Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-4BE93A4C

2/24/2026, 9:18:50 AM

test-driven-development security assessment v1

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: claude Historical report
Skill name
test-driven-development
Version
v1
Maintainer
ZhanlinCui
Coverage
2 Files scanned · 672 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Highest confirmed finding severity

Medium

1 confirmed security finding requires attention.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

This is a legitimate Test-Driven Development educational skill. The static analyzer detected 73 potential issues, but after semantic evaluation, all findings are FALSE POSITIVES. The 'external_commands' detections are markdown code block delimiters (backticks) in documentation, not actual shell execution. The 'weak cryptographic algorithm' and 'network reconnaissance' detections are similarly false positives triggered by keywords in educational context. No executable malicious code exists in this skill.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

2 Files scanned · 672 Lines analyzed

1 item shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Not recorded by this audit

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Not recorded by this audit

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Not recorded by this audit

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

Confirmed security concerns (1)

RISK-001 Medium
Markdown Code Block Delimiters Flagged as Shell Execution
The static scanner detected 'Ruby/shell backtick execution' patterns in markdown files. These are FALSE POSITIVES - the backticks are markdown code fence delimiters (```typescript, ```bash) used for syntax highlighting in documentation, not runtime command execution. The skill is educational content about TDD methodology with no actual shell commands being executed.
Examined the actual file contents - backticks appear exclusively in markdown code fences for TypeScript and Bash examples demonstrating test code, not as shell execution operators

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: claude

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Verify and export

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable