技能 deep-research-framework
📦

deep-research-framework

内容修订 r1 安全 ⚙️ 外部命令

Build Research Reports with Traceable Evidence

Research reports can hide weak sources, stale facts, and unsupported conclusions. This framework guides clear questions, independent verification, and conclusion-first writing with explicit uncertainty.

支持: Claude Codex Code(CC)
🥉 78 青铜

使用我的智能体安装

将此请求复制给你的智能体，其中包含权威 Skill 页面和清单。

智能体请求
Review the Skillstore skill "deep-research-framework" from https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.

你的智能体仍应展示其计划，并按安全策略请求必要确认。

Agent 可读资源

当 AI Agent、爬虫或脚本需要干净上下文，而不是读取完整页面时，请使用这些链接。

Markdown 详情 GET /skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework.md 已签名 manifest GET /api/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/manifest 已签名 lockfile GET /api/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/lockfile

测试它

正在使用“deep-research-framework”。 Outline research on whether our team should adopt a new documentation platform.

预期结果:

  • Main question: Does the platform meet our documentation requirements?
  • Sub-questions: What features are documented? What migration work is required? What costs are supported by current evidence?
  • Primary sources: Official documentation, pricing pages, and measured trial results.
  • Uncertainty: Actual migration effort and independent corroboration remain unresolved.

正在使用“deep-research-framework”。 Assess a vendor availability claim supported by one undated brochure.

预期结果:

  • Conclusion: The vendor availability claim remains a single-source claim.
  • Evidence: Only one undated vendor brochure was supplied.
  • Verification gap: No independent measurements or dated supporting documents were provided.
  • Reassessment condition: Dated operational evidence and independent corroboration could change this conclusion.

安全审计

安全
v1 • 2026/10/6 打开版本化报告

The static command-execution finding is a false positive: SKILL.md lines 34-51 contain a fenced Markdown report outline. No evidence found of executable commands, data exfiltration intent, or prompt injection in the reviewed skill.

1
已扫描文件
60
分析行数
0
复核项
0
已忽略误报

风险因素

⚙️ 外部命令 (1)
SKILL.md:34-51
最新一次完成的静态与语义审计未检测到已确认的安全发现。这并不能证明该 Skill 没有副作用。
审计者: codex
分享与引用此报告

分享版本化评估报告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片和引用。Skillstore 只报告证据，不判断该 Skill 是否安全。

打开版本化报告
安全评估

复制报告链接

https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report

Markdown 徽章

[![Skillstore security assessment](https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/security.svg)](https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework?utm_source=security_passport_badge)

HTML 徽章

<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>

嵌入卡片

<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>
学术引用 (APA · BibTeX · CFF)

APA 引用

alapha888. (2026). deep-research-framework security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version unspecified]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/audits/1

BibTeX 引用

@techreport{alapha888-alapha888-deep-research-framework-2026, author = {alapha888}, title = {deep-research-framework security audit report (audit version 1)}, institution = {Skillstore}, year = {2026}, number = {1}, url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/audits/1}, note = {Author version unspecified} }

CITATION.cff

cff-version: 1.2.0 message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report." title: "deep-research-framework security audit report (audit version 1)" version: "unspecified" type: report authors: - name: "alapha888" date-released: "2026-10-06" url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/alapha888-deep-research-framework/audits/1" identifiers: - type: other value: "skillstore:alapha888-deep-research-framework:audit:1" description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"

Skillstore 评分

评分依据 证据置信度: 中
55
架构
85
可维护性
87
内容
65
社区
91
规范符合性

你能构建什么

Compare Competitors

Structure a competitor comparison around dated product evidence, independent corroboration, and gaps in available information.

Investigate a Technical Topic

Prioritize original papers and official documentation, then distinguish supported conclusions from speculation.

Prepare an Evidence-Based Brief

Organize a policy question into focused sections with traceable sources and explicit uncertainty.

试试这些提示

Start a Research Outline 
Create a research outline for [topic]. Define one main question, up to three sub-questions, source tiers, and an uncertainty section.
Review Source Quality 
Assess these sources for [question]: [sources]. Classify their tiers, check independence, flag undated facts, and identify claims that need corroboration.
Write a Comparative Report 
Compare [option A] and [option B] using [provided evidence]. Lead with conclusions, cite numerical claims, date facts, and mark single-source claims.
Audit Conclusions and Uncertainty 
Audit this report: [report and sources]. Check source independence, unsupported numbers, speculation, and stale facts. Revise conclusions and state what would invalidate them.

最佳实践

  • Set the main question and source tiers before gathering information.
  • Check that corroborating sources do not repeat the same original source.
  • Date key facts and state missing evidence, speculation, and reassessment conditions.

避免

  • Treating social posts or forum discussions as evidence for core conclusions.
  • Presenting single-source claims, speculation, or undated facts as established current knowledge.
  • Listing sources without clear conclusions or hiding unresolved questions.

常见问题

Does this skill search the web automatically?
It defines a research workflow but includes no search implementation. Browsing depends on the host assistant and available tools.
Which sources should support conclusions?
Use primary sources and reputable secondary sources. Treat social posts, forums, and aggregators as leads rather than evidence.
How many sources does a key conclusion need?
Use at least two independent sources. Multiple sources repeating one origin do not count as independent corroboration.
What happens when only one source exists?
Label the conclusion as a single-source claim and note that independent verification is missing.
How should outdated information be handled?
Date every key fact. Treat undated information as possibly stale and explain how newer evidence could change the conclusion.
What should the final report contain?
Include core conclusions, sections ordered by conclusion, evidence, and sources, plus an uncertainty statement covering missing evidence and reassessment conditions.

开发者详情

作者

alapha888

许可证

MIT

Skillstore 修订

r1

版本提示

作者未声明版本。

仓库

https://github.com/alapha888/agent-skills-en/tree/f248342d20ae1e47ecfb146ea112a3e76234ff27/skills/deep-research-framework

引用

9bbb9af75d2f5ea5acb8fac5aec75713670a067f

维护新鲜度

2026/10/6

使用量

0 次下载 · 0 次浏览

文件结构

📄 SKILL.md

alapha888 的更多技能

查看全部

相关技能

查看全部