cold-email-deliverability
Check Email Deliverability Before Launch
Authentication gaps and domain reputation problems can disrupt outreach before a campaign starts. This skill guides 15 readiness checks and organizes failures into prioritized fixes.
使用我的智能体安装
将此请求复制给你的智能体,其中包含权威 Skill 页面和清单。
Review the Skillstore skill "cold-email-deliverability" from https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-deliverability.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-deliverability/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智能体仍应展示其计划,并按安全策略请求必要确认。
Agent 可读资源
当 AI Agent、爬虫或脚本需要干净上下文,而不是读取完整页面时,请使用这些链接。
测试它
正在使用“cold-email-deliverability”。 Fourteen checks passed, but SPF does not include our sending provider. Summarize readiness and the next action.
预期结果:
- Checklist score: 93.3/100, grade B.
- Launch status: hold. The SPF failure remains a blocker despite the numerical grade.
- First action: correct provider authorization in SPF, check the DNS lookup limit, and verify authentication before sending.
正在使用“cold-email-deliverability”。 Ten checks passed. Mailbox age, sending volume, reply ratio, reverse DNS, and blacklist checks failed. Prioritize the fixes.
预期结果:
- Checklist score: 66.7/100, grade D. Hold the campaign.
- Resolve the blacklist issue first and verify reverse DNS with the sending provider.
- Reduce sending volume, continue mailbox preparation, and review reply performance before reassessing.
安全审计
中风险All 28 static findings are false positives involving Markdown, legitimate diagnostic lookups, public reference links, or a documentation path. No evidence found of credential theft, destructive actions, or prompt injection. One semantic issue remains: score-based launch advice can conflict with mandatory authentication and blacklist blockers.
已确认安全问题 (1)
风险因素
⚙️ 外部命令 (23)
🌐 网络访问 (2)
📁 文件系统访问 (1)
分享与引用此报告
分享版本化评估报告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片和引用。Skillstore 只报告证据,不判断该 Skill 是否安全。
复制报告链接
https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-deliverability/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown 徽章
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-deliverability?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML 徽章
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-deliverability?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-deliverability/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>嵌入卡片
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-deliverability.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>学术引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA 引用
cmj-hub. (2026). cold-email-deliverability security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-deliverability/audits/1BibTeX 引用
@techreport{cmj-hub-cmj-hub-cold-email-deliverability-2026,
author = {cmj-hub},
title = {cold-email-deliverability security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-deliverability/audits/1},
note = {Author version unspecified}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "cold-email-deliverability security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
- name: "cmj-hub"
date-released: "2026-10-03"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/cmj-hub-cold-email-deliverability/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:cmj-hub-cold-email-deliverability:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore 评分
评分依据 证据置信度: 中你能构建什么
Review a First Outreach Campaign
Check domain authentication, mailbox age, and sending volume before starting outreach.
Prepare a Domain Remediation Plan
Review DNS and reputation findings and prioritize the fixes that affect campaign readiness.
Standardize Client Readiness Reviews
Apply the same 15-point checklist across client sending domains and record unresolved blockers.
试试这些提示
Check deliverability for [sending_domain]. Ask for missing sending details and explain which checks require manual verification.
Review SPF, DKIM, and DMARC for [sending_domain] using provider [inbox_provider] and selector [selector]. Report observed evidence and prioritize authentication failures.
Review [sending_domain] for [from_address]. Provider: [provider]; mailbox age: [days]; daily volume: [volume]; reply ratio: [percent]. Include reputation and warm-up checks.
Run the 15-point review for [sending_domain] using [sending_details]. Show evidence, unavailable checks, score, and fix order. Keep launch blocked until blocker checks pass.
最佳实践
- Provide the sending domain, provider, DKIM selector, sending IP, mailbox age, volume, and recent reply ratio when available.
- Record observed evidence and keep unavailable checks unverified instead of treating them as passes.
- Resolve authentication failures and blacklist hits before sending, regardless of the numerical score.
避免
- Treating a high checklist score as proof of inbox placement or permission to ignore blockers.
- Providing API keys or mailbox credentials when public lookups and nonsecret sending details are sufficient.
- Applying DNS changes or increasing sending volume without verifying findings and current provider requirements.