📦

Audit History

saga-orchestration - 7 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v7 LatestJul 8, 2026, 01:41 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v6 Jul 8, 2026, 01:41 PM No confirmed findings0External commandsNetwork access
v5 Jul 1, 2026, 12:53 AM No confirmed findings0 Network accessExternal commands
v4 Jan 17, 2026, 09:54 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v3 Jan 17, 2026, 09:54 AM No confirmed findings0Network accessExternal commands
v2 Jan 4, 2026, 04:19 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Jan 4, 2026, 04:19 PM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 8, 2026, 01:41 PM

The static findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences, reference links, and a normal Python uuid import. No prompt injection, data exfiltration intent, executable installer script, or malicious behavior was found in SKILL.md.

1
Files scanned
483
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 8, 2026, 01:41 PM

The static findings are false positives caused by Markdown code fences, reference links, and a normal Python uuid import. No prompt injection, data exfiltration intent, executable installer script, or malicious behavior was found in SKILL.md.

1
Files scanned
483
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 1, 2026, 12:53 AM

Static analysis reported shell execution, network, blocker, weak crypto, and reconnaissance patterns. Manual review found these are false positives from markdown code fences, architecture diagram text, an import in sample code, best-practice prose, and two documentation links. No evidence found of malicious intent, prompt injection, data exfiltration, executable setup logic, or runtime network behavior.

1
Files scanned
483
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
3
False positives ignored
Static false positives ignored (3)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
False Positive: Markdown Code Fences Flagged as Shell Execution
The reported backtick execution locations are markdown code block delimiters around diagrams and Python examples. They do not execute commands or instruct the agent to run shell code.
Each location is a markdown fence delimiter, not Ruby backtick execution. The surrounding content is explanatory documentation and Python sample code.
Low
False Positive: Documentation Links Flagged as Network Behavior
The hardcoded URLs are resource links in the markdown Resources section. They are not fetched by code and do not send local data to external services.
Both URLs appear as plain markdown reference links. No executable network client, request body, credential access, or automatic download behavior is present.
Low
False Positive: Blocker Patterns Are Benign Documentation Terms
The high-severity blocker hits map to architecture diagram labels, descriptive prose, and a standard uuid import in a Python example. No evidence found of command-and-control logic, weak cryptographic implementation, or host reconnaissance.
The cited lines contain markdown metadata, table text, diagram labels, a design advice sentence, a book link, and import uuid. None show malware intent or dangerous behavior in context.
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: codex

Jan 17, 2026, 09:54 AM

Pure documentation skill containing code templates for saga pattern implementation. Contains no executable code, filesystem access, network calls, or command execution. All static findings are false positives triggered by documentation text containing technical terminology that scanners incorrectly flag as cryptographic terms, C2 indicators, or shell commands.

2
Files scanned
659
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 17, 2026, 09:54 AM

Pure documentation skill containing code templates for saga pattern implementation. Contains no executable code, filesystem access, network calls, or command execution. All static findings are false positives triggered by documentation text containing technical terminology that scanners incorrectly flag as cryptographic terms, C2 indicators, or shell commands.

2
Files scanned
659
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 4, 2026, 04:19 PM

Pure documentation skill with code templates only. No filesystem access, network calls, command execution, or data collection capabilities detected. All code examples are educational templates for implementing saga patterns.

4
Files scanned
703
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 4, 2026, 04:19 PM

Pure documentation skill with code templates only. No filesystem access, network calls, command execution, or data collection capabilities detected. All code examples are educational templates for implementing saga patterns.

4
Files scanned
703
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude