📦

Audit History

javascript-testing-patterns - 7 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v7 LatestJul 7, 2026, 07:43 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v6 Jul 7, 2026, 07:43 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v5 Jul 1, 2026, 01:22 AM 2 confirmed0No capability change
v4 Jan 17, 2026, 09:32 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v3 Jan 17, 2026, 09:32 AM No confirmed findings0Network accessExternal commandsFilesystem accessEnv variables
v2 Jan 5, 2026, 05:01 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Jan 5, 2026, 05:01 PM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 7, 2026, 07:43 AM

The static hits are false positives from Markdown fences, TypeScript template literals, placeholder URLs, Supertest examples, normal relative imports, and environment-variable placeholders in documentation. I found no evidence that the skill executes commands, performs filesystem traversal, sends email, exfiltrates secrets, or attempts prompt injection.

1
Files scanned
1,026
Lines analyzed
4
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 7, 2026, 07:43 AM

The static hits are false positives from Markdown fences, TypeScript template literals, placeholder URLs, Supertest examples, normal relative imports, and environment-variable placeholders in documentation. I found no evidence that the skill executes commands, performs filesystem traversal, sends email, exfiltrates secrets, or attempts prompt injection.

1
Files scanned
1,026
Lines analyzed
4
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 1, 2026, 01:22 AM

Static analysis reported many critical and high indicators, but review found a single Markdown guide with TypeScript documentation examples, not an executable skill payload. Network, email, environment variable, and database cleanup examples are legitimate testing topics, but they create medium risk if copied into a real project without test isolation and secret hygiene.

1
Files scanned
1,026
Lines analyzed
6
Review items
3
False positives ignored

Confirmed security concerns (2)

Medium
Network and Email Examples Require Isolation
The guide includes sample fetch calls to an external API and a nodemailer transport that reads SMTP values from environment variables. This is appropriate test documentation, but copied examples could contact external services or expose email credentials if used outside mocked test environments.
The network and environment access patterns are directly present in documentation examples. Confidence is below very high because the file is Markdown guidance and does not execute these calls itself.
Medium
Database Cleanup Examples Can Be Destructive
The integration test section shows test database setup and cleanup, including dropping and truncating a users table. The intent is legitimate, but these statements are dangerous if pointed at a shared or production database.
The SQL cleanup operations are visible and potentially destructive in a copied test setup. The surrounding context names a test database, so the risk depends on user configuration.
Static false positives ignored (3)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
Static Command Execution Hits Are Markdown Code Fence False Positives
The repeated Ruby or shell backtick detections correspond to Markdown fenced TypeScript examples and package script snippets. No evidence found that the skill itself runs shell commands or evaluates user-controlled commands.
The cited lines are code fences and configuration examples in a Markdown guide. There is no executable wrapper, script file, or command invocation path in the scanned file.
Low
Path Traversal Detections Are Relative Import Examples
The path traversal alerts are relative imports used in sample tests, such as importing app, database, logger, or fixtures from neighboring source directories. No evidence found of arbitrary file reads or writes.
The flagged sequences appear inside normal TypeScript import paths. They do not take user input or access filesystem APIs.
Low
Weak Cryptography Alerts Are Keyword False Positives
The scanner flagged words such as hash password, hashed_password, token, and password fields in testing examples. No evidence found of MD5, SHA1, insecure random generation, or cryptographic implementation.
Targeted review found password and token terminology in sample assertions, not weak cryptographic APIs. The finding is likely generated by broad keyword matching.

Detected Patterns

External HTTP Calls in Sample ServiceSMTP Credentials Read From Environment VariablesDestructive SQL Cleanup in Integration Test Example
Audited by: codex

Jan 17, 2026, 09:32 AM

This is a documentation-only skill containing testing pattern examples. The static analyzer flagged 153 patterns, but ALL are FALSE POSITIVEs: weak crypto alerts are triggered by test fixture strings (hashed_password), backtick alerts are TypeScript template literals, path traversal alerts are relative import paths in test code, and the critical heuristic is an invalid combination of benign testing patterns. The previous audit correctly classified this as SAFE.

2
Files scanned
1,204
Lines analyzed
4
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 17, 2026, 09:32 AM

This is a documentation-only skill containing testing pattern examples. The static analyzer flagged 153 patterns, but ALL are FALSE POSITIVEs: weak crypto alerts are triggered by test fixture strings (hashed_password), backtick alerts are TypeScript template literals, path traversal alerts are relative import paths in test code, and the critical heuristic is an invalid combination of benign testing patterns. The previous audit correctly classified this as SAFE.

2
Files scanned
1,204
Lines analyzed
4
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 5, 2026, 05:01 PM

This is a documentation-only skill containing testing patterns and examples. No executable code, network operations, file system access, or external commands are present. The skill provides guidance to AI agents on writing tests.

4
Files scanned
1,266
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 5, 2026, 05:01 PM

This is a documentation-only skill containing testing patterns and examples. No executable code, network operations, file system access, or external commands are present. The skill provides guidance to AI agents on writing tests.

4
Files scanned
1,266
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude