repro-first-debugging
78Debug Failures With Reproducible Evidence
Bug fixes based on guesses can miss the cause and introduce regressions. This skill guides reproduction, hypothesis testing, focused fixes, and verification with recorded evidence.
Review Code Changes for Security Risks
Security defects can hide in small changes to input handling, authentication, and configuration. This skill guides scoped code triage with evidence, realistic severity, and actionable fixes.
将此请求复制给你的智能体,其中包含权威 Skill 页面和清单。
Review the Skillstore skill "security-quick-review" from https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-security-quick-review.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/agentkitco-security-quick-review/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.你的智能体仍应展示其计划,并按安全策略请求必要确认。
当 AI Agent、爬虫或脚本需要干净上下文,而不是读取完整页面时,请使用这些链接。
正在使用“security-quick-review”。 Illustrative request: review a change that retrieves customer records by a supplied identifier.
预期结果:
正在使用“security-quick-review”。 Illustrative request: summarize a scoped review where no concrete issue was identified.
预期结果:
All five static findings are false positives from defensive review instructions, inline Markdown, and a fenced report template. The skill prohibits live exploitation and secret disclosure, while limiting review to scoped code and local tests. No evidence found of prompt injection, credential collection, or data exfiltration.
分享版本化评估报告、中性徽章、嵌入卡片和引用。Skillstore 只报告证据,不判断该 Skill 是否安全。
https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-security-quick-review/audits/1?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_report[](https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-security-quick-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge)<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-security-quick-review?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/agentkitco-security-quick-review/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a><iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/agentkitco-security-quick-review.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>agentkitco. (2026). security-quick-review security audit report (audit version 1) [Author version 1.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-security-quick-review/audits/1@techreport{agentkitco-agentkitco-security-quick-review-2026,
author = {agentkitco},
title = {security-quick-review security audit report (audit version 1)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {1},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-security-quick-review/audits/1},
note = {Author version 1.0}
}cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "security-quick-review security audit report (audit version 1)"
version: "1.0"
type: report
authors:
- name: "agentkitco"
date-released: "2026-10-17"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/agentkitco-security-quick-review/audits/1"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:agentkitco-security-quick-review:audit:1"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Check authentication, input handling, and related call paths before merging a change.
Inspect package changes, lockfiles, CI permissions, and failure behavior within a defined release scope.
Collect evidence, realistic impact, and verification gaps for a focused follow-up security assessment.
Review this diff for likely security issues. State the scope, cite file and line evidence, and suggest specific fixes without revealing secrets.
Review [endpoint] and its called code for untrusted input, injection, authorization gaps, and data exposure. Separate verified findings from unresolved questions.
Review [release diff] for secret exposure, dependency changes, configuration permissions, and failure behavior. Inspect scoped Git history without printing secret values.
Trace authorization and data flow through [module] and its callers. Rank evidence-backed risks, propose local regression tests, and identify checks requiring human verification.
作者
agentkitco许可证
MIT
作者版本
v1.0
Skillstore 修订
r1
版本提示
作者声明的版本不符合 SemVer 规范。
引用
743429f75b17204d47661a86b577a575ad67517f
维护新鲜度
2026/10/17
使用量
0 次下载 · 0 次浏览
文件结构
📄 SKILL.md
Debug Failures With Reproducible Evidence
Bug fixes based on guesses can miss the cause and introduce regressions. This skill guides reproduction, hypothesis testing, focused fixes, and verification with recorded evidence.
Verify Tests Ran Before Reporting Completion
Completion claims can hide skipped tests, stale results, or checks that never exercised a change. This skill guides fresh verification and reports evidence for each claim.
Write Pull Request Descriptions From Real Changes
Reviewers need clear explanations of changes, testing, and risk. This skill turns Git diffs and commits into structured pull request descriptions grounded in available evidence.
Upgrade Dependencies With Release Note Verification
Dependency upgrades can introduce breaking changes and obscure existing failures. This skill guides focused upgrades through release notes, baseline checks, targeted edits, and verification reports.
Preserve Progress Across Agent Sessions
Long sessions and agent changes can lose important project context. This skill creates a concise handoff with verified state, decisions, and ordered next steps.
Review Your Git Changes Before a Pull Request
Unreviewed changes can hide correctness, security, and compatibility problems. This skill guides an evidence-based review with prioritized findings and clearly reported validation results.
Review Defects and Verify Root-Cause Repairs
由 aakashh242
Reviews can miss failure conditions or accept fixes without reliable evidence. Gauntlet guides scoped adversarial reviews, authorized repairs, and revision-bound verification within a finite budget.
Audit NestJS Code with Evidence-Backed Findings
由 amirtaherkhani
NestJS repositories can hide boundary flaws and runtime risks that lint results alone cannot reveal. This skill combines local evidence collection and semantic review into one prioritized report.
使用结构化质量检查审查代码
由 alirezarezvani
代码审查可能会漏掉质量、安全性和可维护性问题。此技能通过脚本、检查清单和报告生成来指导结构化审查。
审查代码中的缺陷和安全问题
由 21pounder
代码审查可能会漏掉缺陷、安全漏洞和可维护性问题。此技能会引导 Claude、Codex 和 Claude Code 完成结构化的审查步骤。
使用结构化 AI 反馈进行代码审查
由 EnactProtocol
当上下文有限时,手动代码审查可能会漏掉 bug、风格问题和高风险模式。此技能会审查提供的代码,并返回按优先级排列的问题、建议、摘要和质量评分。
提交前审查代码
由 2389-research
当团队过快信任最终变更时,就会发布缺陷。此技能会添加一次聚焦的提交前审查,覆盖安全、逻辑、业务规则和性能。