nature-response
Draft Reviewer Response Letters
Reviewer comments can be difficult to answer without unsupported claims. This skill creates traceable response packages with risks, placeholders, and author questions.
Install with my Agent
Copy this request to your Agent. It includes the canonical Skill page and manifest.
Review the Skillstore skill "nature-response" from https://skillstore.io/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-response.md and its manifest at https://skillstore.io/api/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-response/manifest. Verify the artifact. You may proceed after verification, subject to the environment's own policy.Your Agent should still show its plan and request any confirmation required by the security policy.
Agent-readable resources
Use these links when an AI agent, crawler, or script needs clean context instead of reading the full page.
Test it
Using "nature-response". Reviewer asks for an independent validation cohort, but the author only says validation was added.
Expected outcome:
The skill marks the item as needs author input and asks for result summary, cohort size, figure location, and manuscript section.
Using "nature-response". Two reviewers disagree about whether the abstract should strengthen or soften a causal claim.
Expected outcome:
The skill surfaces the conflict, prioritizes editor constraints and study design, then drafts a cautious response with claim softening.
Using "nature-response". A Chinese author note says the reviewer misunderstood the method.
Expected outcome:
The skill rewrites the stance as a manuscript clarity issue and adds a Chinese note asking for the exact Methods change.
Security Audit
SafeAll static findings were adjudicated as false positives after reviewing the cited Markdown context. The skill contains reviewer-response instructions, examples, source links, and inline code labels, with no prompt injection, command execution, obfuscation, or reconnaissance intent found.
Risk Factors
Share & cite this report
Share the versioned assessment report, neutral badge, embed card, and citations. Skillstore reports evidence without deciding whether this Skill is safe.
Copy report link
https://skillstore.io/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-response/audits/4?utm_source=security_passport&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=versioned_reportMarkdown badge
[](https://skillstore.io/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-response?utm_source=security_passport_badge)HTML badge
<a href="https://skillstore.io/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-response?utm_source=security_passport_badge"><img src="https://skillstore.io/badges/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-response/security.svg" alt="Skillstore security assessment" loading="lazy"></a>Embed card
<iframe src="https://skillstore.io/embed/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-response.html" title="Skillstore Security Assessment" sandbox="allow-popups allow-popups-to-escape-sandbox" loading="lazy" referrerpolicy="no-referrer" width="420" height="180"></iframe>Academic citations (APA · BibTeX · CFF)
APA citation
Community contribution, refactored into static/dynamic layers. (2026). nature-response security audit report (audit version 4) [Author version 1.0.0]. Skillstore. https://skillstore.io/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-response/audits/4BibTeX citation
@techreport{community-contribution-refactored-into-static-dynamic-layers-yuan1z0825-nature-response-2026,
author = {Community contribution, refactored into static/dynamic layers},
title = {nature-response security audit report (audit version 4)},
institution = {Skillstore},
year = {2026},
number = {4},
url = {https://skillstore.io/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-response/audits/4},
note = {Author version 1.0.0}
}CITATION.cff
cff-version: 1.2.0
message: "If you use this Skill, cite its author and this versioned security audit report."
title: "nature-response security audit report (audit version 4)"
version: "1.0.0"
type: report
authors:
- name: "Community contribution, refactored into static/dynamic layers"
date-released: "2026-07-08"
url: "https://skillstore.io/skills/yuan1z0825-nature-response/audits/4"
identifiers:
- type: other
value: "skillstore:yuan1z0825-nature-response:audit:4"
description: "Skillstore immutable audit report identifier"
Skillstore Score
Why this score Evidence Confidence: HighWhat You Can Build
Prepare a Major Revision
Turn editor and reviewer comments into a response strategy, tracker, draft letter, and missing-input list.
Audit a Response Draft
Check an existing rebuttal for missing replies, unsupported claims, weak tone, and traceability gaps.
Convert Chinese Author Notes
Transform Chinese revision notes into professional English responses with clear Chinese follow-up questions.
Try These Prompts
Draft a point-by-point response letter from these reviewer comments and author notes. Keep placeholders for missing facts.
Audit this response draft against the reviewer comments. List missing replies, unsupported claims, tone risks, and required author inputs.
Build a response strategy for these conflicting reviewer requests. Prioritize editor instructions and map each response to manuscript changes.
Triage this revision package before drafting. Identify blocked items, author questions, readiness state, and any appeal-like issues.
Best Practices
- Provide reviewer comments, editor instructions, author actions, and manuscript locations together.
- Keep missing facts visible until the author supplies exact evidence.
- Review the readiness state before using any text in a submission.
Avoid
- Do not ask for final wording when evidence, locations, or approvals are missing.
- Do not remove placeholders before author facts are confirmed.
- Do not use the skill to draft an appeal as a normal revision response.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can this skill write a full response letter?
Can it work with Chinese notes?
Will it invent missing experiments or line numbers?
Can it handle reviewer disagreement?
Does it draft cover letters?
Is it limited to Nature journals?
Developer Details
License
MIT
Author version
v1.0.0
Skillstore revision
r1
Ref
64ca8af0f54a325752f08bd54e52151061ea659a
Maintenance freshness
7/20/2026
Usage
5 downloads · 0 views
File structure