The skill is documentation-only and contains no prompt injection attempt or runtime code. Most command, URL, and environment detections are false positives from fenced examples, but several examples teach unsafe secret handling through CI log output, Terraform state persistence, and weak demo credentials.
Several CI examples use echo with API keys or database URLs. This teaches users to place secret values in build logs, where they may be retained or shared.
The examples explicitly print secret variables using echo. This is direct evidence of a log disclosure pattern.
The Terraform example reads a database password from AWS Secrets Manager and assigns it to an RDS password field. Terraform state can retain that value.
The snippet shows the secret value assigned into Terraform-managed infrastructure. Terraform state commonly records resource arguments unless a provider handles them as write-only.
The Vault setup example uses a root token and a literal password value. It is labeled as a dev server, but the snippet needs a clearer non-production warning.
The context says dev server, which reduces severity. The root token and simple password are still risky if copied into reusable automation.
Capability review items (6)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
The Terraform example passes a retrieved database password into a resource argument, which can persist secret material in Terraform state. This is a real exposure risk even though the value comes from Secrets Manager.
The CI example echoes a database URL secret into job logs. Masking can fail for derived or unconfigured values, so this encourages credential disclosure.
The skill is documentation-only and contains no prompt injection attempt or runtime code. Most command, URL, and environment detections are false positives from fenced examples, but several examples teach unsafe secret handling through CI log output, Terraform state persistence, and weak demo credentials.
Several CI examples use echo with API keys or database URLs. This teaches users to place secret values in build logs, where they may be retained or shared.
The examples explicitly print secret variables using echo. This is direct evidence of a log disclosure pattern.
The Terraform example reads a database password from AWS Secrets Manager and assigns it to an RDS password field. Terraform state can retain that value.
The snippet shows the secret value assigned into Terraform-managed infrastructure. Terraform state commonly records resource arguments unless a provider handles them as write-only.
The Vault setup example uses a root token and a literal password value. It is labeled as a dev server, but the snippet needs a clearer non-production warning.
The context says dev server, which reduces severity. The root token and simple password are still risky if copied into reusable automation.
Capability review items (6)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
The Terraform example passes a retrieved database password into a resource argument, which can persist secret material in Terraform state. This is a real exposure risk even though the value comes from Secrets Manager.
The CI example echoes a database URL secret into job logs. Masking can fail for derived or unconfigured values, so this encourages credential disclosure.
Static analysis correctly found many command, network, and credential patterns, but they appear inside SKILL.md documentation examples rather than executable skill code. No prompt injection or malicious exfiltration intent was found, but several examples encourage printing secrets into CI logs and should carry a marketplace warning or be fixed.
1
Files scanned
347
Lines analyzed
6
Review items
2
False positives ignored
Capability review items (3)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
The documentation includes CI examples that echo API keys, database URLs, and production API keys to job logs. This is dangerous because users may copy the examples and expose secrets through CI output even when platform secret stores are used.
The cited lines explicitly print variables named API key, database URL, and production API key in CI run steps. The context confirms this is documentation, not malicious code, but the unsafe recommendation is clear.
The documentation uses a Vault root token, a literal password value, and a literal AWS secret string in examples. These are presented as setup snippets, but copying them into real environments would create weak or shared credentials.
The examples contain concrete secret-like values and a root token. The Vault block is labeled as a dev server, which lowers maliciousness but does not remove the copy-paste risk.
Network Indicators Use Placeholder or Local Endpoints
The hardcoded URLs and IP address point to localhost or example Vault endpoints in setup documentation. No evidence found of a hidden external collection endpoint or data exfiltration workflow.
The URLs are standard Vault examples and include localhost or example.com hostnames. They do not appear to be attacker-controlled endpoints.
Static false positives ignored (2)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Command Execution Findings Are Documentation Examples
The shell, Vault, AWS CLI, Docker, Terraform, and CI command patterns are inside Markdown code fences. No evidence found that the skill contains executable scripts or automatically runs these commands.
The line context shows fenced documentation blocks rather than runnable repository files. The commands are still relevant risk indicators because users may execute them manually.
The weak cryptographic algorithm alerts correspond to text in the skill description and related skill name, not to cryptographic code. No evidence found of MD5, DES, RC4, or similar algorithms being recommended or executed.
The cited lines are metadata text and a related-skill bullet. They do not contain crypto implementation guidance.
Static analysis correctly found many command, network, and credential patterns, but they appear inside SKILL.md documentation examples rather than executable skill code. No prompt injection or malicious exfiltration intent was found, but several examples encourage printing secrets into CI logs and should carry a marketplace warning or be fixed.
1
Files scanned
347
Lines analyzed
6
Review items
2
False positives ignored
Capability review items (3)
These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.
The documentation includes CI examples that echo API keys, database URLs, and production API keys to job logs. This is dangerous because users may copy the examples and expose secrets through CI output even when platform secret stores are used.
The cited lines explicitly print variables named API key, database URL, and production API key in CI run steps. The context confirms this is documentation, not malicious code, but the unsafe recommendation is clear.
The documentation uses a Vault root token, a literal password value, and a literal AWS secret string in examples. These are presented as setup snippets, but copying them into real environments would create weak or shared credentials.
The examples contain concrete secret-like values and a root token. The Vault block is labeled as a dev server, which lowers maliciousness but does not remove the copy-paste risk.
Network Indicators Use Placeholder or Local Endpoints
The hardcoded URLs and IP address point to localhost or example Vault endpoints in setup documentation. No evidence found of a hidden external collection endpoint or data exfiltration workflow.
The URLs are standard Vault examples and include localhost or example.com hostnames. They do not appear to be attacker-controlled endpoints.
Static false positives ignored (2)
These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.
Command Execution Findings Are Documentation Examples
The shell, Vault, AWS CLI, Docker, Terraform, and CI command patterns are inside Markdown code fences. No evidence found that the skill contains executable scripts or automatically runs these commands.
The line context shows fenced documentation blocks rather than runnable repository files. The commands are still relevant risk indicators because users may execute them manually.
The weak cryptographic algorithm alerts correspond to text in the skill description and related skill name, not to cryptographic code. No evidence found of MD5, DES, RC4, or similar algorithms being recommended or executed.
The cited lines are metadata text and a related-skill bullet. They do not contain crypto implementation guidance.
Only documentation content was found, with examples for secrets tools and CI usage. No code paths show data theft, malicious execution, or hidden network activity.
4
Files scanned
353
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Only documentation content was found, with examples for secrets tools and CI usage. No code paths show data theft, malicious execution, or hidden network activity.
4
Files scanned
353
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.