Audit History

Most static findings are false positives from Markdown examples, localhost URLs, and resource path formatting. Two filesystem findings are confirmed because the replay guide writes production workflow histories to local files. No prompt injection or malicious intent was found.

Most static findings are false positives from Markdown examples, localhost URLs, and resource path formatting. Two filesystem findings are confirmed because the replay guide writes production workflow histories to local files. No prompt injection or malicious intent was found.

Static analysis reported many high-risk patterns, but most are false positives from Markdown code fences, documentation examples, and the word skill being misread as weak crypto. The main confirmed concern is legitimate replay-testing guidance that exports production workflow histories to local files, which can expose sensitive workflow data if users do not protect or sanitize it.

Educational documentation for Temporal workflow testing. Static scanner false positives: markdown code block backticks flagged as shell execution, legitimate docs URLs as hardcoded URLs, and test code patterns as cryptographic/C2 indicators. All 149 findings are false positives from documentation patterns.

Educational documentation for Temporal workflow testing. Static scanner false positives: markdown code block backticks flagged as shell execution, legitimate docs URLs as hardcoded URLs, and test code patterns as cryptographic/C2 indicators. All 149 findings are false positives from documentation patterns.

The skill contains only educational documentation about testing Temporal workflows. No executable code, credential access, or malicious patterns were found. Content is instructional and matches the stated testing purpose.

The skill contains only educational documentation about testing Temporal workflows. No executable code, credential access, or malicious patterns were found. Content is instructional and matches the stated testing purpose.