Versioned security assessment

Report ID: SA-2B9DE188

7/1/2026, 12:59:35 AM

nextjs-app-router-patterns security assessment v5

Skill Security Certification Report

Audit History
Audit model: codex Historical report
Skill name
nextjs-app-router-patterns
Version
v5
Maintainer
wshobson
Coverage
1 Files scanned · 545 Lines analyzed
Policy version
Unavailable

Highest confirmed finding severity

Medium

1 confirmed security finding requires attention.

Installation context

Historical evidence

This report may not describe the currently installable artifact. Open the current Skill page for install guidance.

Open current Skill page

This report does not block or authorize the manifest or ZIP.

Static command execution, weak cryptography, and reconnaissance findings are false positives caused by Markdown fences, TypeScript examples, ordinary metadata fields, and routing identifiers. No prompt injection or malicious runtime behavior was found in SKILL.md, but one instructional API route example writes a parsed request body directly to the database without validation or authorization context.

Report position

Historical report

Open audit history before using this report to install.

Audit attestation

Not attestable

The required immutable binding is incomplete.

Human verification

Not verified

No human verification is recorded for this report.

Coverage

1 Files scanned · 545 Lines analyzed

2 items shown for review

Limitations

This report does not claim runtime or sandbox execution and does not prove the absence of side effects.

Evidence chain

Follow the evidence from source binding to the install contract. Available evidence supports verification; it is not a safety guarantee.

  1. Source

    Binding unavailable

  2. Artifact

    Identity incomplete

  3. Audit

    Complete

  4. Install contract

    Open manifest to verify

    Open manifest

Capabilities observed

Observed means this report recorded supporting evidence. Not recorded does not prove that a capability is absent.

Contains scripts

May execute code included with the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Network access

May connect to external services.

Observed in 4 evidence locations

Filesystem access

May read or write local files.

Not recorded by this audit

Env variables

May read values from the process environment.

Observed in 1 evidence location

External commands

May invoke commands or programs outside the Skill.

Not recorded by this audit

Capability review items (1)
Low
Network and Environment Access Are Example Code
The fetch calls, hardcoded documentation links, and process.env.API_URL reference are part of Next.js teaching examples. They show ordinary application data fetching and configuration, with no evidence of credential exfiltration or hidden outbound behavior by the skill.
The network and environment references appear only inside explanatory TypeScript snippets or resource links. I found no endpoint receiving secrets and no instruction to execute network requests during skill use.

Risk findings

Confirmed security concerns are separated from items that still need review.

Confirmed security concerns (1)

RISK-001 Medium
Instructional API Route Omits Validation
The route handler example parses request JSON and passes the body directly into a database create operation. This is not malicious skill behavior, but users could copy a pattern that lacks schema validation, authorization, and field allowlisting.
The code example clearly shows request.json() followed by db.product.create({ data: body }). It is an instructional security concern rather than evidence of malicious execution by the skill.

Expert evidence

Immutable subject identity, scanner metadata, dismissed matches, and source-level evidence.

Artifact subject

Marketplace commit
Unavailable
Content hash
Unavailable
Tree hash
Unavailable
Skill path
Unavailable
Audit payload hash
Unavailable

Analysis metadata

Audit model: codex

Analysis state: Complete

Scope is limited to the recorded files, lines, methods, and evidence. No runtime or sandbox execution is claimed.

Static false positives ignored (2)
Low
Static Command Execution Findings Are False Positives
The reported Ruby or shell backtick execution locations align with Markdown code fences and TypeScript code blocks. No shell command, Ruby interpolation, child process call, or executable script is present in SKILL.md.
Line-number review shows fenced Markdown and TypeScript examples at every reported command location. There is no executable file or instruction that asks the agent to run these snippets as shell commands.
Low
Weak Cryptography and Reconnaissance Findings Are False Positives
The weak cryptography flags correspond to ordinary descriptive text and metadata fields. The reconnaissance flags correspond to route parameters, identifiers, or rendering examples, not host inspection or system discovery commands.
Reviewed locations contain Next.js prose, metadata description properties, route params, or database update examples. No cryptographic primitive, hash operation, uname, whoami, environment dump, or filesystem reconnaissance appears.

Verify and export

The manifest and lockfile bind install artifacts to cryptographic hashes. This integrity claim is separate from the security assessment.

Audit attestation: not_attestable