Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-3FA55C0C

7/1/2026, 3:28:38 AM

doc-coauthoring security assessment v2

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
doc-coauthoring
Version
v2
Maintainer
ZhanlinCui
Coverage
1 Files scanned · 376 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Highest confirmed finding severity

Medium

2 confirmed security findings require attention.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

Static analysis reported shell execution, weak cryptography, and network patterns, but the shell and crypto alerts are false positives from Markdown workflow text and tool names. The remaining real concerns are legitimate workflow behaviors: optional connector access to shared documents or channels, and creating or editing documentation files.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

1 Files scanned · 376 Lines analyzed

2 items shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Observed in 3 evidence locations

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Observed in 5 evidence locations

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Not recorded by this audit

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

Confirmed security concerns (2)

RISK-001 Medium
Optional Connector Access to Shared Documents and Channels
The skill instructs the assistant to use available integrations to fetch shared documents or read messaging context. This is a legitimate documentation workflow, but it can expose sensitive organizational content if users grant broad connector access without reviewing scope.
The file explicitly tells the assistant to read shared documents or use integrations when available. The behavior is user-directed and not malicious, but it creates a real privacy and access-control concern.
RISK-002 Medium
User Workspace File Creation and Editing
The skill directs the assistant to create Markdown files and use artifact editing tools while drafting documents. This is expected for co-authoring, but it requires normal workspace write permissions and user review before important files are overwritten or changed.
The instructions explicitly call for creating files and replacing document text. The purpose is legitimate, but the file-write behavior is concrete and should be disclosed.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (4)
Low
Static Shell Execution Alerts Are False Positives
The reported Ruby or shell backtick detections occur inside Markdown inline code references such as create_file and str_replace, plus prose about creating Markdown files. No shell command, Ruby execution, or command interpolation is present.
The flagged text is Markdown documentation naming editor tools or files, not executable Ruby or shell code. There is no evidence of command execution syntax beyond inline-code formatting.
Low
Static Weak Cryptography Alerts Are False Positives
The flagged lines contain ordinary documentation words such as doc, docs, Claude, and workflow text. No hashing, encryption, cipher selection, or cryptographic API usage is present.
Manual review found no cryptographic operation at the listed locations. The alerts appear to be keyword matches inside natural-language documentation.
Low
Static Network Reconnaissance Alert Is a False Positive
The flagged line is an instruction for the user to provide an information dump or link shared documents. It does not describe scanning hosts, discovering services, or probing networks.
The line is plain workflow guidance for collecting user-provided context. No network reconnaissance command or probing behavior appears in the surrounding text.
Low
Hardcoded Claude URL Is Benign
The hardcoded URL points users to Claude.ai for manual reader testing. It is not used for automatic data transfer, credential collection, or hidden outbound requests.
The URL is shown as a user-facing instruction to open a fresh Claude conversation. There is no code path that sends data to the URL automatically.

Verify and export

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable