linkedin-craft
Craft Clear LinkedIn Posts and Stronger Hooks
LinkedIn drafts often lack clear openings, concrete evidence, and readable structure. This skill provides hook variants, concise post formatting, and focused founder-voice critique.
使用我的智能体安装
将此请求复制给你的智能体，其中包含权威 Skill 页面和清单。
Review the Skillstore skill "linkedin-craft" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智能体仍应展示其计划，并按安全策略请求必要确认。
Agent 可读资源
当 AI Agent、爬虫或脚本需要干净上下文，而不是读取完整页面时，请使用这些链接。
测试它
正在使用“linkedin-craft”。 Suggest stronger hooks about onboarding. Supplied fact: simplifying a checklist reduced setup time from six days to four.
预期结果:
- Contrarian: Our onboarding improvement came from a simpler checklist, not another training session.
- Specific evidence: Setup time fell from six days to four after we simplified the onboarding checklist.
- Question reframe: Instead of asking what to add to onboarding, ask which steps people actually need.
- Recommended: Use the specific evidence hook because the measured result makes the improvement concrete.
正在使用“linkedin-craft”。 Format this result as a LinkedIn post: a consultant replaced three status meetings with a shared update and saved two hours weekly.
预期结果:
Replacing three status meetings saved our team two hours each week.
We moved routine updates into one shared document.
The change was simple:
- Three status meetings removed.
- One shared update introduced.
- Two hours saved each week.
Keep the conversation for decisions that need it.
#Teamwork #Productivity
正在使用“linkedin-craft”。 Critique this opening: Leadership is everything. Agree? No supporting evidence or voice rubric is supplied.
预期结果:
Weakest line: Leadership is everything.
Rewrite: Name the leadership decision and its observed result before writing the opening.
Rationale: The original claim is broad and unsupported.
Anti-pattern: The closing question requests agreement instead of adding substance.
Verdict: Start over with a concrete example.
安全审计
安全All eight static findings are false positives: seven identify Markdown backticks, and one identifies a fixed companion-skill reference. No evidence found of shell execution, unauthorized filesystem access, data exfiltration, or prompt injection in the supplied file.
风险因素
⚙️ 外部命令 (7)
📁 文件系统访问 (1)
分享与引用此报告
分享版本化评估报告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片和引用。Skillstore 只报告证据，不判断该 Skill 是否安全。
复制报告链接
https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学术引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
cmj-hub. (2026). linkedin-craft security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-linkedin-craft-2026,
author = {cmj-hub},
title = {linkedin-craft security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "linkedin-craft security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "cmj-hub"
date-released: "2026-10-03"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-linkedin-craft/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-linkedin-craft:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore 评分
评分依据 证据置信度: 中你能构建什么
Share a Founder Lesson
Turn a supplied business lesson into hook options and a concise LinkedIn post supported by concrete evidence.
Improve Client Drafts
Identify weak openings, vague evidence, and engagement bait before rewriting the weakest line.
Present Professional Results
Format a finished project reflection into short body lines, evidence bullets, and a direct closing sentence.
试试这些提示
Give me three stronger LinkedIn hooks for [topic]. Use different archetypes and recommend the strongest.
Generate five hook variants for [topic], one per archetype. Use only these facts: [facts]. Recommend a primary hook with a rationale.
Reformat this LinkedIn draft for quick reading: [draft]. Preserve the facts and voice. Use evidence bullets, at most 200 words, and three hashtags.
Critique this draft against the available founder voice rubric: [draft]. Report dimension scores, anti-patterns, the weakest-line rewrite, and an editorial verdict. Explain each score.
最佳实践
- Provide verified facts, measurements, and examples before requesting evidence-based hooks.
- Supply the companion voice rubric when requesting a detailed founder-voice critique.
- Review factual accuracy, tone, word count, and hashtags before manually publishing.
避免
- Inventing metrics or personal experiences to make a hook more persuasive.
- Adding engagement bait, emoji blocks, or more than three hashtags.
- Treating subjective critique scores as objective predictions of audience engagement.