📦

Audit History

deployment-pipeline-design - 8 audits

Version comparison

Capability and finding changes across audited versions, newest first.

VersionDateResultReview itemsChange vs previous
v8 LatestJul 7, 2026, 07:27 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v7 Jul 7, 2026, 07:27 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v6 Jul 1, 2026, 12:09 AM No confirmed findings2No capability change
v5 Jul 1, 2026, 12:09 AM No confirmed findings2No capability change
v4 Jan 17, 2026, 08:23 AM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v3 Jan 17, 2026, 08:23 AM No confirmed findings0Network accessExternal commandsEnv variables
v2 Jan 4, 2026, 05:07 PM No confirmed findings0No capability change
v1 Jan 4, 2026, 05:07 PM No confirmed findings0Baseline

Jul 7, 2026, 07:27 AM

All static findings resolve to documentation false positives in SKILL.md. The file contains Markdown fences, example URLs, placeholder credential text, and CI/CD shell snippets, but no executable skill code, prompt injection, or malicious intent was found.

1
Files scanned
360
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 7, 2026, 07:27 AM

All static findings resolve to documentation false positives in SKILL.md. The file contains Markdown fences, example URLs, placeholder credential text, and CI/CD shell snippets, but no executable skill code, prompt injection, or malicious intent was found.

1
Files scanned
360
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: codex

Jul 1, 2026, 12:09 AM

Static analysis flagged many external command, network, environment, and weak-crypto patterns, but review found they are documentation examples inside SKILL.md. No evidence found of executable code, prompt injection, credential exfiltration, or malicious intent. The remaining risk is low because users may adapt deployment examples that include shell commands, URLs, secrets, and environment variables.

1
Files scanned
360
Lines analyzed
5
Review items
1
False positives ignored
Capability review items (2)

These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.

Low
Documentation Examples Include Deployment Commands
The static external command findings are false positives for marketplace execution because SKILL.md contains Markdown examples, not runnable skill scripts. The examples still include kubectl, docker, make, npm, curl, jq, and shell control flow that users should review before adapting to real systems.
The referenced lines are fenced Markdown examples and are not invoked by any script in the scanned file. They could affect users only if copied into a real CI/CD environment.
Low
Placeholder Network and Secret References
The network and environment findings are example placeholders for health checks, webhook notifications, monitoring endpoints, and feature flag configuration. No evidence found that the skill sends data to external services or reads live credentials during skill execution.
The suspicious strings are in illustrative configuration snippets using example.com, API_KEY, secrets.SLACK_WEBHOOK, and PROMETHEUS_URL. I did not find executable logic that accesses real secrets or performs network exfiltration.
Static false positives ignored (1)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
Weak Cryptography Finding Is a False Positive
The weak cryptographic algorithm alerts appear to match words in metadata and CI/CD terminology rather than actual cryptographic code. No evidence found of MD5, SHA1, DES, RC4, or similar algorithms being implemented or recommended.
The cited lines contain front matter, headings, and general purpose text. I did not find cryptographic algorithm usage in those lines.

Detected Patterns

External Commands in Documentation Examples
Audited by: codex

Jul 1, 2026, 12:09 AM

Static analysis flagged many external command, network, environment, and weak-crypto patterns, but review found they are documentation examples inside SKILL.md. No evidence found of executable code, prompt injection, credential exfiltration, or malicious intent. The remaining risk is low because users may adapt deployment examples that include shell commands, URLs, secrets, and environment variables.

1
Files scanned
360
Lines analyzed
5
Review items
1
False positives ignored
Capability review items (2)

These are real local capabilities that may be expected for this skill, so they require review but are not counted as confirmed malicious behavior.

Low
Documentation Examples Include Deployment Commands
The static external command findings are false positives for marketplace execution because SKILL.md contains Markdown examples, not runnable skill scripts. The examples still include kubectl, docker, make, npm, curl, jq, and shell control flow that users should review before adapting to real systems.
The referenced lines are fenced Markdown examples and are not invoked by any script in the scanned file. They could affect users only if copied into a real CI/CD environment.
Low
Placeholder Network and Secret References
The network and environment findings are example placeholders for health checks, webhook notifications, monitoring endpoints, and feature flag configuration. No evidence found that the skill sends data to external services or reads live credentials during skill execution.
The suspicious strings are in illustrative configuration snippets using example.com, API_KEY, secrets.SLACK_WEBHOOK, and PROMETHEUS_URL. I did not find executable logic that accesses real secrets or performs network exfiltration.
Static false positives ignored (1)

These static matches were dismissed by semantic review or matched schema-only tokens, so they are shown for transparency but do not drive the quality score.

Low
Weak Cryptography Finding Is a False Positive
The weak cryptographic algorithm alerts appear to match words in metadata and CI/CD terminology rather than actual cryptographic code. No evidence found of MD5, SHA1, DES, RC4, or similar algorithms being implemented or recommended.
The cited lines contain front matter, headings, and general purpose text. I did not find cryptographic algorithm usage in those lines.

Detected Patterns

External Commands in Documentation Examples
Audited by: codex

Jan 17, 2026, 08:23 AM

Pure documentation skill containing only markdown explanations and YAML/JSON example snippets. All static findings are false positives triggered by example code patterns in documentation. No executable scripts, network calls, filesystem access, or credential handling code exists. The skill is a reference guide for CI/CD architecture patterns.

2
Files scanned
533
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 17, 2026, 08:23 AM

Pure documentation skill containing only markdown explanations and YAML/JSON example snippets. All static findings are false positives triggered by example code patterns in documentation. No executable scripts, network calls, filesystem access, or credential handling code exists. The skill is a reference guide for CI/CD architecture patterns.

2
Files scanned
533
Lines analyzed
3
Review items
0
False positives ignored
Audited by: claude

Jan 4, 2026, 05:07 PM

Pure documentation skill containing only markdown explanations and YAML/JSON example snippets. No executable scripts, network calls, file system access, or command execution code. Content describes CI/CD concepts and provides reference patterns only.

4
Files scanned
950
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude

Jan 4, 2026, 05:07 PM

Pure documentation skill containing only markdown explanations and YAML/JSON example snippets. No executable scripts, network calls, file system access, or command execution code. Content describes CI/CD concepts and provides reference patterns only.

4
Files scanned
950
Lines analyzed
0
Review items
0
False positives ignored
No confirmed security findings were recorded for this completed audit.
Audited by: claude