📦

Audit History

microservices-patterns - 8 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v8 LatestJul 7, 2026, 08:18 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v7 Jul 7, 2026, 08:18 AM No confirmed findings0External commands
v6 Jul 1, 2026, 12:35 AM 1 confirmed1 External commands
v5 Jan 21, 2026, 07:28 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v4 Jan 17, 2026, 08:15 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v3 Jan 17, 2026, 08:15 AM No confirmed findings0External commands
v2 Jan 4, 2026, 04:40 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Jan 4, 2026, 04:40 PM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 7, 2026, 08:18 AM

All static findings were reviewed in SKILL.md. The backtick alerts are Markdown code fences, the network alerts are illustrative microservice examples, and the reconnaissance alerts are business identifiers in sample code. No prompt injection or malicious intent was found.

1
Files scanned
586
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 7, 2026, 08:18 AM

All static findings were reviewed in SKILL.md. The backtick alerts are Markdown code fences, the network alerts are illustrative microservice examples, and the reconnaissance alerts are business identifiers in sample code. No prompt injection or malicious intent was found.

1
Files scanned
586
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 1, 2026, 12:35 AM

Static findings were reviewed against SKILL.md. The external command, weak cryptography, and system reconnaissance detections are false positives from markdown fences or ordinary documentation text. The skill contains HTTP client examples for internal services, which is a low-risk documentation pattern with no automatic execution or exfiltration evidence.

1
Files scanned
586
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
2
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (1)

Low
System Reconnaissance Detections Are Domain Data Access
The system reconnaissance findings point to customer, transaction, reservation, and order identifiers in microservice examples. They are not host or environment enumeration commands.
The flagged lines are business identifiers inside illustrative service code. No evidence found of filesystem, process, network interface, or host reconnaissance behavior.
Capability review items (1)

These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.

Low
HTTP Client Examples Require Normal User Review
The skill includes HTTP client examples and internal service URLs for API gateway and service client patterns. They are documentation snippets with no automatic execution or secret transfer.
The network use is explicit and appears legitimate for a microservices skill. Risk remains low because users could adapt the snippets to real services and should review endpoints and data sent.
Static false positives ignored (2)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
Markdown Code Fences Misclassified as Shell Execution
The static analyzer reported Ruby or shell backtick execution at markdown code fence lines. These locations delimit Python documentation examples and do not execute commands.
The flagged lines are visible markdown code fence delimiters around Python examples. No runtime script, shell command, or command interpolation path exists in SKILL.md.
Low
Weak Cryptography Detections Are Text Matches
The static analyzer flagged weak cryptography at description and deserializer text. These lines do not contain cryptographic algorithms or security-sensitive crypto decisions.
The reviewed lines contain words such as description, Designing, and value_deserializer. No evidence found of DES, MD5, RC4, or other weak cryptographic API usage.
Audited by: codex

Jan 21, 2026, 07:28 PM

Static analysis detected 36 patterns across 2 files. All findings evaluated as false positives or safe educational content. The 18 weak crypto alerts match on words like design and description in documentation. The 11 external command alerts are markdown code fences for syntax highlighting. Network patterns are legitimate example URLs for teaching microservices communication. No actual security risks identified.

2
Files scanned
1,025
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 17, 2026, 08:15 AM

AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.

2
Files scanned
786
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Detected Patterns

Python HTTP librariesHardcoded URLWeak cryptographic algorithmRuby/shell backtick executionHTTP client librarySystem reconnaissance
Audited by: claude

Jan 17, 2026, 08:15 AM

AI analysis failed after multiple attempts - MANUAL REVIEW REQUIRED before publishing. This skill cannot be auto-published until reviewed by a human.

2
Files scanned
786
Lines analyzed
2
Review items
0
False positives ignored

Detected Patterns

Python HTTP librariesHardcoded URLWeak cryptographic algorithmRuby/shell backtick executionHTTP client librarySystem reconnaissance
Audited by: claude

Jan 4, 2026, 04:40 PM

Pure documentation skill containing only markdown files with architectural guidance. No executable code, no file access, no network calls. Code examples in SKILL.md are illustrative templates only.

4
Files scanned
786
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 4, 2026, 04:40 PM

Pure documentation skill containing only markdown files with architectural guidance. No executable code, no file access, no network calls. Code examples in SKILL.md are illustrative templates only.

4
Files scanned
786
Lines analyzed
1
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude