技能 test-kitchen
👨‍🍳

test-kitchen

安全

Explore implementations in parallel

也可從以下取得: 2389-research

Development teams often get stuck on architectural decisions or default to one approach without comparison. This skill provides gate skills that offer parallel exploration before implementation and competition during implementation. Multiple variants are built and tested, letting real results determine the best approach.

支援: Claude Codex Code(CC)
📊 69 充足
1

下載技能 ZIP

2

在 Claude 中上傳

前往 設定 → 功能 → 技能 → 上傳技能

3

開啟並開始使用

測試它

正在使用「test-kitchen」。 Build a CLI todo app with test-kitchen

預期結果:

  • Before diving in, how would you like to approach this?
  • Option 1: Brainstorm together - explore requirements step by step
  • Option 2: Omakase - generate multiple approaches and implement them in parallel
  • Tests will pick the winner

安全審計

安全
v3 • 1/10/2026

Pure prompt-based skill containing only markdown documentation. No executable code, no file access, no network calls, and no environment variable access. All content is workflow guidance for AI-assisted development.

5
已掃描檔案
1,069
分析行數
0
發現項
3
審計總數
未發現安全問題
審計者: claude 查看審計歷史 →

品質評分

38
架構
100
可維護性
83
內容
32
社群
100
安全
78
規範符合性

你能建構什麼

Escape linear thinking

When uncertain about an approach, explore multiple implementations simultaneously instead of committing to one path.

Evaluate trade-offs objectively

Let competing implementations reveal strengths and weaknesses rather than debating theory.

Compare implementation styles

See how different teams approach the same design to learn patterns and anti-patterns.

試試這些提示

Quick parallel build
Build X using omakase-off. I want to see multiple approaches implemented in parallel.
During brainstorming
We are brainstorming the architecture. If the user shows uncertainty about key decisions, offer omakase-off parallel exploration.
At implementation time
We have a design document ready. How should we implement this? Present cookoff options for parallel implementation.
Explicit competition
Run a cookoff between 3 agents implementing this design. Each agent creates their own plan and implementation.

最佳實務

  • Use omakase-off when uncertain about architectural choices to explore multiple designs
  • Use cookoff when you have a clear design but want to compare implementation approaches
  • Always invoke the judge skill to get objective scoring before selecting a winner

避免

  • Using omakase-off for trivial decisions like file naming or config format
  • Sharing a pre-made implementation plan across agents in cookoff
  • Skipping fresh-eyes review or scenario testing before judge evaluation

常見問題

What is the difference between omakase-off and cookoff?
Omakase-off explores different DESIGNS before implementation. Cookoff implements the same DESIGN with different approaches.
How many parallel implementations can I run?
Omakase-off caps at 5-6 variants. Cookoff recommends 2-5 based on feature complexity assessment.
Does this skill execute code directly?
No. This is a prompt-based workflow skill. It orchestrates other skills for actual implementation.
What happens to the losing implementations?
Worktrees and branches are automatically cleaned up. The winner branch is kept for merge or PR.
Which skills does test-kitchen depend on?
It uses writing-plans, executing-plans, scenario-testing, fresh-eyes, and finish-branch skills if installed.
Can I use this with existing brainstorming workflows?
Yes. Omakase-off detects indecision during existing brainstorming and offers parallel exploration as an option.

開發者詳情

檔案結構