Audit History
arch-doc-generation - 4 audits
Version comparison
Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.
| Version | Date | Result | Review items | Change vs previous |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| v4 Latest | Jul 24, 2026, 02:08 AM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v3 | Jul 15, 2026, 02:48 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v2 | Jul 15, 2026, 02:48 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | No capability change |
| v1 | Jul 15, 2026, 02:48 PM | No confirmed findings | 0 | Baseline |
Jul 24, 2026, 02:08 AM
All nine static findings are false positives. Eight findings identify Markdown fences or inline code, while the entropy heuristic reflects readable Chinese documentation and structured templates. No executable commands, obfuscated content, prompt injection, or other semantic security issues were found.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (8)
Jul 15, 2026, 02:48 PM
All nine static findings are false positives. Eight detections are Markdown backticks or fenced examples, while the entropy alert reflects multilingual documentation and text diagrams. No executable commands, obfuscated payloads, or prompt injection attempts were found.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (8)
Jul 15, 2026, 02:48 PM
All nine static findings are false positives. Eight detections are Markdown backticks or fenced examples, while the entropy alert reflects multilingual documentation and text diagrams. No executable commands, obfuscated payloads, or prompt injection attempts were found.
Risk Factors
⚙️ External commands (8)
Jul 15, 2026, 02:48 PM
All nine static findings are false positives. Eight detections are Markdown backticks or fenced examples, while the entropy alert reflects multilingual documentation and text diagrams. No executable commands, obfuscated payloads, or prompt injection attempts were found.