL.md:149 SKILL.md:150-153 SKILL.md:153 SKILL.md:154 SKILL.md:155 SKILL.md:157-158 SKILL.md:158-171 SKILL.md:171-172 SKILL.md:172 SKILL.md:174-175 SKILL.md:175-177 SKILL.md:177 SKILL.md:178-180
审计者: codex
分享与引用此报告
分享版本化评估报告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片和引用。Skillstore 只报告证据，不判断该 Skill 是否安全。
复制报告链接
https://skillstore.io/skills/google-mantis-structural-index/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/google-mantis-structural-index?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/google-mantis-structural-index?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/google-mantis-structural-index/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/google-mantis-structural-index.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学术引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
google. (2026). mantis-structural-index security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/google-mantis-structural-index/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{google-google-mantis-structural-index-2026,
author = {google},
title = {mantis-structural-index security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/google-mantis-structural-index/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "mantis-structural-index security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "google"
date-released: "2026-10-04"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/google-mantis-structural-index/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:google-mantis-structural-index:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore 评分
评分依据 证据置信度: 中 55
架构
85
可维护性
87
内容
65
社区
83
规范符合性
你能构建什么
Navigate an Unfamiliar Codebase
Build source cross-references, resolve ambiguous symbols, and locate enclosing functions before reading implementation details.
Prioritize Security Research
Rank candidate call sites with structural hints while retaining every candidate found through repository-wide lexical discovery.
Reuse Indexing Work Across Snapshots
Reuse unchanged semantic units and report coverage, provenance, and deferred work for repeated analysis runs.
试试这些提示
Index the Current Repository
Build a local structural index for the current repository. Use unknown snapshot provenance, report coverage and backend precision, and preserve source files.
Resolve a Symbol and Its Callers
Resolve [symbol name] in [language or file]. Ask me to disambiguate matches, then list paginated caller hints with precision and coverage. Include lexical candidates.
Index a Pinned Snapshot
Index [snapshot root] using [snapshot ID] and [state root]. Verify provenance, reuse matching units, keep the snapshot read-only, and report deferred partitions.
Plan a Large Incremental Build
Index [snapshot root] locally with approved backends and verified helpers. Prioritize [target files] and changed units within [unit and byte limits]. Report reuse, remaining work, and coverage without excluding lexical candidates.
最佳实践
- Validate snapshot provenance and keep generated artifacts outside pinned source trees.
- Verify helper integrity before execution and approve any remote provider before sharing repository metadata.
- Inspect precision and coverage, disambiguate symbols, and combine structural results with lexical discovery.
避免
- Treating an empty structural query as proof that no callers exist.
- Reusing an unknown-snapshot index against a mutable live tree.
- Executing modified helpers solely because their version comment matches.
常见问题
Does this skill include executable indexing scripts?
No. The supplied file defines instructions and contracts. The agent generates builder and query helpers at runtime.
Can it run without a pinned snapshot?
Yes. It indexes the current directory with unknown provenance and rebuilds on every invocation.
Which indexing backends can it use?
It selects available backends per partition, including matched native indexes, compiler extractors, AST parsers, symbol tools, heuristics, and lexical fallback.
Does it replace repository-wide lexical searches?
No. Structural results are advisory. Consumers must retain lexical candidates and combine both result sets.
Can it analyze vulnerabilities or generate patches?
No. Its scope is source cross-reference data. Findings analysis, patching, reporting, and production build reachability are outside its scope.
Does it send repository information to remote services?
Local indexing does not require a remote provider. Optional remote queries can disclose symbol and file metadata; approve the destination before enabling them.