技能 w-council

📦

w-council

Name: w-council
Author: blockmatic

内容修订 r1 安全 📁 文件系统访问

Explore Codebases With Parallel Agents

Codebase investigations can miss important context when one review follows a single path. This skill coordinates focused explorers, reconciles their evidence, and produces a clear handoff.

支持: Claude Codex Code(CC)

🥉 77 青铜

使用我的智能体安装

将此请求复制给你的智能体，其中包含权威 Skill 页面和清单。

智能体请求

Review the Skillstore skill "w-council" from https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-council.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/blockmatic-w-council/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

你的智能体仍应展示其计划，并按安全策略请求必要确认。

Agent 可读资源

当 AI Agent、爬虫或脚本需要干净上下文，而不是读取完整页面时，请使用这些链接。

Markdown 详情 GET /skills/blockmatic-w-council.md 已签名 manifest GET /api/skills/blockmatic-w-council/manifest 已签名 lockfile GET /api/skills/blockmatic-w-council/lockfile

测试它

正在使用“w-council”。 Investigate how session expiration works in this repository.

预期结果:

The session flow is owned by the authentication package. Reports identify the token parser, refresh handler, and expiration tests as the key evidence.

正在使用“w-council”。 Explore the build pipeline before I ask for a change.

预期结果:

Architecture: the pipeline begins with repository configuration and delegates packaging to the release workflow.
Evidence: the current behavior is supported by the workflow definitions and their related tests.
Handoff: implementation should begin by confirming the release trigger and preserving existing artifact checks.

安全审计

安全

v1 • 2026/9/20 打开版本化报告

The only static finding is a false positive. The flagged sequence is a relative Markdown link to adjacent skill guidance, not user-controlled filesystem traversal, and no additional semantic security findings were identified.

已扫描文件

分析行数

复核项

已忽略误报

风险因素

📁 文件系统访问 (1)

SKILL.md:12

最新一次完成的静态与语义审计未检测到已确认的安全发现。这并不能证明该 Skill 没有副作用。

审计者: codex

分享与引用此报告

分享版本化评估报告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片和引用。Skillstore 只报告证据，不判断该 Skill 是否安全。

打开版本化报告

复制报告链接

https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-council/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 徽章

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/blockmatic-w-council/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-council?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 徽章

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-council?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/blockmatic-w-council/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

嵌入卡片

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/blockmatic-w-council.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>

学术引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 引用

blockmatic. (2026). w-council security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-council/audits/1

BibTeX 引用

@techreport{blockmatic-blockmatic-w-council-2026,
  author = {blockmatic},
  title = {w-council security audit report (audit version 1)},
  institution = {Skillstore},
  year = {2026},
  number = {1},
  url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-council/audits/1},
  note = {Author version unspecified}
}

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "w-council security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "unspecified"
type: report
authors:
  - name: "blockmatic"
date-released: "2026-09-20"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/blockmatic-w-council/audits/1"
identifiers:
  - type: other
    value: "skillstore:blockmatic-w-council:audit:1"
    description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 评分

评分依据证据置信度: 中

架构

可维护性

内容

社区

规范符合性

你能构建什么

Map an unfamiliar repository

Ask the skill to identify owning packages, current behavior, and relevant architecture before a larger engineering task.

Investigate a focused bug area

Use parallel explorers to examine a suspected subsystem from implementation, history, and edge-case perspectives.

Prepare an implementation handoff

Request an evidence-based plan with references, assumptions, and explicit deferrals for another agent or teammate.

试试这些提示

Start a repository investigation

Use w-council to inspect the authentication area. Summarize its owning packages, current behavior, and the files that matter most.

Compare investigation angles

Use w-council to investigate the cache invalidation issue with separate explorers for implementation flow, tests, and unusual edge cases.

Validate findings against the tree

Use w-council to investigate the deployment pipeline. Reconcile every report against the current tree and identify findings that lack file evidence.

Produce a constrained handoff

Use w-council to investigate the proposed API change, then provide references, three to five assumptions, deferred questions, and an implementation-ready handoff without editing files.

最佳实践

Give the investigation a specific area, behavior, or question.
Ask explorers to use distinct angles with bounded scopes.
Require every important conclusion to include file evidence.

避免

Do not request implementation when you only need an investigation.
Do not accept agent summaries without checking the current tree.
Do not split a small question into unnecessary parallel runs.

常见问题

What does w-council do?

It coordinates a small group of codebase explorers, then reconciles their reports into an evidence-based handoff.

Does it edit repository files?

No. It inspects and plans. Implementation requires a separate request and the appropriate build workflow.

How many explorers does it use?

It defaults to two or three explorers and adjusts the count to the investigation scope.

Can it investigate changing working trees?

Yes. It asks for re-verification when the working tree changes during the investigation.

What should a handoff include?

A useful handoff includes evidence, references, assumptions, unresolved questions, and deferred work.

Does it replace code review?

No. It improves discovery and planning, but tests, implementation review, and security validation remain necessary.

开发者详情

作者

blockmatic

许可证

MIT

Skillstore 修订

版本提示

作者未声明版本。

仓库

https://github.com/blockmatic/basilic-skills/tree/5fa16493413923e31f1df31f7260224f0f291d9e/skills/w-council

引用

80d63d9c11ea03b64ed0d4e578bac3a9acbe4c91

维护新鲜度

2026/9/20

使用量

0 次下载 · 0 次浏览

文件结构

📄 SKILL.md