pricing-tribunal
Evaluate High-Stakes Pricing Changes
Material pricing changes can affect revenue and customer retention without clear evidence or approval criteria. This workflow structures hypotheses, controlled tests, decision reviews, and post-rollout audits.
使用我的智能体安装
将此请求复制给你的智能体，其中包含权威 Skill 页面和清单。
Review the Skillstore skill "pricing-tribunal" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智能体仍应展示其计划，并按安全策略请求必要确认。
Agent 可读资源
当 AI Agent、爬虫或脚本需要干净上下文，而不是读取完整页面时，请使用这些链接。
测试它
正在使用“pricing-tribunal”。 We propose usage-based pricing instead of a flat subscription. Revenue impact is estimated at 12%; reversal would take 90 days.
预期结果:
- Risk tier: Strategic because the proposal changes the value metric and exceeds 10% estimated ARR impact.
- Test window: 8-12 weeks, with executive review and grandfathering for existing customers.
- Missing inputs: predicted lift, downside concentration, falsification condition, cohort size, and kill-switch threshold.
正在使用“pricing-tribunal”。 We predicted a 20% ACV increase. The statistically significant result was 19%; side effects matched predictions and all owners approved in writing.
预期结果:
- Direction: Pass. Magnitude: Pass because 19% is within the stated tolerance around the 20% prediction.
- Side effects: Pass. Written approvals: Pass.
- Downside concentration: Not supplied. Complete this check before declaring all criteria passed or recommending rollout.
正在使用“pricing-tribunal”。 At the 30-day audit, churn exceeded our predicted downside after the pricing rollout.
预期结果:
- Audit finding: Actual downside diverged from the test prediction.
- Document the divergence reason in the failed-test registry.
- Reassess side effects and customer concentration at the 60- and 90-day reviews.
安全审计
安全All 15 static findings are false positives involving Markdown formatting, documentation references, or business experiment questions. No evidence found of command execution, malicious filesystem access, data exfiltration, or prompt injection in the reviewed file. Referenced documents were not included in the audited file set.
风险因素
分享与引用此报告
分享版本化评估报告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片和引用。Skillstore 只报告证据，不判断该 Skill 是否安全。
复制报告链接
https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学术引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
cmj-hub. (2026). pricing-tribunal security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal-2026,
author = {cmj-hub},
title = {pricing-tribunal security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "pricing-tribunal security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "cmj-hub"
date-released: "2026-10-03"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-pricing-tribunal:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore 评分
评分依据 证据置信度: 中你能构建什么
Review a Value-Metric Change
Assess a move from flat subscription pricing to usage pricing, including customer downside and strategic approval requirements.
Design a Sales Pricing Pilot
Prepare a limited prospect pilot with predicted revenue changes, cohort criteria, and a documented stop condition.
Audit a Pricing Rollout
Compare post-launch results against predictions and document unexpected effects at 30-, 60-, and 90-day reviews.
试试这些提示
Review this pricing change: [change]. Estimated ARR impact: [percentage]; affected customers: [percentage]; reversal time: [days]. Identify the risk tier and missing information.
Develop a hypothesis for [change]. Use these assumptions: [expected outcome, mechanism, and customer downside]. Include predicted magnitude, direction, and a falsification condition.
Create a tribunal test plan for [hypothesis] using [risk tier and available data]. Specify cohort, duration, kill-switch threshold, and approval owners. Mark unsupported assumptions.
Compare [test results] with [predictions] using the verdict matrix. Consider [side effects, downside concentration, and written approvals]. Recommend a verdict and post-rollout audit criteria. Identify inconclusive evidence.
最佳实践
- State expected magnitude, direction, mechanism, downside concentration, and falsification conditions before collecting results.
- Record every changed input and document inconclusive tests instead of treating them as successful evidence.
- Name approval owners, define stop thresholds, and confirm review dates with the operator.
避免
- Treating a full pricing cutover as a controlled experiment.
- Changing multiple inputs without documenting attribution limits.
- Approving rollout without complete evidence, written sign-offs, or post-rollout review dates.